ANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3233 posts, RR: 14 Reply 1, posted (6 years 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2015 times:
I see two problems with this image.
Firstly, the crop is a little off. You need to add more space above the plane so that the top of the fuselage is in the picture.
Also, your picture is too tall. Your image is 1024x780, and the rules on airliners.net say it must be between 683 and 768 pixels tall (between a 3:2 and a 4:3 aspect ratio) if it is 1024 pixels wide.
So I would add space above the aircraft and add a little more of the fuselage into the image.
Otherwise, great shot.
TIS
www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
Boeingfreak From Germany, joined May 2005, 398 posts, RR: 6 Reply 2, posted (6 years 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2009 times:
Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 1): Firstly, the crop is a little off. You need to add more space above the plane so that the top of the fuselage is in the picture.
Also, your picture is too tall. Your image is 1024x780, and the rules on airliners.net say it must be between 683 and 768 pixels tall (between a 3:2 and a 4:3 aspect ratio) if it is 1024 pixels wide.
You cut right through the first passenger window and the 'm' of 'SmartWings' + my eyes quickly moved to the pilot...
If you sum it up it is a correct rejection that doesn't need to be appealed.
WakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1288 posts, RR: 18 Reply 3, posted (6 years 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1999 times:
1024X780 is ok with the A.net bar at the bottom which is 12 pixels wide. 780 - 12 = 768
WakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1288 posts, RR: 18 Reply 5, posted (6 years 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1947 times:
I also forgot to mention the pilot. Don't write any comments about the pilot giving the peace sign. That would lead to a motive rejection as well.
-Matt