Fly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9 Posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1795 times:
I got this one rejected for overexposed and quality. Now the exposure looks good on my screen, I don't see any loss of detail on the airplane or blown out areas.
I am on an LCD and got used to seeing things bright. I got a few dark rejections when I switched to an LCD so now I know that a bit brighter image should be good to go. Is it really way too bright this time?
I think it could use a touch of contrast boost though.
Fly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1735 times:
Yes, lots of snow on the ground. I shot this in Manual mode and got readings from my Sekonic light meter which is quite accurate. No Shadow/Highlight tool was used during editing, no need for that...
Thanks for your replies guys so far.
Mine is a winter shot as well, the approach is over a field that is covered in snow that is never touched. I seem to have more contrast (less light on the underside), mine does seem a bit darker, but not overly so.
For my eyes if you boost the contrast it would be alright.
Carlos From Germany, joined Feb 2006, 225 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1683 times:
it looks on my EIZO also overexposed. You can check the Histogramm in PS and you will the problem.
I agree with LIPH, the photo is a little bit oversharpened (look at the area around the left wheel for example).