Neilnvc From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (8 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3513 times:
This is my first post, and I just hope to be posting in the right forum, anyways I was wondering, I wanted to start taking pictures for airliners.net of course and was wondering if to begin my Sony DSC-H1 with a 12x optical zoom 5.1 mp is good enough for this site. And btw if anyone is from YUL, I am a half way through my training as a IFR Air Traffic Controller here in YUL, so let me know if you are near YUL or a YUL controller.
TedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3500 times:
The answer is: It depends.
If your going to be taking lots of pictures of static aircraft that you are near in broad daylight, you'll probably be ok. BUT if you want more flexibility (distance and action); you'll have to go bigger.
I got a D80 (with the two lens kit) and it's been a wonderful camera. I ended up getting a Quantray 70-300 and I haven't looked back.
My advice is go to DPreview.com, read about DSLRs and ignore what the Nikon(myself) and Cannon cheerleaders have to say. Choose the best you can afford that YOU like.
Also remember that while the camera does SOME work, it's ultimately your picture, and you HAVE to edit it after taking the shot.
Lanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3496 times:
Welcome to the forum!!! Yes, this is the place where this topics are discussed.
So, regarding your camera, I guess it´s fine for the site, maybe not the best, but it can produce good results as long as you know how to handle it. If you have a manual function it will be good to learn how to use it because that way you´ll get the best out of your equipment. Also, I believe the glass in these new Sonys is quite good (Zeiss glass if i´m not wrong).
It would be great if you posted some of your shots.
"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
AussieAviator From Australia, joined Jul 2006, 78 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3387 times:
Hi there Neil,
As an amateur/enthusiast "photographer", I would have to suggest that in the first instance; you should consider buying the best Digital SLR camera you can afford. I don't mean spend upwards of $15,000 for one, but at least consider something like the Canon EOS 400D or Nikon D40/50. Many of the newer model DSLR cameras are becoming increasingly affordable. I would personally suggest you should consider sticking with either the Canon or Nikon brand.
Their respective camera equipment is simply brilliant.
There will always be the Canon-v-Nikon rivalry, but in reality, both companies produce the highest quality equipment.
Sony and Olympus are fast catching up though !
When i decided to enter the digital foray, I purchased a Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ-30. This was my first BIG mistake ! I found this lower end type of equipment suffers serious limitations, especially at night and with high ISO settings.
I wish I had have contributed the money towards a decent DSLR in the first instance!
I am now going to buy a Nikon D80 with some additional lenses.
As you are just starting out, it might be prudent to consider purchasing a DSLR second hand - from a reputable dealer, or from eBay? If you can score a good deal, say on a Canon EOS 300/350D - then this will be a great platform to learn on, yet still be able to produce stunning results!
Be aware of the current 'prosumer' type camera equipment. No matter what the sales person may tell you, these cameras aren't quite DSLR quality - yet, that is!
A DSLR camera will offer you a greater 'f-stop' (aperture) range; shutter speeds; ISO settings and other goodies.
The only real dilemma with DSLR's is keeping the sensor dust free - assuming the user is changing lenses often.
Well, that's my contribution mate. Good luck! I hope ATC training goes well for you too.
Neilnvc From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3331 times:
Hey, Thanx everyone for the replys really appreciate it, to be honest I don't really know much about photography so I guess for now I'll wait to finish my training and save up some money when im done with training and buy a better camera and pay myself some lessons, but do you think there is anything to do with this picture??? I honestly think that the overall quality is not good enough and that the picture is maybe too bright anyways, thanx again later,
Yep. It's soft, grainy, and the top of the fuselage is blown out. It's good that you recognize flaws in your picture though, because it's through that that you learn what to do next time.
As for a camera, you really don't want to bother with anything less that a DSLR if you're serious about taking action shots for A.net. Something like the Canon 350D (Rebel XT) or 400D (Rebel XTi) or the Nikon D40x (not the D40) would be great to start with.
Quoting TedTAce (Reply 1): I ended up getting a Quantray 70-300 and I haven't looked back.
Please don't take this personally Ted as that's not how this is intended but...
The Quantaray 70-300 has its upsides and it's a good lens if you already have one, but it's also very slow and very noisy. For the same money, you can have superior lens with about the same zoom range from companies like Sigma, Canon, or Nikon. Each of them offer this type of lens for about $150 USD.
Better to be nouveau than never to have been riche at all.
Neilnvc From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3268 times:
Quoting AC773 (Reply 8): Yep. It's soft, grainy, and the top of the fuselage is blown out. It's good that you recognize flaws in your picture though, because it's through that that you learn what to do next time.
I see what the problems are but I am not sure how to fix them, what causes the picture to be grainy ??? Is it me that is moving too much while taking the picture or is it wrong settings with my camera at it's maximum zoom or is it just my camera at that zoom that isn't performing well ???
Yeap, it's in part more slow b/c it very often has to reset the focus from scratch going all the way out of focus then back. It also make more noise then a busted chainsaw, but when your being upstaged by an F-15e @ full afterburner, no one tends to notice but if you can overlook those quirks, it's a DECENT lens for what it does.
Quoting Neilnvc (Reply 9): Is it me that is moving too much while taking the picture
Quoting Neilnvc (Reply 9): is it wrong settings with my camera at it's maximum zoom or is it just my camera at that zoom that isn't performing well ???
Has to do with several factors, too much light, movement and most af all, camera settings -maybe not your case, but it can be a damaged sensor- , if you´re using the sony, with much light it tends to do some grain, but with the sony let it shot with the P selected -program of the camera- if you´re taking shots at night, you can use the M -manual setings- to do the shot.
Life is what happens when you have other plans.....