Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What If To Choose: Canon 500mm Or Sigma 300-800mm?  
User currently offlineXenon From Belgium, joined Aug 2001, 494 posts, RR: 12
Posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 6228 times:

Hi all,

Consider you can choose:

A Canon 500mm or a Sigma 300-800mm?

Whitch one would you choose and why?

Thx,

Daniel


AirTeamImages -ATI-
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNSMike From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 255 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 6204 times:

I bought the Canon 500 F4L IS.

I can't imagine being able to hand-hold the Sigmonster...

Mike



Pearl Snares, Taye Drums, Sabian Cymbals, Remo Heads, Los Cabos Sticks
User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5715 posts, RR: 44
Reply 2, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 6202 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I am not convinced at this level that the advice you get online(anywhere not just at A.net) is that meaningful.
For my money I would be trying them both out and for this kind of purchase a retailer that would not allow me to do that would not be getting their hands on my credit card(like my credit card could handle that purchase)

But since you asked, I would be going with the 500 prime and perhaps the 1.4TC for the occaisions I needed more, but that depends on how much of your planned usage would need less that 500mm.

I have my needs below 500mm pretty well covered.

Too many questions, too little info.

Cheers



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineJavibi From Spain, joined Oct 2004, 1371 posts, RR: 41
Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 6141 times:

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 2):
Too many questions, too little info

 checkmark 

What are you shooting? Where are you shooting? What type of shots?

j



"Be prepared to engage in constructive debate". Are YOU prepared?
User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 6136 times:

Chris makes a good point here. See if you can hire them out first and then make a decision. This is some serious money that you are parting with, more than the price of some cars, so do the homework!! You are not going to buy a car without test driving it are you!
Personaly I would go for the prime as the optics would be a lot better and I don't feel there is a need for me to go to 800mm and if I did well the 1.4TC would bring me up to 700/5.6 and still have AF I might be 100mm short but I won't loose any sleep over it! Big grin
I own the 500/4 and love it. I use if for my wildlife photography and when I can, some sports as well.

Have fun

Fergul  sun 



Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlineTS-IOR From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 3488 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6115 times:

You want to shoot actors in Cannes from Belgium  Wink

I'll go for the 300-800mm definitely !!!


User currently offlineTin67 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 268 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6112 times:

I'll add my twopence.

When you are spending that kind of money and you are not sure, you can only try them out for yourself to ensure they meet your requirements. I can offer some past experience when looking to buy a 300 prime where I went Sigma initially, but soon went back to Canon.

Before anyone out shoots me down! I must stress again that this is a personal experience and does not represent Sigma lenses as a whole.

3 years ago I wanted a 300mm prime and had 2 lenses in mind. Sigma 300 EX f/2.8 and the Canon 300 f/4 IS L. I didn't get the chance to try the Canon, but at a show I was able to test the Sigma and it appeared to be a good lens. I bought one!

Optically I could not fault it, the results were excellent. However there were downfalls that soon became apparent. The autofocus was awful. It would hunt, it was slow and if shooting through a fence, as there was no AF distance settings it kept hunting and the shot was lost. I thought I'd just have to live with that, but then the lens casing near to the drop in filter became lose and internal lens seals starting dropping on to the optics. I contacted LCE Southampton where I bought it and they requested I took it back immediately. They offered me a replacement and when I mentioned I was not happy with the AF and would like to try a Canon they suggested I took this one for a week and if not happy come back for a refund or swap. I took it to Duxford and got some great results, but the AF was still very poor, I had also lost confidence in the product. I went back to the LCE tried a Canon 300 f/4. The difference was amazing, the AF was pin point and fast so I changed.

I remained happy with that lens and recently upgraded to the Canon 300 f/2.8 IS L and that is simply superb.

I can't believe that all the large Sigmas are like the one I had, I had a bad one but that experience sticks and I wouldn't spend that kind of money on another. My Canon 300 f/2.8 cost me double the price of the Sigma, but it was well worth it in my mind. I am also confident that if I ever sell the Canon, I know I'll get a good price. I've sold other L glass and there is always a good demand for well looked after L lenses. I wouldn't share the same confidence selling a Sigma.

