EK20 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted
Wed Mar 14 2007 18:18:37 UTC (7 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1797 times:
It's a bit on the bright side!!!!! *removes sunglasses*
It's also leaning to the right and there's too much heat haze. [Edited 2007-03-14 18:19:23]
Bubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1195 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted
Wed Mar 14 2007 18:22:20 UTC (7 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1792 times:
Overexposed, contrast, soft, quality.
Sorry, it has little chance to make it.
ThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2070 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted
Wed Mar 14 2007 18:37:03 UTC (7 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1779 times:
The biggest issue here is heat haze. It's extending all over the aircraft. Too pity as it's really a great shot motivewise and without the heat haze it might have been salvageable for A.net.
"Go ahead...make my day"
Aviator1990 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted
Mon Mar 19 2007 21:51:39 UTC (7 years 6 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1689 times:
Well I think that the heat haze from the engines has made this picture unacceptable, but on the other hand there's nothing one can do about those huge engines. All i can say is try to get those heat hazes on a blue background or the blue sky so that it is not clearly visible.
LIPH From Italy, joined May 2004, 848 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted
Mon Mar 19 2007 21:59:00 UTC (7 years 6 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1686 times:
first thing I saw it's the heat distortion...This alone will make it a 100% rejection...
Life sucks. Then you die. Live fast, die young.