Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lens Advice Required  
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1977 posts, RR: 7
Posted (7 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2427 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi all,

A Russian friend of mine, an aspiring aviation photographer, asked me for a favour, which is to ask for an advice for him here. He wants to buy a new lens, and he would like some opinions from the seasoned A.net photographers. As for the picture quality, he has A.net standards in mind, and he thinks this forum would be the best place to ask this sort of questions.

His options are the Canon 70-300 4-5.6 IS USM, Canon 75-300 4-5.6 IS USM, or Sigma 50-500, he needs to decide on one of them.

He works at an airport, so he can get fairly close to aircraft, but he also takes quite a few pictures at a fair distance, in wide range of different weather and at night.

Any input would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers,
Andrei

[Edited 2007-04-27 03:40:11]

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAC773 From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 1730 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2410 times:

Quoting Chukcha (Thread starter):
70-300 4-5.6 IS USM, Canon 75-300 4-5.6 IS USM

Those are different generations of the same lens. The 70-300 isn't bad for the price, but your friend should keep far away from the 75-300. The 50-500 is a really nice lens, but I would think he might want something more useful without having to use a tripod in low light.

My suggestion? If he can afford the 50-500, then he can afford the lens he really should have: the Canon 70-200 f/2.8L. If he has any aspirations of taking this to a professional level, there are really few other options - certainly none at that price.



Better to be nouveau than never to have been riche at all.
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 29
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2409 times:

Quoting AC773 (Reply 1):
My suggestion? If he can afford the 50-500, then he can afford the lens he really should have: the Canon 70-200 f/2.8L. If he has any aspirations of taking this to a professional level, there are really few other options - certainly none at that price.

Probably isn't far off the price of the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS.

Of the three lenses, I'd got the Sigma.



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2382 times:

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 2):
Probably isn't far off the price of the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS.

And that's one extremely popular glass amongst aviation photographers.  thumbsup 


User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1977 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (7 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2370 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks, guys.

To sum it all up, I can tell him that 70-300 4-5.6 IS USM is a good lens for the price, 75-300 - no good, Sigma 50-500 is a bit heavy without a tripod, right? And two other good options - Canon 70-200 f/2.8L and EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS...

Cheers,
Andrei


User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2367 times:

Quoting Chukcha (Reply 4):
Canon 70-200 f/2.8L and EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS...

The 70-200 is a good lens, especially for low-light photography. It's fine for av photography, but lacks range a bit. It's possible to add a 1.4x to get a 98-280mm f/4, and a 2x to get a 140-400mm f/5.6, but I'd rather buy the 100-400, which is a very good lens for av photography (at least IMO). I've got little experience with the 70-200 f/2.8L, so owners of that lens should tell you about it.


User currently offlineDazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2889 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (7 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2362 times:

I use the 75-300 IS USM and the 50-500. The 75-300 IS USM is a great lens to begin with, nice and light and easy to use but the 50-500 is far sharper and has a superior range of focal lengths. I rarely take it off the camera these days because it covers most situations and dust on the sensor is less of a worry. Its not a lens you can just put on the camera and use though, it takes some getting used to. I use a monopod in low light situations but when the sun shines, I find it easy enough to hand hold even at 500mm (been doing that today!).

For example:

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 683 File size: 335kb

This was taken at 417mm with the 50-500 hand held as she climbs away from Liverpool's runway 09.

Darren

[Edited 2007-04-27 17:19:59]


Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lens Advice: Is Or Not? posted Thu May 11 2006 01:41:50 by AC773
Lens Advice posted Tue Mar 28 2006 16:42:04 by TV840
Need Some Nikon Lens Advice posted Wed Mar 8 2006 19:37:34 by UnattendedBag
Copyright On Old Photos - Advice Required posted Sat Sep 3 2005 08:27:35 by Poolehk
Need Some Lens Advice! :-) posted Mon Feb 21 2005 16:21:06 by Jran225
Lens Advice posted Thu Jan 27 2005 12:28:31 by Coa764
20D Lens... Help Required. posted Wed Dec 15 2004 23:09:32 by LHRSIMON
28-300 Lens Advice Please posted Sun Dec 5 2004 16:57:28 by Manzoori
Canon 100-400 L IS, Advice Required :-) posted Wed May 26 2004 09:31:47 by Jkw777
Nikon Lens Advice posted Wed May 26 2004 07:29:56 by N228ua