Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Need Help To Get It Right  
User currently offline747ata32 From Netherlands, joined Oct 2006, 44 posts, RR: 1
Posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3899 times:

From time to time I upload a photo to Airliners.net. In the past I managed a couple of times to get past the screeners and get the photo posted. My last photo posted is already a while back (2003) and I guess the minimum required quality has been raised substantialy since then, given that in the last year every photo I upload has been rejected.

I am the proud owner of a Nikon D80 with a Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4.5 DC MACRO and a Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G AF-S VR. As far as equipment goes, I bellieve that this set should be able to produce pictures that withstand the highly critical (too critical sometimes?????(not meaning to bash)) and all seeing eyes of the screeners.

Convinced that I finally got a winner, last week I uploaded this photo

Big version: Width: 1600 Height: 1082 File size: 267kb


In CS3, I brought up the levels a bit, used the "Smart Sharpen" function and resized to a width of 1600pix.

This morning I recieved the rejection-mail as I've seen dozens of times.
Eventhough the mail kindly states that "....everyone has their photos rejected from time to time....", it is getting a bit frustrating by now, because I no longer know what to do to get it right.

The picture was rejected because of "Blemishes" and "Too much grain or digital noise".
I really don't see it!  eyepopping 
So I would much appreciate it if you people could explain to me what's wrong with this photo and how I can improve it in the future.

Just to be clear, this post is in no way meant to question or critisize the A.net screeners, I just want to learn and become a part of the frequent uploading A.net photographers.

Greetz,

Frank


Flown: 733, 734, 73G, 738, 739, 742, 743, 744, M11, 752, 763, F100, F70, SF340, A319, A320, A321, A332, 772, 77W, D10, D
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3890 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Hi Frank!

The screeners were still quite nice (or lazy  Wink) when rejecting only for dirt and grain; in fact the following reason would apply too: center, contrast or simply a quality rejection.
First of all you need to downsize your pictures to about 1040x700; this will make the picture look much better in quality.
You can find the exact required sizes here:
http://planecatcher.com/IGRR/Size.htm
along with other useful uploading hints.

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offline747ata32 From Netherlands, joined Oct 2006, 44 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3887 times:

Hello Thierry,

Thanks for this quick response. Please elaborate a bit.

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 1):
center

What's wrong with the center? This was no crop. I shot the photo as is. If you mean the aircraft is too high in the picture, in total perspective of the picture, I thought it quite nicely fits the composition.

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 1):
contrast

Do you mean to high or to low?

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 1):
simply a quality rejection

Now you lost me. Please explain.

Best regards,

Frank



Flown: 733, 734, 73G, 738, 739, 742, 743, 744, M11, 752, 763, F100, F70, SF340, A319, A320, A321, A332, 772, 77W, D10, D
User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3887 times:

First of all, your shot should also get rejected for blurry, centered and level. As for your equipment, its fine. I also have a D80.

For uploading, i would never do 1600 pix wide, more like 1200 (what i always do) or 1024. That way the screeners will see less quality issues. What modes were you shooting when you took the shot? ISO, camera settings, etc.... because it does have lots of noise in it. Also, next time centering the shot before taking it can probably save you from a centering rejection.

DM


User currently offline747ata32 From Netherlands, joined Oct 2006, 44 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3883 times:

Quoting DM (Reply 3):
blurry

 confused  which part  confused 
The aircraft looks perfectly clear and sharp to me.
Not to discuss your opinion, just trying to understand.

Quoting DM (Reply 3):
ISO, camera settings

Shot this photo at ISO100 in the S(hutterspeed) mode. Shutterspeed is (IIRC) 1/250th and the aperture was around f/5.
Have to check the original EXIF data for that to be exact.

Frank



Flown: 733, 734, 73G, 738, 739, 742, 743, 744, M11, 752, 763, F100, F70, SF340, A319, A320, A321, A332, 772, 77W, D10, D
User currently onlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3882 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting 747ata32 (Reply 2):
What's wrong with the center? This was no crop. I shot the photo as is. If you mean the aircraft is too high in the picture, in total perspective of the picture, I thought it quite nicely fits the composition.

