Linco22 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1381 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2465 times:
Not bad photographs at all.
The first one seems overexposed on the top of the fuselage, something which is always difficult to achieve judging by the light and the fact that its white! Quality actually looks fine to me, but I also think its a bit low in the frame. If you can correct those issue it should be in with a chance.
The second seems blurry to me, just not quite sharp enough, though ita a nice motive. Also a little low in the frame too.
The last shot could just do with that little extra sharpening.
Lanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2398 times:
First shot is indeed overexposed, as Colin said, but I also see it a bit jagged on the tail (black and red lines), horizontal stabilizers and wingtip flaps. I don´t know where the contrast rejection comes from. Maybe a bit too much contrast? I can´t figure it out. Vertical centering looks fine to me (too much asphalt if not, IMO).
Second shot is a bit blurry and lacks contrast as well. Looks like you´re trying to force the distance issue too much and you lost some quality there. I couldn´t find any dust spots, but with a pass of the equalizing tool you´ll surely see it/them.
Third shot looks pretty OK to me. There are already some jagged areas (registration and left wing), so be careful if you sharpen it more.
Good luck with them. Hope it helps.
"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien