Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Motive?  
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1980 posts, RR: 7
Posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1466 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi All,

Had this one rejected for 'motive':
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ctions/big/20070712_ab06153bwa.jpg

Just wanted opinions - did it have no chance at all?

I've seen similar photos accepted lately. On the other hand, I'm partial to my own 'creation', maybe I'm missing something here...

Cheers,
Andrei

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2035 posts, RR: 32
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1457 times:

I don't think there's anything wrong with the composition, although you may have tripped an a.net rule somewhere. I would have a play with the b&w conversion though - see if you can achieve deeper tones and contrast; I'd prefer a darker sky against the shiny fuselage.

James



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3994 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1437 times:

Wow, that's a sweet shot!
Try it in normal colours, like James also said.


User currently offlineIlikeflight From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 366 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1437 times:

I think it was rejected for being B+W


Think Different
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1980 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1422 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting AirKas1 (Reply 2):
Try it in normal colours, like James also said.

I don't think that's what he meant.

Quoting Sulman (Reply 1):
I'd prefer a darker sky against the shiny fuselage.

James, thanks for the hint - it may make the shot look much better.

Quoting Ilikeflight (Reply 3):
I think it was rejected for being B+W

I don't think it is the case - there were some similar BW shots accepted in the DB lately, here are just a few:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Unmuth-AirTeamImages VAP



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alex Williams



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Spencer Wilmot



Unfortunately, there was no message from the screener. I recently complimented the screeners on putting personal messages in the rejection emails. Too bad, it has almost entirely stopped, at least in my case. More rejections, fewer comments...

Cheers,
Andrei


User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3244 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1407 times:

Quoting Ilikeflight (Reply 3):
I think it was rejected for being B+W

Please read reply #1 in this thread:

http://www.airliners.net/discussions...tion_photography/read.main/282049/

I'd say the motiv for having the photo in B&W in this case would be OK. Great shot!  bigthumbsup  Good luck.

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
User currently offlineDiezel From Netherlands, joined Oct 2002, 646 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1400 times:

Hi Andrei,

My first impression of the picture was that there is no real focus point in the picture. It's a bit flat and it just doesn't feel right with the tail so prominent in the foreground. And yes, I know I'm being vague here  Wink sorry about that.

IMHO using B&W should always have a purpose. Beside the airplane being a classic, a very dramatic sky, high contrast or whatever would be nice. I think that is missing here.

And BTW, you are very right about being 'partial' to your own creation. It happens to me all the time and it is exactly what keeps the fun in my hobby!

Roel.



Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1361 times:

I reckon it could be because of the cutting off of the horizontal stab or maybe the rudder?

I don't know but all I think is, its a great shot and deserves to be in the DB.

Then again, its most probably a little too creative for here...


User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1294 posts, RR: 16
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1359 times:

Quoting Eadster (Reply 7):
I reckon it could be because of the cutting off of the horizontal stab or maybe the rudder?

That was my first thought as well. It should have a place in the DB, but I think it should be re-cropped first.
-Matt



Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1980 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1316 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi All, and thanks for the replies.

Tony, thanks for the link. One thing got my attention in the middle and in the end of the thread:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 8):
however they are usually converted incorrectly in Photoshop and are done to hide flaws that would be visible if left in color.



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 10):
Old subjects, converted properly, will get in.

What does it mean - "converted incorrectly"? Probably just using 'desaturate' option? I converted it using 'Power Retouche' plugin, and I played around with it to make it look right. But than, again, if it was for incorrect conversion, it would have been 'editing', not 'motive', wouldn't it?

Quoting Diezel (Reply 6):
My first impression of the picture was that there is no real focus point in the picture. It's a bit flat and it just doesn't feel right with the tail so prominent in the foreground.

I kind of see what you mean, Roel, even though it is arguable... Still, I appreciate your opinion. Maybe I should try and follow James' advice:

Quoting Sulman (Reply 1):
see if you can achieve deeper tones and contrast

About the crop:

Quoting Eadster (Reply 7):
I reckon it could be because of the cutting off of the horizontal stab or maybe the rudder?



Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 8):
I think it should be re-cropped first.

Martin, Matt, I don't really think it is because of the crop - there are tighter crops in the DB. I played with the crop quite a bit, this one seemed the best...

Anyway, it seems a bit like poking in the dark, without any screener's comments...

Here is the same photo in colour, by the way:
http://photofile.ru/photo/chukcha63/1205058/57556119.jpg

Cheers,
Andrei


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9633 posts, RR: 68
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1310 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting Chukcha (Reply 9):
Anyway, it seems a bit like poking in the dark, without any screener's comments...

I sent you an IM 24 hours ago. If you choose to ignore the advice so be it, but don't tell people we are ignoring you.


User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1980 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1301 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Royal, I haven't received anything except the rejection email. And I've never said you are "ignoring" me. I just said it would be nice to have some feedback.

User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1980 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1297 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Royal, sorry, how stupid of me! I've never received an IM before and didn't even know where to look! Honestly, I didn't notice it. Just found it a minute ago. Thanks for your advice!

[Edited 2007-07-13 17:44:53]

User currently offlineChukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1980 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1264 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi All,

After an appeal, the photo has been accepted:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andrei Bezmylov



I wasn't really going to appeal; I don't do it often, mostly I just try to fix and re-upload; my two last appeals had been unsuccessful anyway, and I nearly decided that appealing would be a waste of time. However your support allowed me to build a "case" for an appeal; besides, your posts helped me learn something about my own picture; it is amazing how much you don't see until someone points it out to you...

James, Kas, Ilikeflight, Tony, Roel, Martin, Matt, Royal - thanks everyone!

Cheers,
Andrei


User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1246 times:

Quoting Chukcha (Reply 13):
Martin,

No worries mate, glad to see the screeners came to a great conclusion. Well done all round.


User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3244 posts, RR: 22
Reply 15, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1240 times:

Quoting Chukcha (Reply 13):
Tony,

My pleasure and congratulations! The picture is a great addition to the DB!

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Motive/Centre Advice posted Fri Jul 6 2007 17:05:11 by Ranger703
Motive And Level? posted Wed Jul 4 2007 23:45:41 by Carlos
Bad Motive? posted Wed Jul 4 2007 20:13:08 by Damien846
Wing Shot - Motive Rejection posted Sat Jun 30 2007 21:36:07 by Scottieprecord
Motive? Some Prescreening Help Please posted Wed Jun 27 2007 10:18:08 by Glapira
How Is This Motive? posted Wed Jun 20 2007 22:49:59 by Acontador
Motive And Exposure posted Fri Jun 15 2007 23:03:48 by Kukkudrill
Motive And Size? posted Sun Jun 10 2007 20:41:35 by Damien846
Motive And Quality posted Sun May 27 2007 22:27:14 by Carlos
Motive Clarification posted Sun May 27 2007 10:48:38 by ThierryD