Ptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 4130 posts, RR: 17 Posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1737 times:
This photo was rejected for softness for a second time, though I obviously sharpened it before re-uploading.
The weather was hazy and I can see that quality is not fantastic, but I don't see any softness - do you?
It's an unexciting photo but quite a rare aircraft outside the UK, so I'd like to get it on.
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
DC10Tim From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1406 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1734 times:
The area at the bottom of the nose seems a little soft and also along the bottom of the rear end of the fuselage. It does seem a bit of a harsh rejection though. Especially bearing in mind there are only 6 of this reg. in the DB and the only one outside the UK was taken at LBG 10 years ago.
Lanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1726 times:
I agree with Tim, but I think your picture has more of a blurriness problem rather than a soft issue. I don´t know if you can save it, because more sharpening passes will probably affect the quality in an undesired way.
Good luck with it!
"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien