Is This Ok Quality? — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Is This Ok Quality?

KimV777 From Norway, joined Mar 2007, 6 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1742 times:

Hello.

I just wondering if these pictures are good, ore what i can do to improve them?

1.

All response is appreciated.

Regards:
Kim.

9 replies: All unread, jump to last

LIPH From Italy, joined May 2004, 848 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Kim,
are these original sizes ?

- The first one suffer from an odd crop and is also soft. A motive rejection then will surely be on the way. Why did you crop the nose that way ?

- Same for the second, even if the motive could be acceptable if the quality and the crop would be good. The aspect ratio for the picture must bemaintaned to the 3:2 standard. Yours is wierd.

Ciao

Life sucks. Then you die. Live fast, die young.

KimV777 From Norway, joined Mar 2007, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1734 times:

No, this is not the orginal size.

Chris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2814 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1722 times:

I think both will get rejected for quality as there is a lot of grain, they are soft, too much contrast and are dark.

Chris

5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII

JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1716 times:

They will get rejected for size. The aspect ratio is wrong.

KimV777 From Norway, joined Mar 2007, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1705 times:

Now I have done some changes to the picture size. is this better?

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 682 File size: 690kb

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 682 File size: 415kb

But can i do something about the quality and grain?

Regards:
Kim

JetJock22 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1702 times:

What iso speed are you shooting at?

KimV777 From Norway, joined Mar 2007, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1696 times:

On the first picture it's ISO 800 and the second it's ISO 200.

Regards:
Kim

JetJock22 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1691 times:

Quoting KimV777 (Reply 7):
On the first picture it's ISO 800 and the second it's ISO 200

That's part of the problem. Your iso should right around 100. Those speeds are too high and are causing your grain.

LIPH From Italy, joined May 2004, 848 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1652 times:

Quoting KimV777 (Reply 5):
But can i do something about the quality and grain?

Kim,
I don't think you can do much to imporve the quality there : a re-edit will surely brings the quality up, but not up to A.net standards....Remember always to shoot at the lowest ISO setting possible.

Ciao

Life sucks. Then you die. Live fast, die young.

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: