Sulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2041 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (8 years 10 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3270 times:
Quoting Aero145 (Reply 1): I'd say it suffers from blurriness so my advise is... remove it from the queue.
It's not as clear cut for these kinds of shots. If you look at many of them, most will have some loss of definition around the edges - it's just one of those things you've got to live with shooting at the long end of your glass, with a target moving at around 800km/h - it's not easy to get good results!
I'd say leave it in and see how it goes.
It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
And I have a shot pretty much identical to yours, in which you could see afterburner exhaust. I took it just a few moments before the one that I uploaded. Sunday was a good day there.
Thanks for your comments guys!
Singel09 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 155 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 10 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3208 times:
Keep it on. Nice shot, nice vapour, action, speed, it has it all. Who cares that it is not super sharp? This is an action photo, a good one, not one of this million boaring shots of a taxiiing aircraft, or landing, full side view, like a documentary picture, makes me yawn. This one makes me go "YES !! " Keep it in, please