Ultimately it's your choice and this should really be made on the basis of which lens meets your requirements and through testing them extensively, not just for 10 minutes in a store. You wouldn't spend €6-7k on a car without driving it first.

Regards
Martin


User currently offlineXenon From Belgium, joined Aug 2001, 494 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 6077 times:

All,

Thx so far.
I was just looking for future quality glass. (mainly for aviation)

My main concern is that, 'I think', feel prisonned with a prime... The thought not able to zoom scares me...

Cheers,

Daniel



AirTeamImages -ATI-
User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 8, posted (7 years 5 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 6063 times:

Quoting Xenon (Reply 7):
The thought not able to zoom scares me...

Don't worry, it's not so bad, Big grin We like it here in the Prime section.  wink 

You just have to be more creative that's all.  bouncy 

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Fergul Mc Clean (Mac Photography)
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Fergul Mc Clean (Mac Photography)



If that's what's bothereing you then maybe you should look at the 100-400 L can't see you needing 300-800 for aviation.

Take care

Fergul  sun 



Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlineXenon From Belgium, joined Aug 2001, 494 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (7 years 5 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 6056 times:

Fergul,

I already own a Sigma 50-500 and realy love the 500mm  Smile

Daniel



AirTeamImages -ATI-
User currently offlineTS-IOR From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 3488 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (7 years 5 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 6036 times:

What about the 504mm of the new bridge Olympus SP550UZ ?!

Certainly it's not a SLR, but is there any comparison that could be made ?

I think it's huge to have 500mm (18x zoom) with a compact !!!


User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 11, posted (7 years 5 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 6036 times:

Quoting Xenon (Reply 9):
I already own a Sigma 50-500 and realy love the 500mm

Never used it, but from fellow photographers who have its meant to be an excellent lens. Good luck with your choice, hope you make the right one. But talking from a 500/4 owner, I love it. Quality is simply stunning.

Take care

Fergul  sun 



Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlineGust From Belgium, joined Oct 2001, 148 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 5 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5987 times:

Quoting Xenon (Reply 7):
'I think', feel prisonned with a prime... The thought not able to zoom scares me...

Daniel,Don't worry,once prime always prime.

Quoting Xenon (Reply 9):
already own a Sigma 50-500 and realy love the 500mm

Go to the airport for a couple hours and shoot only at 500mm.

grt,
Airwim (a happy canon 500 F/4 L IS user)


User currently offlineIngemarE From Sweden, joined Mar 2005, 285 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (7 years 5 months 6 days ago) and read 5931 times:

Having tried the Sigma 300-800 out, I must tell you it's an awesome lens!!
That goes for picture quality as well as size,....because seriously man.....this is one mother of a lens!!!  bigthumbsup 

However, if you intend on using it for av-photography, I'd have to say it's not the best choice.
I'll give you a couple of reasons;
#1: It's huge.
#2: It weighs a lot!!
#3: You will need a tripod. (This reduces your ability to chose and follow targets.)
#4: No optical stabilization. (Don't underestimate the difficulty of keeping the lens still @ 800mm!)
#5: You will probably not have much use for the 800mil's anyway, since heat-haze have a tendency to ruin long distance shots.

Apart from this,....its fantastic and I'd really recommend it if you're doing lots of wildlife photography.



In thrust I trust.
User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (7 years 5 months 6 days ago) and read 5928 times:

My friend has a the 500 mm and it's heavy, but he doesn't use a tripod. He often adds the 1.4 teleconverter to the lens.

What about the 400 mm ?

KS/codeshare



How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 15, posted (7 years 5 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 5902 times:

Quoting IngemarE (Reply 13):
#2: It weighs a lot!!
#3: You will need a tripod.

http://www.sigma-photo.com/lenses/le...ll_details.asp?id=3308&navigator=3
Comming in at just under 5.9Kg you would want a strong arm!!  Must check the spec on my Monopod!

