Dvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1719 posts, RR: 12 Posted (5 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1369 times:
I've only started working on the image, but it is a fond one of mine. I took it (and others) this weekend at BDL space and aviation day. This post seems pretty self-explanatory, though... yay/nay on the motive? I like the look the wide angle lens and polarizer gives but I can't control things like people or airstairs...
EDIT: re-uploaded the image... for some reason it was deleted? Strange.
Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2214 posts, RR: 16 Reply 1, posted (5 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1349 times:
To me the guy at the rear gear and the other at the front gear are not too much of an issue, but that other guy standing right in the sun, and the bright red stick are problems! The guy with the brown top is just killing the shot.
Dvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1719 posts, RR: 12 Reply 2, posted (5 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1343 times:
Quoting Eadster (Reply 1): To me the guy at the rear gear and the other at the front gear are not too much of an issue, but that other guy standing right in the sun, and the bright red stick are problems! The guy with the brown top is just killing the shot.
I had asked one of the workers if they could move the stick for the shot and they refused... and the fella in brown wouldn't move when I asked him nicely... fraid it was just bad luck.
DM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted (5 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1342 times:
Ilikeflight From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 366 posts, RR: 1 Reply 4, posted (5 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1330 times:
Id say that the guy standing in front of the gear would get the motive boot sorry
DeltaAVL From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1893 posts, RR: 7 Reply 5, posted (5 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1319 times:
Eh, I sorta like it, and it probably would have gotten through screening had it not had the flaws as mentioned above, but a different angle would have been better, IMHO.
Also, it'd get rejected for exposure. Your whites are blown out.
"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
Dvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1719 posts, RR: 12 Reply 6, posted (5 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1274 times:
Quoting DeltaAVL (Reply 5):
Also, it'd get rejected for exposure. Your whites are blown out.
No, they are not. Use an eyedropper on the whites on the fuselage. They are within 230-240. The highlight edges on the wings may be 255, but that's to be expected.
It's clear that what I thought is correct and the guy is a problem. I have different angles without him in it so I will try those instead. Thanks for the comments.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1719 posts, 
From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2214 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
