Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Centring Issues  
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1664 posts, RR: 62
Posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2538 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

In the thread headed 'level discussion' by Thierry, at Reply 19 Psych raises an issue that is close to my heart, poor centring with a certain type of photograph and that is the gratuitous, unnecessary cropping of fins. This, much of the time is simply a fashionable but poor composition. I have often rejected for this reason but always with a personal. I am linking to two photographs below which illustrate my point both by another photographer. Before anyone goes screaming about such use, I have discussed this issue with Colin and have his consent.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hines
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hines



You can see that in the Air Malta the fin has been cropped yet there is ample space below the aircraft to have included it. If we accept that the fin is actually part of the aircraft then it is hard to justify cropping it this way - the aircraft is in fact so high in the frame that part of it is missing. I stand by my comment that this is merely a fashion and if part of the nose was clipped in the same way, few would even consider uploading. Using the same criteria, the Lufthansa is a little high but acceptable - taken from the same spot this simply serves to demonstrate the unneccessary nature of the crop.

I will use one of Paul's (Psych) to perfectly illustrate my idea of what is acceptable with a fin crop - the nosewheel is close to the bottom of the frame with the fuselage filling the frame. One of my own is also shown here, from long before I started to screen

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Markman
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mick Bajcar



I expect howls about screener inconsistency here and have to accept that criticism. Colin felt confusion and I have addressed that with him I am hoping for some discussion and perhaps a chance to correct this problem. The rules are already there, motive and centring.

How do others feel please

Mick Bajcar

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2514 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

HI Mick
I'm with you on the centring and your examples are fine and justified in what your pointing out.
I have always uploaded shots with much the same criteria.
But i do have a shot that I'm to upload i would have to do what Colin has done in the first shot of the air Malta shot as part of the tail is missing from the original crop .
How would screeners tackle an issue when a proper crop is not possible.?
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineLennymuir From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2002, 434 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2502 times:

Mick

Looks like you are trying to form a personal opinion that others should follow
rather than consult the photographers, which is how I'm reading it.

Shouldn't you get a complete concensus with your fellow screeners
before posing?

Gerry


User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3906 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2470 times:

Well, I think Mick is to be applauded for discussing, as a screener, an issue here on which screeners are obviously not flying 100% in formation.

Personally I agree with him. Cutting the tailfin is fine when the rest of the aircraft is filling the frame, just as cutting the wings is fine when the rest of the aircraft is filling the frame. But how can you justify cutting off a rather important part of a plane when there's dead space in the bottom of the frame? It looks most horrible on T-tailers because you lose the horizontail tailplane too, but it looks bad enough with any aircraft.

I think people do this in the mistaken belief that they're required by a.net or by whoever to vertically center the fuselage in their photos. Or it happens by accident, because you tend to keep the fuselage central in your viewfinder when that taxiing plane is coming closer and closer. Well, then you blew that shot.

Peter 

[Edited 2007-05-29 15:26:43]


The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2459 times:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hines


It could be argued that Colins first photo of the Air Malta, the body is in the center of the frame and therefore is acceptable. When I am centering a side on shot I do not take into account, well not too much, the tail of the plane. I generally center the body. Here cutting the tail is unavoidable as are in yours and Paul's shot Mick but if you look, both the bodies are in the center of the frame.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hines


However I feel that Colins second shot is a little low in the frame judging by the body of the aircraft. This is the dilema Mick!   

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 3):
Well, I think Mick is to be applauded for discussing, as a screener, an issue here on which screeners are obviously not flying 100% in formation.

 checkmark 

Take care

Fergul   


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Markman



PS: Dam nice shot Paul!!    (Dr. Worm)  

[Edited 2007-05-29 15:47:32]


Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1664 posts, RR: 62
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2400 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting Fergulmcc (Reply 4):
It could be argued that Colins first photo of the Air Malta, the body is in the center of the frame and therefore is acceptable. When I am centering a side on shot I do not take into account, well not too much, the tail of the plane.

Fergul
That is precisely the problem. It is difficult to justify the aircraft touching, indeed extending beyond the edge of the frame when there is so much space below it. I do not feel that centring using just the windows is acceptable, the whole aircraft, teh whole image needs to be considered. Ignoring the fin is to ignore a part of the aircraft

Quoting Lennymuir (Reply 2):
Shouldn't you get a complete concensus with your fellow screeners before posting?

