Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Bad Editing?  
User currently offlineJohnJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1690 posts, RR: 2
Posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1948 times:

Just got the following image kicked for bad editing:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20070329_af_fgspc_ain_1779.jpg

While I can't specifically recall what I did to this shot, for a simple overhead shot like this my normal workflow would have been to touch up dust spots (I have one pesky one that I can't get rid of), adjust the levels, then crop. I may have also used the white balance tool in the raw editor as well, but again I can't specifically recall. The shot didn't make it past the first round of screening, so there must be something pretty obvious that I'm missing.

In my mind, the two actions that I took that could have resulted in the editing reject are the white balance adjust and dust spot touch-up, but to my eyes things look OK in those areas. I'd like to re-submit the shot, but unless I know what to fix I don't see the point. Any thoughts?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9668 posts, RR: 68
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1941 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

very obvious use of the Shadow/Highlights tool under the wing.

The tool has worn away the reg and you can see where the tool was not used in the area of the wing closest to the engine pylon.


User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 30
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1940 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi John,

My guess would be the sky. On close scrutiny it shows a lot of 'artifacts' (sometimes wrongly referred to as 'too much JPG compression'), like you adjusted too much levels (including the sky) and maybe on top of that sharpened the sky, too.

Edit: Too slow, Royal beat me! There is a reason why he's a screaner...

[Edited 2007-03-29 18:55:30]


Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineJohnJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1690 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1898 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 1):
very obvious use of the Shadow/Highlights tool under the wing.

Actually, not. I have no idea how to use the Shadow/Highlights tool or where I'd even find it.


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9668 posts, RR: 68
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1895 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi John. I don't really know what to say. That was my first thought when I viewed the large image you provided in this thread.

Nothing to loose by appealing it, perhaps with a note that no editing was done.

Either that or maybe someone can help you with the original file. If you shot Nikon, or in JPEG I would be willing to have a go at it.

Cracking image, by the way.

Royal


User currently offlineAnder From Spain, joined Jan 2005, 367 posts, RR: 21
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1873 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 1):
very obvious use of the Shadow/Highlights tool under the wing

I wouldn't say it is that obvious. My guess is that AF maintenance covered the reg area when painting thus leaving a different tone area.
Cheers
Ander



Born to tri.
User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3064 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1870 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting JohnJ (Reply 3):
Actually, not. I have no idea how to use the Shadow/Highlights tool or where I'd even find it

I can believe that John. It does not surprise me that Royal pointed out the underside of the wing, as many of the screeners focus a lot on contrast issues and I know there is a general dislike of that tool in PS. But we cannot underestimate the effect of lighting in particular circumstances. I have a shot where many might be concerned about the use of that tool - I have never used it myself either - and the effect of the lighting in the photo below is solely due to the high reflectance of the surface that day; in my case due to the angle of the sun and snow on the ground - nothing to do with editing:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Markman


I think the editing rejection is harsh.

Paul


User currently offlineJRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4725 posts, RR: 50
Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1852 times:

Quoting Psych (Reply 6):
general dislike of that tool in PS

I think that it isn't as bad (PS3/LR have it in the raw converter now as well), but more the way it is used. It is a very powerful tool that can yield excelent results if you know how to use it.



For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
User currently offlineJohnJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1690 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1833 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 4):
Hi John. I don't really know what to say. That was my first thought when I viewed the large image you provided in this thread.

Not a problem - and thanks for replying to my thread (thanks everyone else, too, for the input). Perhaps the easiest thing to do at this point is use another shot from the sequence - I clicked off 4-5 of them and they all turned out OK.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Where's The Bad Editing? posted Mon Dec 12 2005 22:42:16 by Ptrjong
Blur In This Photo: On The Plane, Or Bad Editing? posted Tue Oct 11 2005 16:35:28 by Birdwatching
Unacceptable Editing Aka Bad Manipulation? posted Sun Jul 23 2006 05:18:30 by CallMeCapt
Photo Editing posted Thu Mar 22 2007 00:43:47 by Aviator1990
Help With Editing For A Rejection posted Sat Mar 17 2007 22:54:03 by Flipdewaf
Help Request With Editing posted Mon Mar 12 2007 21:45:20 by Walter2222
Editing Tips posted Mon Mar 12 2007 06:23:56 by LAXspotter
Editing Help Needed! posted Tue Mar 6 2007 14:38:52 by Alibo5NGN
Editing Help posted Sat Mar 3 2007 09:44:14 by LAXspotter
Help Editing posted Mon Feb 26 2007 19:40:59 by EGBJ