Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Another Motive Question...........................  
User currently offlineDamien846 From UK - England, joined Dec 2006, 661 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3114 times:

Hello again,

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 683 File size: 772kb

Just rough edit, but what about the motive.
Cheers
Damien

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 4008 posts, RR: 55
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3081 times:

I like it. I'd give it a try.

User currently offlineDiezel From Netherlands, joined Oct 2002, 646 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3073 times:

Very nice motive! But you need to correct the bad case of chromatic aberration best visible along the trailing edge of the tail. It's very visible and I don't think it will get through the screening process as it is.

Roel.



Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1195 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3057 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Damien

The motive of this shot is okay.

_Hongyin_


User currently offlineFly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3043 times:

I would crop it at 4:3 to give it some space on top and bottom.

Ivan


User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3959 posts, RR: 18
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3035 times:

Quoting Fly747 (Reply 4):
I would crop it at 4:3 to give it some space on top and bottom.

Good idea, but mostly on top and just a little at the bottom I'd say.

Peter Smile



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineScotland1979 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 548 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3009 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

It is motive shot! It would be shame to learn that it is not motive. I have my photos were rejected due to not motive and the same photos on other websites that someone bought them (how can they are not motive) I think "no motive or motive" should not be an issue on this website.


Jesus said "I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me" - John 14:6
User currently offlineUnattendedbag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2328 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2997 times:

what about the quality issues?


Slower traffic, keep right
User currently offlineFly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2984 times:

Quoting Unattendedbag (Reply 7):
what about the quality issues?



Quoting Damien846 (Thread starter):
Just rough edit, but what about the motive.

Ivan


User currently offlineDamien846 From UK - England, joined Dec 2006, 661 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2961 times:

Quoting Bubbles (Reply 3):
The motive of this shot is okay.

Thanks Hongyin,
Does it need much more editing?
Cheers
Damien


User currently offlineDamien846 From UK - England, joined Dec 2006, 661 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2949 times:

Quoting Diezel (Reply 2):
But you need to correct the bad case of chromatic aberration best visible along the trailing edge of the tail. It's very visible and I don't think it will get through the screening process as it is.

Whats the best way to fix this?
regards
Damien


User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1195 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2909 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting Damien846 (Reply 9):
Does it need much more editing?

Hi Damien

This edition looks slightly blurry and oversharpened. I also see some purple fringes (chromatic aberration). So I would suggest doing another editing to it with carefully using selective sharpening in order to avoid jaggies.

_Hongyin_


User currently offlineDiezel From Netherlands, joined Oct 2002, 646 posts, RR: 11
Reply 12, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2873 times:

Quoting Damien846 (Reply 10):
Whats the best way to fix this?

The fringing is caused by your lens. It happens usually with average quality lenses in high contrast situations or with high quality lenses with teleconverters attached.

I know that Photoshop CS2 has a filter in the menu filter->Distort->lens correction which is quite able to correct the CA for you.

Roel.



Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
User currently offlineAMSA From Portugal, joined Apr 2006, 39 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 2854 times:

Hi Damien

I'd do what Bubbles wrote - do some selective sharpening - and use the filter in PS in order to correct the CA (Chromatic Aberration), just like Roel wrote too!

Btw, the CA gets higher when we use high aperture (f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6) (combined with high zoom it gets even more higher!).
Of course this doesn't happen with high quality lenses  Wink

Regards,
Allen A.



Best regards from LIS, Allen Azevedo
User currently offlineDamien846 From UK - England, joined Dec 2006, 661 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2831 times:

Thanks Guys,
Will have a go at it latter.
Cheers
Damien


User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 42
Reply 15, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2817 times:

Quoting AMSA (Reply 13):
Of course this doesn't happen with high quality lenses

So the Canon 24-105/4 IS L isn't a high quality lens ?
Nice to get some conformation for something I am telling you for a long time Big grin



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineAMSA From Portugal, joined Apr 2006, 39 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2792 times:

Aviopic,
Well, that's a highQ lens because of the glass (L) yes  Smile

I didn't make myself clear.
What I wanted to say is that, generally, highQ tele-zoom lens (L) have lower CA, while the highQ wide-zoom have higher CA, regardless if they are L glass  Yeah sure  Wink



Best regards from LIS, Allen Azevedo
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Another Motive Question... posted Tue Feb 21 2006 01:27:03 by CanadianNorth
Another Motive Question........................... posted Sun Aug 5 2007 07:11:11 by Damien846
Motive Question? posted Mon May 14 2007 19:32:35 by Jid
Motive-question, Closeup posted Sun Apr 15 2007 10:30:55 by Jajo
Motive Question posted Wed Mar 28 2007 20:40:50 by Jajo
Yet Another Rejection Question Thread! posted Sun Jan 7 2007 19:29:52 by N440ER
Motive Question... posted Wed Dec 6 2006 23:55:16 by Eadster
Another Motive Rejection Help Request. posted Tue Sep 12 2006 02:38:53 by Paparadzi
Another Category Question/rejection posted Sun Aug 27 2006 17:11:58 by DYflyer
Motive Question - Ramp Shot posted Fri Jun 2 2006 09:32:00 by ZSOFN