Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A Challenging Level!  
User currently onlineAlibo5NGN From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 773 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1617 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

My proficiency in levelling shots has improved over the past year. Every now and then a difficult and very subjective level situation appears. The shot below was rejected for level. I thought it felt right after I levelled it, and the PS grid lines aligned with the vertical lines on the walls of the multi layered/storied hanger at the center of the shot. The horizon cannot be judged from the tree line as evidenced by the C-130 which is in a lower area. The angle of the SNJ-2 Texan has not helped matters. McGuire Air Force base appears flat but is actually undulating with small rises and shallow depressions.The only reasonably flat areas are the runways. Your help as to the best way to level this shot will be appreciated.


http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...orthAmericanSNJ-2TexanFrontWRI.jpg


Thanks

Ken.


It takes knowledge to make a career. It takes wisdom to live a life.
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1611 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Needs cw rotation

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12474 posts, RR: 46
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1596 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

0.24CW rotation makes it look much better!

I like the shot. Not in any way a criticism, but a slightly slower shutter speed would have resulted in a very nice prop "disk". It's worth trying the next time you get a similar chance.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently onlineAlibo5NGN From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 773 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1580 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thank you Tim and Steve for your prompt response and advice. I have done a complete re edit as I cannot do a CW on an already edited shot without losing quality. I would appreciate it if you guys would re evaluate this new edit.

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 683 File size: 576kb
Copyright Kenneth C. Iwelumo


Thanks once more.

Ken.



It takes knowledge to make a career. It takes wisdom to live a life.
User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 1569 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello Ken.

I have to acknowledge that I have always found the levelling issue fascinating. Yours is another excellent example.

I would agree that your first shot does look in need of a little CW rotation. For me there are a few verticals in shot that give the impression of leaning very slightly to the left. I am thinking particularly about the right edge of that smaller building that is cropped on the left (though the verticals it has on its surface do look level - a conflict there for you) and the edge of the building in the middle. The fact that the horizontal of the smaller building roof on the middle/right also slopes from right to left only 'confirms' the impression in the brain that the whole picture is sloping.

In the second edit I think you have corrected one of the key points - that edge of the building on the left. But now one of those vertical lines on its surface, right by the edge of the crop, looks to lean to the right. This might trick your brain into thinking the photo needs CCW rotation now, if you are not careful  crazy . But the building edge itself looks right to me, and the main vertical in mid photo also does not have any sense of leaning either. So I would be more hopeful on that.

One trick I use is to grab the top of the toolbox in PS to move it around the image and use its edge to put up against verticals in the photo. If you do that with the above vertical references, it looks to be spot on now.

But those vertical lines on that building on the left are not vertical, so that is misleading (it is they that look spot on in your first image). Maybe worth a note to the screeners.

All the best.

Paul


User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12474 posts, RR: 46
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1541 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Psych (Reply 4):
Maybe worth a note to the screeners.

This is an excellent point. Sometimes, whatever was used to measure level is subsequently cropped out of the image. In cases like that, I always leave a note for the screener. I'll also mention, especially if a shot "looks unlevel", what was used to measure level (e.g. edge of building in background).

I suspect that some screeners only ever go by the visual look of a shot. I've had level rejections where a building in the background is clearly (and measurably) perfectly vertical.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlineIlikeflight From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 366 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1536 times:

Yep needs CW rotation


Think Different
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Motive And Level? posted Wed Jul 4 2007 23:45:41 by Carlos
Level Rejection posted Sat Jun 30 2007 00:00:12 by Pride
Level Rejection posted Sun Jun 24 2007 19:53:34 by Opso1
Help To Level A Shot posted Thu Jun 7 2007 15:07:49 by Jajo
Is This Level? posted Sun Jun 3 2007 21:51:55 by Yanqui67
Need Level Advice posted Fri Jun 1 2007 23:29:50 by Unattendedbag
Automatic Level Rejection? posted Sun May 27 2007 14:39:52 by Ptrjong
Now I'm Sure It's Level But....................... posted Sat May 26 2007 08:10:06 by Damien846
Level Discussion posted Sat May 19 2007 16:26:41 by ThierryD
Pls Help With Level posted Sat May 19 2007 14:22:01 by FYODOR