Gerry, there has been discussion amongst the screeners but no real concensus. The purpose of this thread was to seek the opinions of the people uploading. Your opinions are important to us !
Mick


User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2393 times:

Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 5):
Ignoring the fin is to ignore a part of the aircraft

Point taken Mick

Fergul  sun 



Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12407 posts, RR: 46
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2375 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

My personal preference is to always include all of the tail. A lot of how I compose and crop the shot depends on the size of the plane and the angle it's at.

For a larger plane it is possible to get a nicely composed "close up" that includes all the tail but still looks balanced (even though the fuselage is in the lower half of the frame):

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley



At a shallower angle, where the apparent length of the fuselage is greatly reduced, is where the "issues" start to arise:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley


I'm sure some would argue that these images are badly composed and are not balanced. However, my preference is to include all the tail.

At extremely shallow angles, it becomes difficult to crop close to the fuselage without chopping the tail. IMHO, the KLM looks more balanced (and somewhat more dramatic because of the closer crop) than the Aeroflot, but there isn't a lot in it:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley



In the end, if both options are acceptable motive, it comes down to personal preference. As stated, mine is to include the tail, however, I do appreciate in extreme circumstance, this can leave the shot open to criticism of being unbalanced.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1293 posts, RR: 28
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2347 times:

Military pilots are always helpful when you want to take a closer crop:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Walter Van Bel



I have not yet seen an airliner do this...  Smile

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2347 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I want to begin my post by heartily congratulating Mick on starting this thread, and Colin for consenting to allow his images to be picked apart. Far from any complaining about screener inconsistency I feel this shows a mature, non-defensive attitude and a preparedness to debate issues here where there is not 100% consensus. Oh for more of that - surely one of the fundamental reasons for this Forum.

As Mick stated at the outset, it seems he and I both share a view on this particular point. Personally I would go further and say I can see no justification - photographically speaking - for having the subject squeezed in to the top half of the frame, with nothing much in the bottom. My hunch is that many - as suggested by Thierry in his recent thread - assume that A.net require the fuselage to be centred. I would like to see some further guidance on this because, for me, having such variety of acceptable centring when the tail is complete, but right at the top of the frame, or cropped out, rather diminishes the rigour with which this criterion can be applied at other times.

Clearly the motive is central (excuse the pun) to deciding how to centre your image. But if the shot is basically of a plane on the ground, and it is not a motivated close up, then I vote for not chopping the tail off, and also not having much space below the wheels, like this:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Markman


...or balancing the space below the wheels with that above the top of the tail of the angle/crop does not allow. i.e. treating the aircraft as a complete object, from wheels to fin, not just as a fuselage, like so:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Markman


But I would go further and say that shots like the following are too high in the frame - and to show no bias I shall choose one from my esteemed colleague's excellent collection - Mick is big enough, in every regard, to take it:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mick Bajcar


Very interesting discussion - makes the Forum worth reading.

All the best.

Paul


User currently offlineLennymuir From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2002, 434 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2327 times:

I get the message Mick, but I know my opinion won't change your mind since you
already have a prejudice against certain types of composition, as you have shown.  Big grin

You may call it gratuitous, unnecessary cropping of fins that is in vogue.
That's fine, for those who like that type of composition.
I also understand why you don't like it.

Are you trying to editorially drive an acceptable composition for such shots to form
a 'standard' for this site rather than allowing each picture to be judged on its merits?

Perhaps I am far too cynical, or I have lost my enthusiasm, but heaven forfend
I have to remind myself to take great care cropping a picture for a.net, yet allow
my creative juices to flow for 'other' sites and publications.

That is what was crossing my mind.
Things in here are tight enough, yet the noose is getting tighter still.

Gerry


 duck 


User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1742 posts, RR: 11
Reply 11, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2322 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Of course, the wings and horizontal stabs are part of the aircraft too, but we're all okay with cropping them out when necessary.

Myself, I can see cropping the tail when it plays a low importance in composition. There gets to be certain angles when the tail just isn't central, like on the two photos Mick put in his first post. I don't begrudge people who choose to show the whole airplane; it is their perogative and who am I to tell them not to?

Steve's KLM MD11 also shows a good case of where it's permissible to clip the tail slightly, because the tail just isn't a large part of the frame and he at least leaves the whole KLM logo. The arrangement of engines, wings, cockpit glass, and nose create the draw of the image, and the tail is a less important visual element, it can afford to be cropped out.

