Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Messerschmitt Photo  
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3944 posts, RR: 18
Posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2847 times:

Hi all,

A simple question, does the glare in the cockpit canopy kill this Bf 109 for a.net? (It has been killed before Big grin )
http://www.horizonten.nl/pix/Bf109.jpg
I know a prop blade is blocked, but I think could get away with that.

Altenatively I have a close-up:
http://www.horizonten.nl/pix/Bf109-1.jpg

Both shots are unedited.

Thanks for your opinions as always,

Peter Smile


The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2035 posts, RR: 32
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2775 times:

Hi Peter,

Very interesting photos. Any chance you can stand on that table near the nose and get a wide-angle shot? What's the story with the aircraft? I'm assuming that it's a full restoration, is the intent that it flies again?


James



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3944 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2753 times:

Hi James.

Quoting Sulman (Reply 1):
Any chance you can stand on that table near the nose and get a wide-angle shot?

Not a bad idea, but I had little time left unfortunatley, and I'm not going back there soon.

Quoting Sulman (Reply 1):
What's the story with the aircraft?

It's under reconstruction in a small museum at Seppe airfield (EHSE) between Roosendaal and Breda, Netherlands.

It's said to be the world's only surviving Bf 109G-5 version, c/n 15343, built mid-1943 at Erla in Leipzig, 'Black 11', of 5. Staffel, II, Gruppe, JG 3 'Udet', based at Amsterdam - Schiphol and shot down by 487 FS P-47s on 4 Dec 1943 over South Holland province. The pilot, Kurt Sorssdorf, bailed out and was taken care of at a local farmhouse. The farmer's son was doing forced labour in Germany, and Sorssdorf later had an food package delivered to him.
The aircraft was written off; the tail was cut off and thrown in the crater dug by the aircraft, which was then filled up.

I don't think this reconstruction is to airworthy standards...

Here's another photo for you.
http://www.horizonten.nl/pix/Bf109-2.jpg

Does no one have an idea about the acceptability of the first shot?

Peter Smile



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1299 posts, RR: 28
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2733 times:

Wow, Peter!
Interesting story! Make sure to add that story in the comments field!

I would certainly give it a try, with some editing (which you said you had not done yet), you can certainly reduce the glare a bit. I would certainly love to see it in the database, but I am not a screener... and I cannot judge anyway on the quality since my editing monitor is in repair...

PS: I assume you had no possibility to drag it outside for a better shot?  Smile

Best regards and good luck with the edit!

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2035 posts, RR: 32
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2725 times:

It's in bloody good nick considering it bumped into the ground at sufficient speed to make a hole in it..I guess they've been working on it for a long time already!

If you can reduce the glare give it a go - it's certainly pretty interesting!


James



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3944 posts, RR: 18
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2678 times:

Alright, this is my attempt:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/Bf109-11-1ptr.jpg
Thanks for your feedback.

Quoting Sulman (Reply 4):
It's in bloody good nick considering it bumped into the ground at sufficient speed to make a hole in it..

We're essentially living in a swamp here Smile But I understand many structural parts are new, and bits from other Bf 109s are also involved.

Peter Smile



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3944 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2564 times:

It was allowed in, thanks all

Peter Smile

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Jong




The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 7, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2521 times:

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 6):
It was allowed in,

All I can say is 'wow'...I didn't think it had a chance.


User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1668 posts, RR: 62
Reply 8, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2512 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting JeffM (Reply 7):
All I can say is 'wow'...I didn't think it had a chance.

Jeff
Based solely on quality, you would have been right in thinking that, mainly due to the flare around the cockpit However judgement calls have to be made based on the rarity of the subject and this one was a stunning subject and the first time to my knowledge that a photo of it has been seen.
A beautiful aircraft and a good story too - it had to be added didn't it ?

Mick Bajcar


User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1299 posts, RR: 28
Reply 9, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2481 times:

Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 8):
A beautiful aircraft and a good story too - it had to be added didn't it ?

 checkmark 

... and now I would like to see the real thing as well!

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3944 posts, RR: 18
Reply 10, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2472 times:

Quoting JeffM (Reply 7):
All I can say is 'wow'...I didn't think it had a chance.

Fair enough, Jeff - it is flawed. But for a first picture of an aircraft sitting in a dark hole it's apparently acceptable.

Quoting Walter2222 (Reply 9):
... and now I would like to see the real thing as well!

http://www.luchtvaartmuseum.nl/bezoek.php?page=tijden.php&loc=1

So, Walter, let you be the one to shoot a good picture of it. Take your tripod, take your time to talk the clutter out of the way and take care with your flash if you use it at all.

I'll be back there near the Walterland border myself later

Peter Smile



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1299 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2462 times:

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 10):
I'll be back there near the Walterland border myself later

 Smile  Smile

Thanks for the link, Peter! I was not even aware that there was an airstrip/museum in that area...  ashamed  ... and I pass Breda almost everyday when I drive to work...

I will certainly pay a visit there, someday!

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 10):
So, Walter, let you be the one to shoot a good picture of it



I am not the best person to do that...I normally shoot soft/blurry/dark/motive pictures  Smile

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3247 posts, RR: 22
Reply 12, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2458 times:

Quoting Walter2222 (Reply 11):
soft/blurry/dark/motive

Nonesense!!! But dark will be the name of the game in this case, wouldn't it?  Wink

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1299 posts, RR: 28
Reply 13, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2427 times:

Quoting SNATH (Reply 12):
Nonesense!!!

No, it is true! But the screeners do a great job with selecting the few that are worth to be shown  Smile

Greetings from Belgium,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Reducing Photo Noise? posted Fri Aug 10 2007 08:04:02 by Kaitak744
Copa Ailrines Photo posted Thu Aug 9 2007 19:30:10 by Mike89406
Thread Starters Cutting Photo Links In Threads posted Mon Aug 6 2007 16:46:57 by DeltaAVL
It's That Time Again, Photo Sale Help Needed posted Fri Jul 27 2007 09:28:11 by AirKas1
Gsfa Consulting - Photo Sales For Print Brochure. posted Thu Jul 26 2007 18:34:50 by Scottieprecord
What's With This Photo? posted Wed Jul 25 2007 14:47:20 by TRINIFELLAH
Question About Uploading A Photo posted Wed Jul 18 2007 05:55:55 by DeltaAVL
Landing Gear Detail? (Photo Advice) posted Sat Jul 14 2007 08:01:46 by Whappeh
Photo Compile? posted Fri Jul 13 2007 10:57:19 by Neopolian
F27 Photo On My G7 - Good Enough posted Fri Jul 6 2007 21:37:14 by Thowman