Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
More Motiv Questions  
User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 835 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2795 times:

Is it the incomplete tail surfaces, the rear view, or a combination that makes this Avanti unacceptable?



"Motiv" was a factor in the below three rejections as well. Are they all due to the incomplete pitot booms? On the X-29 and YF-12, would cropping closer to the nose be acceptable?
X-4



X-29



YF-12A


Thanks for your views. (Screener input is especially welcome!)

-Mark


"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNycaviator From United States of America, joined May 2007, 55 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2788 times:

My personal opinion would be the background. The screeners are probably looking for the plane itself. The background might take away a little of the focus. Thats just what I think.


Flying is like having eyes on the top of the world.
User currently offlineIlikeflight From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 366 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 2778 times:

Quoting Nycaviator (Reply 1):
My personal opinion would be the background. The screeners are probably looking for the plane itself. The background might take away a little of the focus. Thats just what I think.

Totally agree there the first shot would be your best bet



Think Different
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3939 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2744 times:

Quoting Vzlet (Thread starter):
Motiv" was a factor in the below three rejections as well. Are they all due to the incomplete pitot booms?

I don't think so. Cutting a long, thin pitot tube is often acceptable for a.net.

On the X-4 ( I had to look that up) the problem is the cutting of the wing and the near cutting of the tailfin I believe. You could have cut more of the tube to avoid these problems. Maybe you have another frame, it's an interesting aircraft and the background is OK I think.

The X-29's boom is rather thick, I think you cut it in the right place. However, the plane is low in the frame which distracts from the subject. Still, I like this picture the best of the four. Again, I don't think the background is too cluttered. Not sure if you can cut the boom more, try how it looks.

The SR-71 is really too low, the upper orange drone at least should not be in the frame. It's also very cluttered (frustrating). I think it's a lost case.

The pitot tube problem is notorious with Sukhoi Fitters and MiGs. Here are some with cut tubes that were accepted:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Jong
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Jong



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Jong
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Jong



This one was rejected, I'm not sure I understand.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ions/big/20070701_Su-20-613ptr.jpg

Peter Smile



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineFly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2732 times:

Quoting Nycaviator (Reply 1):
My personal opinion would be the background. The screeners are probably looking for the plane itself. The background might take away a little of the focus. Thats just what I think.

That is all wrong, background hardly ever warrants a motive rejection.
I would say it's the cut off booms.

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 3):
The pitot tube problem is notorious with Sukhoi Fitters and MiGs. Here are some with cut tubes that were accepted:

Probably just a case of screener preference. Remember, motive is the most subjective rejection.

Ivan



Contrails Aviation Photography
User currently offlineHalcyon From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2716 times:

Quoting Vzlet (Thread starter):

That first one is just beautiful.


User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 835 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2684 times:

Thanks for each of the above replies. They do show, however, a definite contrast of opinions! Views from screeners too would be appreciated.

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 3):
The pitot tube problem is notorious with Sukhoi Fitters and MiGs.

I have about 25 shots in the DB with cropped booms/pitot tubes, mainly on MiGs, Sukhois, and Mi-24s, but I know that screening standards tend to evolve over time and I wondered if it wasn't just a coincidence that they were present in these three museum rejections.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Flight Test/R&D annex is very densely packed. It's frustrating to be amongst so many rare and interesting subjects and not have many clear angles. (I don't have anything wider than a 17-40 on a 1.6x crop body.) That's why I resorted to the hold-the-tripod-above-the-head technique for the two X planes.

I realized that I may not have made it clear that the Avanti shot was also a rejection.

-Mark



"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 835 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2633 times:

I appealed the Avanti shot and it was accepted:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mark Carlisle




"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
MOTIV.....a.net Can Be Even More Popular posted Wed Dec 13 2006 21:00:16 by AKE0404AR
Blocking Stairs - Motiv Reject? posted Fri Jul 13 2007 13:51:00 by Walter2222
And Yet More Help! posted Sun Jul 8 2007 22:11:32 by Damien846
Again More Help Please? posted Sun Jul 8 2007 21:50:53 by Damien846
Advice On More Shots Please. posted Fri Jul 6 2007 21:59:09 by LHRjc
Tail Shot - Motiv Rejection posted Sun Jul 1 2007 00:12:56 by Walter2222
Motiv Rejection posted Wed Jun 20 2007 09:03:26 by Paulinbna
Would This Be Rejected For Motiv? posted Mon Jun 18 2007 06:01:54 by Jetmatt777
More Canon Lens Advice... posted Tue Jun 12 2007 07:40:34 by QantasA332
Seeking Motiv Opinions... posted Mon Jun 11 2007 21:23:14 by Vzlet