Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Unusual Photos, But Good Enough?  
User currently offlineOpso1 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 527 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3266 times:

Big version: Width: 1040 Height: 690 File size: 163kb
zd347 takeoff
Big version: Width: 1133 Height: 815 File size: 216kb
C130 air2air
Big version: Width: 1229 Height: 819 File size: 243kb
refuelling
Big version: Width: 1040 Height: 702 File size: 171kb
zd461 break


Please let me know if (any of) these are good enough to be uploaded.

Thanks in advance,

OPSO1

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineB737200 From Malta, joined Feb 2005, 225 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3222 times:

I don't really know whether they will be accepted, as of lately I've been pretty much just getting rejections o I'm not really the right person to say.

I PERSONALLY, really do like the photos, especially the first and second one. Congrats on some great shots.



Lady Guinness is ready to fly...
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 28
Reply 2, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3221 times:

I would not upload the third one.


Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineCalgaryBill From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3205 times:

I quite like the first one, but it seems to have a lot of small JPG compression artifacts (leading edge of flaps, below tail insignia). It would also have a much better chance if you can re-crop it to include the left horizontal stab, then re-save it at 11 or 12 for quality to eliminate the JPG artifacts.

The C-130 has a ton of dust on the image. Was it scanned from slide, or is your sensor dirty? Nice aspect though.

Refueling - interesting, I though you folks always refueled in level flight. Kind of soft and noisy, but a very cool insight into an unusual situation (for me anyway!).

B


User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2081 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3188 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Hi there!

- The Harrier shot is very nice however as Bill said it looks like it suffers from jpeg compression; this might be the result of saving the picture at lesser quality or of some compression taking place when uploading it to your profile. After getting rid of this you're good to go.
- The scanned Herc looks pretty good aswell; just get rid of those dirt spots. You might also wanna check the levelling again as though it might just be the different cloud elevations it looks as if it's slightly leaning to the right.
- The cockpit shot shows an interesting situation however half of the photo is blocked by the righthand seat and it's also pretty dark; don't think it stands a great chance of acceptance here.
- The Harrier shot is somewhat soft; also the huge amount of empty space between the 2 aircraft doesn't really help it but it might just make it.

Good luck!

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offline9A-CRO From Croatia, joined Jun 2000, 1574 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3088 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

i think cockpit shot should be leveled to horizontal,

it looks like refuelling so I guess both planes were flying straight and level then



When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward...
User currently offlineOpso1 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 527 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3032 times:

Quoting 9A-CRO (Reply 5):
it looks like refuelling so I guess both planes were flying straight and level then

If you look at the artificial horizon, we were actually in a 20 degree turn... I know it need a bit of CCW, but I wanted to know if the co-pilot's back took up too much of the shot...

OPSO1


User currently offlineDazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2934 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3030 times:

I love the Harrier shots, the first one might be borderline for uploading here though. The C130 has a blemmish above the tail and needs levelling. I'm not too sure of the quality of that one, its a little grainy but its a terrific shot. The flight deck shot may be rejected for exposure apart from the level issue. Thanks for sharing, most people can only dream of a photo trip like that!

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3010 times:

First one yes.

Second and third, no. Second is good, but quality isn't great. Was it taken through a window? I think the third will go Motive, Dark.

Last, maybe. Not sure on that one.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Not Good Enough, But I Like It! posted Thu Jun 23 2005 07:25:11 by StealthZ
Are These 2 Good Enough? posted Sat Jun 23 2007 19:47:59 by LHRjc
Are These Good Enough? posted Tue Jun 19 2007 15:49:42 by Ilikeflight
Quality Good Enough For A.Net? posted Sun Jun 17 2007 12:28:57 by Carlos
Cockpit Shot Good Enough? posted Tue Jun 5 2007 21:00:03 by GertLOWG
Good Enough? posted Sun Jun 3 2007 11:48:42 by Jai
Good Enough? Opinions Please. posted Tue May 22 2007 03:20:04 by 777DadandJr
These Two Good Enough? posted Wed May 16 2007 18:08:05 by EK20
Good Enough? posted Wed Apr 18 2007 16:47:58 by BaldurSveins
Are These Good Enough To Upload? posted Sat Apr 7 2007 07:58:17 by DL777LAX