Paul's other 747 is a prime example where absolute centering would not, IMO, be permissible because it just has very excellent organization of elements in the frame, between the shape of the plane itself, the tail, windowline, et cetera. While the airplane is not "centered" in the strict term of bottom of fuselage to top of fuselage, it is a combination of lines and shapes that works well as a photograph, not to mention the placement of elements in prime frame areas. The overall fuselage is only one piece of the puzzle.

Let's not forget that the good use of "empty space" (not to be confused with dead space, which is a term I think gets manhandled around here) is a technique itself in art, and the proper usage of it helps create interest. Mick can like what he likes, but I think the choice of Colin's 757 as a "bad" fin crop isn't a fair one, as the nose/forward section is clearly the more important visual element. After all, portrait photographers do not get chastized for cropping below the bust.

[Edited 2007-05-30 03:23:55]


From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1742 posts, RR: 11
Reply 12, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2311 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Arr, why did I type 757 in there? I meant A320, I really did. Sorry Colin!  duck 


From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1294 posts, RR: 17
Reply 13, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2305 times:

For me it depends on the image. I have done both, but always feel that including the whole tail takes away from the focus of the body/nose of the aircraft, especially in a head on/close to head on shot. Including the whole tail makes the photo look unbalanced to me. This thread really seems to come down to personal preference. I don't think there should/could be a hardfast rule regarding this type of centering, especially with what seems to be many varying opinions.
-Matt



Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineMx330 From Mexico, joined Oct 2002, 827 posts, RR: 13
Reply 14, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2300 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

wow!
Nice thread here!

I feel kind of weird and can´t really decide on what side to fall.

Tough I get Mick´s point and understand it, I also feel some shots are better with the fin cropped.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hines
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Markman



Colin's shot looks great to me, being centered vertically can also be important from time to time.
Paul's shot, I also love it, but I could say there is too much sky and empty frame...

Hard to decide, I would say there is no rule here, its all to the photographers criteria really, and that's what counts! Variety is important here, imagine a database with all the shots having the same crop rules.

Or just invent the new bad_crop rejection  Big grin  Big grin  Big grin

Greetings

Juan APM



All Canon! EOS 5D mk III, 8mm, 17-40, 24-105, 70-200 f2.8, 100-400L
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1664 posts, RR: 62
Reply 15, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2282 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting Lennymuir (Reply 10):
Are you trying to editorially drive an acceptable composition for such shots to form
a 'standard' for this site rather than allowing each picture to be judged on its merits?

Let me start with this point, a good point.
Gerry. If an image works with an unusual crop or composition, then no, I am not suggesting that it should be rejected. What I am saying is that it rarely does - the Air Malta at the start is the perfect example of what I object to, even to the extent that the logo is cropped. Why ???

Juan calls that centred and I disagree with that comment. The fuselage is centred but not the aircraft. In Juan's thread he uses another of Paul's alnsgside the Air Malta. Yes,there is a lot more sky (as opposed to a lot more grass and concrete) but the image is balanced - the aircraft, not just its fuselage is centred.

Quoting Psych (Reply 9):
But I would go further and say that shots like the following are too high in the frame

Touche - I agree that that one of mine is a bit high

Scbriml - I feel like I am preaching to the converted. Your cropped fin KLM is the sort of thing I do not mind at all - the nosewheel is near the bottom of the frame yet the fin is cropped - a perfectly balanced and good composition. This to me is similar to the cropped wing or tailplane that we all do with a tight crop. However, no one would say that the image below was centred yet turn the composition 90 degrees and many seem to think it is okay - this is effectively what we are looking at with the Air Malta of Colin's. I have simply chosen to chop off one wing rather than choosing to crop off the fin.
Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 700 File size: 444kb
Could anyone possibly consider this centred ?


Quoting Mx330 (Reply 14):
Or just invent the new bad_crop rejection

I am not suggesting a new rejection category, far from it, as the rules are already there, centre and motive. The problem is how they are applied

Mick


User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 16, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2273 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Mick your above picture is an example of what i was asking before.

Quoting JumboJim747 (Reply 1):
How would screeners tackle an issue when a proper crop is not possible.?

I have some great shots that fall into that category but wont upload due to possibility it will get rejected for centre
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1664 posts, RR: 62
Reply 17, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2264 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting JumboJim747 (Reply 1):
How would screeners tackle an issue when a proper crop is not possible.?

Alan
Sorry, I missed that.

Every image is judged on its merits, generally the finished product rather than the difficulty of getting it. A comment to the screener is by no means a guarantee that an image will be accepted but it does often help us come to a decision. If an image is poorly centred (within the rules) but is deliberate or for some other reason, say so and we will take notice. We might not agree, but if we do.....

