Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How To Improve The Quality?  
User currently offlineAvro85 From Belgium, joined Jun 2005, 236 posts, RR: 2
Posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3779 times:

Hello all,

I have the following picture of a US 767-200 in the queue. Is the quality acceptable or how can I improve the shot ?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/N245AY_02.jpg

Many thanks for your feedback.

Chris

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9603 posts, RR: 69
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3777 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Not bad, might be a tad dark (due to the high sun). I would HQ it.

User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3771 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 1):
Not bad, might be a tad dark (due to the high sun). I would HQ it.

Hmmm.... Maybe its me but i can see quality and oversharpened issues?


User currently offlineJajo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3771 times:

Cool photo, but I think it looks oversharpened/jagged and possibly heat haze all over the plane! I would never expect this to be accepted, but if Clickhappy would HQ it, go for it.

/ Jacob


User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3771 times:

Quoting Jajo (Reply 3):
but if Clickhappy would HQ it, go for it.

Thats what i was thinking.


User currently offlineAvro85 From Belgium, joined Jun 2005, 236 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3763 times:

Thanks for the quick feedback guys !! I prefer Clickhappy's answer  Wink however I'll try to rework the shot as to erase the issues. Eventhough I can't really spot the oversharpened spots..

On a side note: Would a shot such as this one be accepted or rejected for obstruction ? (I don't talk about quality and other issues - just made a quick edit) http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/HB-IQH.jpg

And how abou the quality of this shot ? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/HB-IQH_01.jpg

Thanks again for all your feedback.

Greetings from Belgium

Chris


User currently offlineBoeingfreak From Germany, joined May 2005, 398 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3757 times:

US 767 is blurry and oversharpened.

Quoting Avro85 (Reply 5):
On a side note: Would a shot such as this one be accepted or rejected for obstruction ? (I don't talk about quality and other issues - just made a quick edit) http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...H.jpg

No, don't think so.

Quoting Avro85 (Reply 5):
And how abou the quality of this shot ? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...1.jpg

Blurry and oversharpened, there is a dustspot above the front door.
Sorry.

Florian


User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3750 times:

Quoting Avro85 (Reply 5):
Would a shot such as this one be accepted or rejected for obstruction ?

I think that the first one would. The "10-28" runway sign is very distracting to me.

BTW: I just realised that i am on a different monitor! Kinda forgot somehome but how, I'm 9000 miles from home! Anyway, thats probably the reason why i saw oversharpened areas, sorry.

[Edited 2007-08-02 22:10:31]

User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3702 times:

Hi Chris

Quoting Boeingfreak (Reply 6):
US 767 is blurry and oversharpened.

 checkmark 

Quoting Avro85 (Reply 5):
Would a shot such as this one be accepted or rejected for obstruction ?

It´s borderline, but I don´t think it can make it. There are other issues as well.

Quoting Avro85 (Reply 5):
And how abou the quality of this shot ?

In my opinion it´s heat-hazy, blurry and a bit oversharpened in some places. The blown out white areas are too intense, I´m afraid. They might kill its chances.

Hope it helps. Big grin

Cheers  Smile
Lanas.-



"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offlineAirMalta From Malta, joined Mar 2006, 394 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3649 times:

nice photo mate..
malc


User currently offlineAvro85 From Belgium, joined Jun 2005, 236 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3612 times:

Thanks all for your comments !! I've pulled the two Swiss A330's from the queue.

Would someone be so kindly and point me the spots which are oversharpened/blurry/jagged etc.. on the US Airways shot ? I would like to save it !!

Thanks  Smile

Chris


User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2237 posts, RR: 49
Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3603 times:

Quoting Avro85 (Reply 10):
Would someone be so kindly and point me the spots which are oversharpened/blurry/jagged etc.. on the US Airways shot ? I would like to save it !!

The whole thing is oversharpened. Where the red line and blue belly meet the white parts, the leading edge of the tail, the main wheels, the stylised US flag on the tail, the cockpitwindows, the top of the fuselage... Does the original suffer from heat haze?
Perhaps you can post a full sized image, I can have a go at editing for you...
Ed


User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2237 posts, RR: 49
Reply 12, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3567 times:

Here's my edit... Nice picture! ...and no heathaze thank god!
Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 683 File size: 451kb
Chris' US767


Cheers,
Ed


User currently offlineAvro85 From Belgium, joined Jun 2005, 236 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3557 times:

Thanks for your very precious help Ed  Smile !! Your edit looks fantastic compared to mine. I now clearly see the the difference between editing techniques. I will definitely try to improve my editing skills !!

Greetz
Chris


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...