Please Help On Quality — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Please Help On Quality

Coninpa From Luxembourg, joined May 2005, 233 posts, RR: 6
Posted (5 years 11 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1487 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi all,

This one has been rejected for quality and soft
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...741-1500-AB-A320-EC-KDD-EHAM-1.jpg

Softness is most probably recoverable, but can you help me find what are the quality problems ?

Thanks
Patrick

Patrick De Coninck

5 replies: All unread, jump to last

Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2214 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (5 years 11 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1468 times:

Quoting Coninpa (Thread starter):
quality problems

Start smaller. Its way too big. Upload at around 1024 or slightly larger. The Quality will improve a huge amount.

You will need to start with the original and start a new edit. You'll find that with a smaller res, you'll do alot better.

When you sharpen, watch for jaggies that may appear on the horizontal stab.

Carlos From Germany, joined Feb 2006, 225 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (5 years 11 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1463 times:

Hi Patrick,

I agree with Eadster, it would be better to start with a smaller size. I prefer 1200 x 800.

The picture is soft. Another problem in my opinion is the contrast. The picture also needs a little bit cw-rotation.

Greetings
Klaus

Coninpa From Luxembourg, joined May 2005, 233 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (5 years 11 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1412 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Thank you all
I'll try a smaller edit.

Patrick

Patrick De Coninck

Paulinbna From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 1114 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (5 years 11 months 20 hours ago) and read 1365 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Why so big (original post)all my uploads are at 1024 wide you only lose quality the bigger you get.

Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro

Walter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1272 posts, RR: 31
Reply 5, posted (5 years 11 months 11 hours ago) and read 1343 times:

Quoting Paulinbna (Reply 4):
you only lose quality the bigger you get.

I would rephrase that to: "if there are quality issues, they are less visible at a smaller size..."
Any conversion to JPEG goes together with a loss, which is a factor of the compression ratio selected.

Best regards,

Walter

canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: