Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How Are These Pics  
User currently offlineIlikeflight From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 366 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2715 times:

Are these pics any good for the db if not is there anything that be done to bring them up to par???

Big version: Width: 1032 Height: 644 File size: 677kb


Big version: Width: 1570 Height: 1120 File size: 714kb
Big version: Width: 879 Height: 470 File size: 381kb
Big version: Width: 1242 Height: 962 File size: 1347kb
Big version: Width: 1280 Height: 851 File size: 690kb



Think Different
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIlikeflight From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 366 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2712 times:

I do plan to resize them before upload shoud they be good enough or they be salvageable


Think Different
User currently offlineFly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2703 times:

Hi,

the best thing to do to is to edit them as you would upload them and people on this forum will certainly help you out.
Heat haze killed #s 1 and 4.
#2 has a good chance I'd say.
#3 the quality isn't there, looks like a heavy crop.
#5 could be a motive problem, I'm not sure how "rare" this particular aircraft is.
Also when you crop your images, make sure your aspect ratio is either 3:2 or 4:3.

Ivan



Contrails Aviation Photography
User currently offlineIlikeflight From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 366 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2698 times:

Thanks anybody else

the reason I didn't edit before hand is that I wanted to get some opinions on what to do before I screw up a pic (I am still a little new at this)

Thanks again



Think Different
User currently offlineIlikeflight From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 366 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2653 times:

Anybody Else all comments are greatly appreciated


Think Different
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 5, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2639 times:

The second one is the best one. I would not upload the others.


Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineIlikeflight From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 366 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2619 times:

Thanks

Anybody Else???



Think Different
User currently offlineJetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2779 posts, RR: 33
Reply 7, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2618 times:

I would agree. Your best bet is the second one.

-Matt



No info
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4783 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2602 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would say none of them have a chance, sorry, Not even the second one because it is overexposed.


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineAC773 From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 1730 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2592 times:

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 8):
I would say none of them have a chance

I'd have to agree with that. The second one is still soft, even after being downsized to 1024 and sharpened.



Better to be nouveau than never to have been riche at all.
User currently offlineBoeingfreak From Germany, joined May 2005, 398 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (7 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2592 times:

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 8):
I would say none of them have a chance, sorry, Not even the second one because it is overexposed

 checkmark   checkmark   checkmark 

It is also very soft (looks like it suffers from heathaze) and shows some noticable purple halos around the nose and the main gear.

Hope this helps,
Florian  wave 


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Are These Flight Decks Pics? posted Thu Jun 29 2006 01:03:19 by Phxplanes
Are These Pics Any Good? posted Tue Mar 27 2007 00:50:58 by Tristarfreak
Fallen Out Of Practice, How Are These? posted Sun Jan 7 2007 01:40:00 by Graphic
I Think I'm Getting It...how Are These? posted Thu Jan 4 2007 12:12:40 by Silver1SWA
Are These Pics Up To A.net Standard? posted Sat Dec 9 2006 05:39:51 by Acontador
Are These Pics Good Enough? posted Mon Aug 28 2006 10:14:15 by Robban75
Are These Pics Ruined? posted Wed Aug 2 2006 11:18:23 by Robban75
Hey Guys, How Are These? posted Wed Nov 2 2005 02:43:19 by Silver1SWA
Are These Pics Good, Or Worthless Trash? posted Fri Aug 17 2001 07:05:16 by Kcle
How Are These? posted Sun Sep 3 2000 22:31:04 by USAir_757