It's far too high in the frame for A.net standards; aim to get the middle of the fuselage into the middle of the frame.

Quoting 747ata32 (Reply 2):
contrast

Do you mean to high or to low?

Too much contrast. (further explained here: http://planecatcher.com/IGRR/Contrast.htm)

Quoting 747ata32 (Reply 2):
simply a quality rejection

Now you lost me. Please explain.

When several factors come together, like in your picture (dirt, contrast, grain) screeners sometimes just give a quality rejection to tell you that the overall quality doesn't meet A.net standards. Up to you to find out then what exactly is wrong.

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3882 times:

Quoting 747ata32 (Reply 2):
Do you mean to high or to low?

Too high, look at the bottom of the fuselage and you can see the darker areas that have been hit with too much contrast.

Quoting 747ata32 (Reply 2):
Now you lost me. Please explain.

Noise, grain, blemishes, dirt, blurriness, all fall under "quality"

Quoting 747ata32 (Reply 4):
which part

Slightly in the nose area.

Now that i think of this it should have recived a editing rejection too! You have cloned out a dustspot (i think) near the right wingtip that has actually casued it to clone the wingtip also making it look like there are two wingtips!

DM

[Edited 2007-08-10 11:49:05]

User currently offline747ata32 From Netherlands, joined Oct 2006, 44 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3872 times:

Quoting DM (Reply 6):
Now that i think of this it should have recived a editing rejection too! You have cloned out a dustspot (i think) near the right wingtip that has actually casued it to clone the wingtip also making it look like there are two wingtips!

Nope. Did not clone out anything on the photo. What you see above the righthand wing tip is the tip of the righthand horizontal stabilizer.

Quoting DM (Reply 6):
Slightly in the nose area.

So is there a way to select only that part in PS and sharpen it a bit???

On a general note, thanks so far for all the time you guys take in explaining to me. Slowely, things start to dawn on me.... a bit....

Frank



Flown: 733, 734, 73G, 738, 739, 742, 743, 744, M11, 752, 763, F100, F70, SF340, A319, A320, A321, A332, 772, 77W, D10, D
User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3866 times:

Quoting 747ata32 (Reply 7):
Nope. Did not clone out anything on the photo. What you see above the righthand wing tip is the tip of the righthand horizontal stabilizer.

Whoa, that was kinda an illusion to me! Sorry!

Quoting 747ata32 (Reply 7):
So is there a way to select only that part in PS and sharpen it a bit???

Yup, If you click on the selective blur tool (looks like a drop of water) you can switch it over to a selective sharpen tool (triangular shaped) which you can then sharpen what you would like.

DM


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Need Help Getting The Basics Right! posted Wed Jun 27 2007 16:50:02 by LHRjc
Need Help To Identify Aircraft And Help With Photo posted Sat Sep 9 2006 18:57:51 by Sfilipowicz
Help To Get A Publishable Image posted Wed Jul 27 2005 18:27:29 by ManuCH
Two Times Rejected For Badangle. Need Help To Fix. posted Thu Jun 30 2005 08:18:42 by AKau
Need Help To Identify C-GLXF posted Tue Jan 11 2005 00:35:12 by Ghsweusa
Need Help To Fix A Nightshot Rejection posted Mon Mar 22 2004 17:43:14 by Patroni
Need Help To Find A Discontinued Lens posted Tue Dec 10 2002 13:34:18 by Lewis
Ok, I Just Don't Get This Rejection Need Help. posted Mon May 21 2007 20:47:09 by Silver1SWA
I Finally Got A Chance To See This Bird Need Help! posted Tue Feb 13 2007 12:04:38 by Silver1SWA
Help Me To Improve It Pls! posted Sat Jan 27 2007 16:28:31 by AirMalta