Quick question to those who own the Bigma, 50-500/4-6.3, do you still have AF on the 30D and less, bodies at the 500 end. If I am not mistaken, the smallest aperture the Canon bodies will AF is f5.6, anything bigger, i.e. 6.3 and above you are down to MF, just curious!

Have fun Daniel!!   

Fergul   

[Edited 2007-05-23 14:17:43]


Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlineXenon From Belgium, joined Aug 2001, 494 posts, RR: 12
Reply 16, posted (7 years 5 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 5833 times:

Hi,

Thx for all the replies!

Difficult...  Smile

Daniel



AirTeamImages -ATI-
User currently offlineTin67 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 268 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (7 years 5 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5822 times:

Quoting Fergulmcc (Reply 15):
If I am not mistaken, the smallest aperture the Canon bodies will AF is f5.6

Hi Fergul,

I "think" f/6.3 is okay, it's f/8 where the D30s etc stop autofocussing.

Martin


User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 18, posted (7 years 5 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5817 times:

Quoting Tin67 (Reply 17):
it's f/8 where the D30s etc stop autofocussing.

I do know that the 20D won't Af at f8 Martin. I only know this as when you put a x2TC on a 300/4 you only have MF and from some of the technical data that I have read, can't remember where, but it does say that above f5.6 you have MF. I do know that the 1D cameras can AF up to f8 due to their complex AF system.

Anyway it's not critical, I was just curious.

Thanks

Fergul  sun 



Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What To Choose...? Mm's Or Pure L Quality? posted Thu May 20 2004 04:03:40 by Xenon
Canon L Lens 100-400mm Or Sigma 50-500mm? posted Thu Dec 12 2002 07:05:15 by Tsentsan
Does Sigma Have An Equivalent To The Canon L? posted Tue Mar 6 2007 16:21:09 by YHU
28-300: Tamron Or Sigma? posted Tue Apr 25 2006 21:04:37 by Andz
Looking To Buy An Epson Or Canon Printer. Help!? posted Mon Sep 26 2005 01:37:18 by Tappan
Canon 300D...or What's Better For The Price? posted Tue Dec 28 2004 11:38:25 by Andz
Hit Rate Or Database,what Way To Go? posted Thu Sep 2 2004 11:56:24 by LHRSIMON
Lens Ask :canon 70-200 Or Sigma 70-200 posted Wed May 5 2004 18:28:00 by Gust
70-200mm: Canon Or Sigma? posted Thu Mar 4 2004 05:48:31 by Airbus Lover
Canon Or Sigma? posted Mon Feb 16 2004 19:21:29 by Finnair MD-11
What Lens To Buy? 50-500mm / 100-400mm Etc posted Mon Aug 30 2010 06:06:00 by markevans
What Lens To Complement Canon 100-400? posted Tue Apr 19 2005 11:47:09 by Gerardo
Canon 17-40mm Or Sigma 150-500mm? posted Sun Nov 7 2010 13:32:54 by erikgrinsvall
What To Choose...? Mm's Or Pure L Quality? posted Thu May 20 2004 04:03:40 by Xenon
Canon L Lens 100-400mm Or Sigma 50-500mm? posted Thu Dec 12 2002 07:05:15 by Tsentsan
Can't Decide - 100-400 L Or Sigma 100-300 F4 EX? posted Sat Nov 28 2009 07:07:30 by JakTrax
What Happens To My Upload Slots If...? posted Wed Aug 26 2009 05:33:27 by JakTrax
My First Camera, What To Choose? posted Tue Jan 13 2009 15:23:57 by MikeCyrus
Canon EF100-300 Or EF70-300 Is? posted Thu Nov 13 2008 07:33:09 by JakTrax
Does Sigma Have An Equivalent To The Canon L? posted Tue Mar 6 2007 16:21:09 by YHU