Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
I Like This Shot But...........  
User currently offlineDamien846 From UK - England, joined Dec 2006, 661 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 6 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2500 times:

I took this shot at RAF Musuem at Hendon back in January. All I have done is a little editing. Size crop etc.
But I can't get the Shapness right? The Reg under the wing does not look right?

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 683 File size: 555kb

Can anyone help or is it not worth it?
Regards
Damien

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBmiBaby737 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1814 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2482 times:

Looks good apart from it's unlevel and possibly slightly overexposed near the rear... ?

Bmi


User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2464 times:

Looks good to me either, and I agree on the overexposed issue too.
However, how do you notice if it´s unlevel in this case?

Cheers!
Lanas.-



"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2403 times:

A small adjustment on the shadow/highlights tool should fix that. I'd apply a tad more USM but other than that I think its fine.

As for level, I have no idea on what to use as reference. I'd probably get rid of some of that space at the front of the aircraft too so its the same as the rear. You'll get a centre otherwise!


User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (7 years 6 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2373 times:

Quoting Eadster (Reply 3):
I'd probably get rid of some of that space at the front of the aircraft too so its the same as the rear. You'll get a centre otherwise!

Forgot about that.  checkmark 

Cheers!
Lanas.-



"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offlineDamien846 From UK - England, joined Dec 2006, 661 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 6 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2346 times:

Quoting Eadster (Reply 3):
A small adjustment on the shadow/highlights tool should fix that. I'd apply a tad more USM but other than that I think its fine.

Next silly question what is USM?
Cheers
Damien


User currently offlineBmiBaby737 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1814 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (7 years 6 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2336 times:

Quoting Damien846 (Reply 5):
Next silly question what is USM?

Unsharp Mask



User currently offlineDamien846 From UK - England, joined Dec 2006, 661 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 6 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2326 times:

Of course it is! Silly me!
I had tried that but could not get it any better! I will however try again!
Cheers


User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (7 years 6 months 2 days ago) and read 2309 times:

My settings are as follows:

Amount: (adjust to what you think. Usually a reasonably high setting)
Radius: 0.2 pixels
Threshold: 0

This may help you out a bit!


User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (7 years 6 months 2 days ago) and read 2302 times:

Quoting Eadster (Reply 8):
My settings are as follows:

Amount: (adjust to what you think. Usually a reasonably high setting)
Radius: 0.2 pixels
Threshold: 0

Exactly like mine. I find the 0.2 pix radius very suitable and not so 'aggresive'. I use a reasonably high amount (400-500%) for my first pass of sharpening, then work on something lower for the following pass.
Hope it helps.  Smile

Cheers!
Lanas.-



"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offlineBmiBaby737 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1814 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (7 years 6 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2294 times:

Quoting Eadster (Reply 8):
Amount: (adjust to what you think. Usually a reasonably high setting)
Radius: 0.2 pixels
Threshold: 0

I too would recommend those settings! I use 0.3, however.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
I Like This Shot Alot.. posted Sat Dec 13 2003 00:44:19 by Klm
I Like This Photo, But... posted Sat Jan 5 2002 06:11:00 by Planedoctor
Would There Be Interest For A Shot Like This posted Mon Aug 21 2006 07:03:22 by JumboJim747
New Plane For An Airline... This Shot Good Enough? posted Thu Mar 15 2007 18:51:20 by Dvincent
Does Distance Kill This Shot? posted Sun Mar 11 2007 06:14:41 by Prat
Help With This Shot? posted Thu Mar 1 2007 07:52:17 by Damien846
Would This Shot Stand A Chance posted Sun Feb 25 2007 17:19:03 by McG1967
Is This Shot Salvageable? posted Wed Feb 21 2007 15:57:02 by Alibo5NGN
Foggy Conditions How Is This Shot? posted Wed Feb 7 2007 19:42:51 by Silver1SWA
What Can Be Done To Get This Shot In? posted Tue Jan 30 2007 00:40:30 by Monteycarlos