Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Airways A330 In N/C Marked As Priority..  
User currently offlinePHLapproach From Philippines, joined Mar 2004, 1243 posts, RR: 20
Posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2668 times:

Screeners, I uploaded a shot last evening after I got home. In fact this one http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...g/ready/USAA333N273AYPHL3-9-07.jpg

I marked it as priority on the upload page as I found out from a friend that you no longer have to send that email like before. I also read on the page that lists out reasons of when to use priority and it says that it can be considered priority after the first photo is up as long as it's in the 24 hour time frame. I just wanted to confirm that you guys are showing it as priority in the queue? Just to make sure that the 24 hours passes and then I get some email or so stating I passed that mark. Is it just me or does the priority screening take a little longer than I thought?

Thanks,
Ed

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4779 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2654 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I just had my first experience with priority screening a couple weeks ago with the first WN 733 with winglets. I uploaded two shots and the following morning before they were accepted, so yes it isn't an immediate process. I then uploaded a third shot within the 24 hour time frame since acceptance of the first two, and it sat in "currently in screening" until the normal queue for that upload day caught up about 4-5 days later only to be rejected (for category  Yeah sure). So, I'm not sure how it works once the first shots are accepted in the db.


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineAussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1745 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2637 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Already 2shots in DB of it so dont think its priority now and screeners will probably leave it till they reach it in the que and screen it than.

User currently offlineJorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3149 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2628 times:

Quoting PHLapproach (Thread starter):
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...g/ready/USAA333N273AYPHL3-9-07.jpg

Looks soft to me so if screened priority it'll be rejected for sure.

georg


User currently offlinePHLapproach From Philippines, joined Mar 2004, 1243 posts, RR: 20
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2623 times:

Quoting Aussie18 (Reply 2):
Already 2shots in DB of it so dont think its priority now and screeners will probably leave it till they reach it in the que and screen it than.

It was still uploaded in that "24 hour" grace period that is mentioned on the page. If it's untrue, then that statement should be taken off. Or said "Does not apply after two shots have been accepted in the database". Though, atleast its not from SJU...

Quoting Jorge1812 (Reply 3):
Looks soft to me so if screened priority it'll be rejected for sure.

Unfortunately, I did it at a friends house who just got an LCD  Sad. Anyway I didnt post to get critiqued, which I knew I was gonna get anyway. Let's just leave it to the screeners.


User currently offlineAussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1745 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2599 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting PHLapproach (Reply 4):
Unfortunately, I did it at a friends house who just got an LCD . Anyway I didnt post to get critiqued, which I knew I was gonna get anyway. Let's just leave it to the screeners.

All he is doing is helping you,i agree it looks soft so instead of rushing it to get it priority screened and than get it rejected,wouldnt it be wiser to wait till you get home,do a better edit where you are more comfortable with monitor and upload that and wait the few extra days instead of rushing to try and get it accepted and find out it gets rejected.


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2582 times:

Quoting PHLapproach (Thread starter):
I marked it as priority...

Don't think the quality is sufficient, having two already in won't help either, 24 hrs or not.


User currently offlinePHLapproach From Philippines, joined Mar 2004, 1243 posts, RR: 20
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2566 times:

Quoting JeffM (Reply 6):
Don't think the quality is sufficient

I could not agree more. Since I got home, I took a look at it and it sure does look like crap. I'll delete it in a little bit.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Airways Star Alliance Aircrafts! posted Thu Sep 16 2004 12:31:52 by Lindy
Airline Names - USAir And US Airways posted Wed Mar 3 2004 03:03:04 by Planeboy
Scan Prints In BIG As Well? posted Tue Dec 23 2003 17:25:25 by YHU
British Airways Back In Old Colors? posted Tue Oct 8 2002 16:44:16 by Karlok
Should Photos Of Acft Not In DB Get Priority Check posted Sat Jun 23 2001 14:12:46 by 9A-CRO
British Airways B777 In San Diego posted Mon Mar 26 2001 06:29:22 by Coasterguy
Is Taking Pictures Of Planes In The US Illegal? posted Tue Apr 4 2006 02:58:16 by Stealth777
D200 Availability In The US posted Wed Jan 11 2006 10:48:30 by Skidmarks
Canon EOS 20D For $ 785 In The US? posted Sat Mar 26 2005 09:12:34 by Paulianer
Your Rights To Photograph In The US posted Sat Feb 12 2005 18:48:04 by Tonimr