Diezel From Netherlands, joined Oct 2002, 646 posts, RR: 12 Reply 2, posted (5 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2034 times:
Very nice motive! But you need to correct the bad case of chromatic aberration best visible along the trailing edge of the tail. It's very visible and I don't think it will get through the screening process as it is.
Scotland1979 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 546 posts, RR: 13 Reply 6, posted (5 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1970 times:
It is motive shot! It would be shame to learn that it is not motive. I have my photos were rejected due to not motive and the same photos on other websites that someone bought them (how can they are not motive) I think "no motive or motive" should not be an issue on this website.
Jesus said "I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me" - John 14:6
Unattendedbag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2241 posts, RR: 1 Reply 7, posted (5 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1958 times:
Damien846 From UK - England, joined Dec 2006, 657 posts, RR: 0 Reply 10, posted (5 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1910 times:
Quoting Diezel (Reply 2): But you need to correct the bad case of chromatic aberration best visible along the trailing edge of the tail. It's very visible and I don't think it will get through the screening process as it is.
This edition looks slightly blurry and oversharpened. I also see some purple fringes (chromatic aberration). So I would suggest doing another editing to it with carefully using selective sharpening in order to avoid jaggies.
The fringing is caused by your lens. It happens usually with average quality lenses in high contrast situations or with high quality lenses with teleconverters attached.
I know that Photoshop CS2 has a filter in the menu filter->Distort->lens correction which is quite able to correct the CA for you.
AMSA From Portugal, joined Apr 2006, 39 posts, RR: 0 Reply 13, posted (5 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1815 times:
Hi Damien
I'd do what Bubbles wrote - do some selective sharpening - and use the filter in PS in order to correct the CA (Chromatic Aberration), just like Roel wrote too!
Btw, the CA gets higher when we use high aperture (f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6) (combined with high zoom it gets even more higher!).
Of course this doesn't happen with high quality lenses
AMSA From Portugal, joined Apr 2006, 39 posts, RR: 0 Reply 16, posted (5 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1753 times:
Aviopic,
Well, that's a highQ lens because of the glass (L) yes
I didn't make myself clear.
What I wanted to say is that, generally, highQ tele-zoom lens (L) have lower CA, while the highQ wide-zoom have higher CA, regardless if they are L glass
Sponsor Message: 
From UK - England, joined Dec 2006, 657 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3853 posts, 
From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1193 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 546 posts, 
From Portugal, joined Apr 2006, 39 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
