QantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 22
Reply 1, posted
Wed Jun 13 2007 03:22:23 UTC (8 years 8 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3259 times:
The sky does look a bit grainy, but not so much as to warrant a rejection I think. If you're so inclined, a very light pass of a noise-reducing filter can help. Did you not sharpen selectively?
Also, there's a dust spot just above the nose (and a few more faint ones, I think) on the first shot. And the second photo has some (window?) marks in the lower righthand corner. Easily fixable.
Lanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted
Wed Jun 13 2007 03:50:30 UTC (8 years 8 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3246 times:
Wow! Very nice pics! Congrats!
The blue sky in the first two and the dark areas in the third are a bit too grainy. There´s also the dust spot correctly noticed by Gabriel, and I´m wondering, also, if the first pic might be a little soft.
Good luck with them.
"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
Scottieprecord From UK - England, joined Jul 2004, 1363 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted
Wed Jun 13 2007 04:20:10 UTC (8 years 8 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3233 times:
Yeah, there's noise in all three. And I think the first one might receive a quality rejection... I think if you try to sharpen it anymore, it'll get too many jaggies.
I really like the last two... Fantastic shots!
Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted
Wed Jun 13 2007 05:11:11 UTC (8 years 8 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3222 times:
Exactly what I was thinking. As much as I love the pictures, I think the first one may get the chop.
I'm concerned about the second one too. The quality is a little below par there too. The last, should be fine once as pass of Noise reduction is applied.
Sorry to say that, they are great pics regardless.
PUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4164 posts, RR: 52
Reply 5, posted
Wed Jun 13 2007 06:15:52 UTC (8 years 8 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3211 times:
No 1 and 3 might get the centered rejection also. They are a bit low in the frame for the rules of the site.