Mick


User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 18, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2253 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

This continues to be a genuinely interesting photography thread, as the focus is on ideas of composition, not just the normal editing/criteria/rejections. I was really looking forward to catching up on this thread today - that's a situation that has been all too rare recently on the Forum. So, once again, I want to congratulate all on this mature debate.

For me this is as much about motive as centring. I am in agreement with Mick again that a 'motivated' cropping is not what is being critiqued here - it is when a subject is placed particularly in the frame without any apparent positive merit. Thus, I would interpret A.net's criterion as saying that they want the subject to be centrally placed unless the motive of the image demands otherwise. I hate using other people's photos as examples so I will try to find something of my own....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Markman


Technically this is not centred, if you assume the whole formation is the subject - i.e. it is placed over to the right. However, I would argue that - as a photo - this is correctly composed, because the smoke trail, together with the formation shape, suggests a sense of movement from left to right, and thus the composition works - the 'movement' is part of the motive for the image. If I was forced to centre 'in the middle' there would be very little smoke, dead blue sky in front of the formation on the right, and that sense of 'travel' from left to right would be lost. That, to me, would be formulaeic centring. I am glad that this shot was accepted as it is.

So, going back to Juan's post (Reply 14) I see what he is saying about the amount of sky in my shot, but any negative with that is massively outweighed compositionally for me in that the subject - the whole plane - is centred. In my opinion, I cannot see any motive for Colin (sorry Colin for talking about what you were thinking without you being here in the debate - yet) placing his Air Malta plane as he has done, because we now have 'dead' tarmac at the bottom that serves no purpose compositionally, as the whole aircraft is not in frame - i.e. nothing 'makes up for' its presence in the shot. I simply want to pull the aircraft down in the frame to see it all. As I said above - my hunch is that Colin did this as he believed A.net require him to centre the fuselage.

Maybe that is the nub of my issue with all this - if I look at a photo and like what I see it 'works'; if I want to 'get inside the frame' and move the subject then something is not working for me. With aircraft with cropped fins and squeezed in the top of a crop I want to pull them down, just as I would want to pull Mick's PIA example above to the right to make it look okay. But I don't want to pull my Red Arrows formation to the left - it works as it is.

We are back in familiar territory with this thread - 'photography' site vs. 'database'. This debate is all about 'photography'.

Cheers.

Paul


User currently offlineLinco22 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1380 posts, RR: 16
Reply 19, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2253 times:

Morning folks,

Sorry for my late entry to this thread as I've been on holiday for the last few days. Mick discussed this with me and I was more than happy to put my images forward to show his point. I explained that some of my images do look a little uncomfortable with the fin cropped off but I thought it seemed okay to do so.

I still have a few photographs I want to upload and I will consider more carefully how I crop. I do admit that when I took the originals I was trying to show the fuselage and engines as a close crop without emphasis on the fin. I'm glad that Mick has brought up this thread as clarification and discussion is only going to do us all good.

Best Regards
Colin


User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 20, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2231 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Hi guys!

First of all thanks to Mick for starting this thread!
As with the levelling being discussed in this thread: Level Discussion (by ThierryD May 19 2007 in Aviation Photography) centering can be a rather subjective decision.
Colin's shots in comparison with Mick's and Paul's have been thoroughly discussed and I've to agree that the AirMalta to me would look much better with the tail included as (besides the centering) it would include the whole logo and more importantly would add more color in an otherwise rather grey photo. Which leads me to relations; I think that if the tail of a plane only occupies a relatively small portion of the photo and/or is a relatively small part of the airplane it can be cropped out without hurting the balance of the whole photo. That's also why I don't for instance like Mick's Mirage photo above; in my opinion the tail is too big a part and contributes too greatly to the lines of the aircraft to be cropped away like that. For that let's compare it to a similar shot from a master of photo compositions:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mick Bajcar
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sven De Bevere

(@Sven: hope you'll soon find the pleasure to upload to A.net again!)
So another thing to watch out for when centering a photo should be relations.

Another good point that Paul raised is the centering of formation shots; normally I center those by seeing the whole formation as ONE aircraft which normally leads to results as the following:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Thierry Deutsch
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Thierry Deutsch



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Thierry Deutsch
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Thierry Deutsch



but there again, Sven shows us that other very attractive crops are possible:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sven De Bevere
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sven De Bevere



All in all, I don't think we'll come to a perfect consensus here but if people could be motivated to take a little more care of the balance of their photos and less of the A.net formula and if they could be encouraged to try out new and/or less conventional crops the thread will have served its purpose.  

