Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted
Sat Jun 23 2007 09:39:24 UTC (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3376 times:
Start smaller. Its way too big. Upload at around 1024 or slightly larger. The Quality will improve a huge amount.
You will need to start with the original and start a new edit. You'll find that with a smaller res, you'll do alot better.
When you sharpen, watch for jaggies that may appear on the horizontal stab.
Carlos From Germany, joined Feb 2006, 235 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted
Sat Jun 23 2007 10:35:35 UTC (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3371 times:
I agree with Eadster, it would be better to start with a smaller size. I prefer 1200 x 800.
The picture is soft. Another problem in my opinion is the contrast. The picture also needs a little bit cw-rotation.
Coninpa From Luxembourg, joined May 2005, 253 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted
Sun Jun 24 2007 09:27:51 UTC (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3320 times:
Thank you all
I'll try a smaller edit.
Patrick De Coninck
Paulinbna From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 1114 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted
Mon Jun 25 2007 01:32:43 UTC (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 3273 times:
Why so big (original post)all my uploads are at 1024 wide you only lose quality the bigger you get.
Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
Walter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1312 posts, RR: 23
Reply 5, posted
Mon Jun 25 2007 10:45:13 UTC (8 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3251 times:
I would rephrase that to: "if there are quality issues, they are less visible at a smaller size..."
Any conversion to JPEG goes together with a loss, which is a factor of the compression ratio selected.
Canon 347d mkII ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l IS USM - ...