A few more to enjoy and take example from:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sven De Bevere
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sven De Bevere



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sven De Bevere
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sven De Bevere



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andreas Zeitler - Flying-Wings
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andreas Zeitler - Flying-Wings



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andreas Zeitler - Flying-Wings
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Markus Herzig



Cheers,

Thierry

[Edited 2007-05-30 12:06:29]


"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 21, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2194 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 17):
If an image is poorly centred (within the rules) but is deliberate or for some other reason, say so and we will take notice. We might not agree, but if we do.....

Thanks Mick thats good enough for me.

Quoting Psych (Reply 18):
Technically this is not centred, if you assume the whole formation is the subject

Paul is right in that respect same as contrail shots the aircraft is always to on side of the frame to accommodate the trails



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineKMB From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2181 times:

Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 5):
Gerry, there has been discussion amongst the screeners but no real concensus. The purpose of this thread was to seek the opinions of the people uploading. Your opinions are important to us !

It would be interesting to hear the views of other screeners and not just Mick, in the past I have received rejections for the aircraft not being centered in the frame and to avoid inconsistency the screeners need to have similar views.

In trying to get acceptance by one screener, that may bring a rejection from another.

I also believe this could result in too many images looking the same with less photographic creation.

[Edited 2007-05-30 16:47:07]

User currently offlineUA935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Reply 23, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days ago) and read 2150 times:

I personally dislike the images with the fin almost touching the top of the picture and dead space below the gear.

I agree with the inclusion of the fin but the above is purely done to fit with the laid down criteria in that the fuselage of the aricraft should be centered.

It would find it more appealing to have the same distance between the gear and the bottom of the frame and the tail and the top of the frame like pauls Embraer.

Asthetically pleasing crops - no issues here they look great but cropping for the sake of getting a shot on when the original is unusable is wrong.

Mick I think you recently rejected one of mine with a personal comment for cropping the fin, I agree the image looked terrible and I had considered pulling it.

Conversely I had a head on image tightly cropped to almost the bottom of the fin which was rejected, I appealed and it was added.

I like the tight crops and again images can work when cropped halfway up the fin but I feel that there is too much emphasis on having the fuselage centred, as stated above I would rather see an equal distance between the highest point and the top of the image and the lowest and the bottom or a crop which lends itself to an artistic image.

Regards

Simon



Live every second like you mean it
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1664 posts, RR: 62
Reply 24, posted (7 years 2 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2140 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting UA935 (Reply 23):
Mick I think you recently rejected one of mine with a personal comment for cropping the fin, I agree the image looked terrible and I had considered pulling it.

Simon
That does sound like it had my fingerprints on it. I do not think I have rejected any without a personal and I do not recall the other. I actually like tight crops myself and do not mind a cropped fin when there is a good reason for it as with Paul's or Steve's above. The crop of the fin is not the issue, it is when it is gratuitous, unnecessary. That point seems to have been lost - it is not the crop of the fin in itself, it is when that is accompanied by poor centring like the Air Malta at the start of this thread.
Mick


User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5678 posts, RR: 45
Reply 25, posted (7 years 2 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2103 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting UA935 (Reply 23):
Asthetically pleasing crops - no issues here they look great but cropping for the sake of getting a shot on when the original is unusable is wrong.

Absolutely agree, any cropping must be a deliberate part of the composition (and be seen to be by the viewer) rather than clipping a bit because you couldn't get the framing right in the beginning.

Cheers

Chris



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Centring Rejection Feedback posted Tue Dec 5 2006 00:35:20 by Aussie18
Centring Help posted Sat Sep 30 2006 04:43:41 by Aussie18
Photographing Airplanes - Legal Issues posted Wed Aug 30 2006 22:30:28 by NicolasRubio
Lens Issues posted Sun May 21 2006 10:10:08 by 777MechSys
Gate Shots And "motiv" Issues posted Thu May 11 2006 17:55:09 by ZSOFN
Quality Issues With This One? posted Sun Nov 20 2005 22:40:34 by MarkJBeckwith
Clarifying The Quality Issues posted Sun Oct 23 2005 17:02:38 by Psych
Help With Quality Issues posted Sun Oct 16 2005 20:51:00 by WakeTurbulence
Warranty Issues Of UK Citizens Buying From US? posted Fri Oct 7 2005 17:36:07 by Donder10
Quality Issues... posted Wed Sep 28 2005 02:36:48 by TWAMD-80