Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Strange Issue With Nikkor 18-200mm VR  
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4038 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Hi guys!

Since the Nikkor customer service was of no great help I'm addressing this issue to you in the hope that maybe someone experienced a similar issue.
My AF-S VR DX Nikkor 18-200mm since a few days now has some trouble focusing in the long zoom range, namely from about 100mm on. That means that it won't focus in the zoom range from about 100mm-200mm. Everything is perfectly fine in the lower zoom ranges from 18-100m.
To make things even more awkward, it does focus perfectly well in the mentionned zoom range from the 100-200mm if the subject it's aiming for is pretty close (like 1m-20m away); however if the aimed at subject is further away the lens just won't focus anymore; it tries but without any success.
This is the case both in automatic and in manual mode.

I hope I could make this strange issue clear to you and am looking forward to hearing your feedback about it before I go to the Nikon repair shop here in Austria who won't accept the US warranty of my lens.  Sad

Cheers,

Thierry


"Go ahead...make my day"
23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVice911 From China, joined Nov 2006, 57 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4027 times:

hi, it does sound doggy, i would definetly sent it to nikon to check it out.
Ciao
Yuan Le



Back in China now. Camera used: Nikon D70 D50 D200 D40 FUJI S3 PRO Canon 400D. Now with Nikon D7000.
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9603 posts, RR: 69
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4014 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

It won't even focus in manual mode?

User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4000 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 2):
It won't even focus in manual mode?

Nope, I can turn the focus-ring (is that how it's called???) into the infinity range as long as I want but it won't focus but as said only in the zoom range from 100-200mm and only if the aimed subject is further away.

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9603 posts, RR: 69
Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3994 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

in manual mode does the viewfinder looked focus when you move the focus ring?

User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 42
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3968 times:

Quoting ThierryD (Thread starter):
before I go to the Nikon repair shop here in Austria who won't accept the US warranty of my lens.

You have to check EU law Thierry, I think they have to.



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3955 times:

I used to have a similar problem with my 18-135 where it wouldn't even focus at all! The only way i could get it to AF properly was to focus it with the focusing ring in MF and then switch over to AF and take the shot once i had focused it properly in MF.

I sent the lense in for repair and they replaced a few wires that had to do with the AF system. I think this should solve your problem also.

Good luck

DM


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3910 times:

Quoting DM (Reply 6):
The only way i could get it to AF properly was to focus it with the focusing ring in MF and then switch over to AF and take the shot once i had focused it properly in MF.

Could just be me....but that makes no sense at all. You either have the camera focus (Auto) or you do it (Manual). Manually focusing isn't proper auto focus.

Quoting DM (Reply 6):
I sent the lense in for repair and they replaced a few wires that had to do with the AF system.

Wires in your lens? That is odd in itself....  Yeah sure


User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3905 times:

Quoting JeffM (Reply 7):
Could just be me....but that makes no sense at all.

The only way that i could get it to auto focus was to switch over to manual focus and then focus the lense. Once i had done that i would switch back over to auto focus and then try to shoot. Sometimes it would go "beep-beep" and focus so i could take the shot, but other times nothing would happen. I do know for sure that at full 135mm auto focus was impossible. I just didn't work.

So what I'm saying is that when i manual focus the lense and switch over to auto focus, its because the auto focus will now have an easier time focusing because i had already done the majority of it in manual focus. Basically, the auto focus only worked when it only had the slightest of focusing to do.

Quoting JeffM (Reply 7):
Wires in your lens? That is odd in itself....

How??


User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 9, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3882 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 4):
in manual mode does the viewfinder looked focus when you move the focus ring?

Nope, both the viewfinder and the resulting photo look unsharp.

Quoting Aviopic (Reply 5):
You have to check EU law Thierry, I think they have to.

Thanks for the hint Willem; will check that out!

Quoting DM (Reply 6):
The only way i could get it to AF properly was to focus it with the focusing ring in MF and then switch over to AF and take the shot once i had focused it properly in MF.

I get what you're saying Daniel but in my case the manual focus doesn't work neither in the mentionned ranges.

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3856 times:

Quoting ThierryD (Thread starter):
Since the Nikkor customer service was of no great help

OMG they are the worst. I know first hand too.

Quoting ThierryD (Thread starter):
who won't accept the US warranty of my lens

Why not send it to the US?


User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3848 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 10):
Why not send it to the US?

Since I will then spend at least the same amount for packaging and sending as I would for the repair not to mention that it will last an eternity before I get it back.

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3840 times:

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 11):
ince I will then spend at least the same amount for packaging and sending as I would for the repair

Didn't think Shipping would be that much from there. You sure? Just shove it in a box with some newspaper.  biggrin 

Did you get an estimate?


User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (6 years 11 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3758 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 12):
Didn't think Shipping would be that much from there. You sure?

Shipping forth and back from Europe to the US with packaging and insurance will easily cost you around 100Euros (~140$).
But since this issue is largely unknown to all the photo geeks I know I'm giving it for repair and see what it's all about.


Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 14, posted (6 years 11 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3721 times:

I had the same problem with mine. Sent it to Nikon - it came back still with the problem.

Sent it a second time - it came back fixed (under warranty).



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (6 years 11 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3715 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting Viv (Reply 14):
Sent it a second time - it came back fixed (under warranty).

Hi Viv!
Did they tell you what the problem was? And how much would it have cost without valid warranty (I can't find mine anymore  Sad)?

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 16, posted (6 years 11 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3681 times:

Hi Thierry,

No, I never found out what the prroblem was - or what the real cost would be.

If you have the sales receipt, you don't need the warranty.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 17, posted (6 years 11 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3651 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting Viv (Reply 16):
If you have the sales receipt

I've put it together with the warranty...  banghead 

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineYZFOO7F From Canada, joined May 2005, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (6 years 11 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3636 times:

Hey Thierry and Viv,

Besides the problems you've encountered with the 18-200, what would you say about the overall quality of the lens? I've read that the sharpness is degraded towards the edges of the photo and that the middle is the only spot thats ever sharp. Any comments? I'm thinking about getting one myself but this problem that you guys have had is making me nervous  Confused

Thanks,
Ryan



Promise me you'll always leave the ground
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 19, posted (6 years 11 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3634 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting YZFOO7F (Reply 18):
what would you say about the overall quality of the lens?

Hi Ryan!

In a nutshell: "It's one of the best lenses I know!"
In detail: with the Nikon 18-200mm you get a very flexible lens which allows you to shoot from wide angle to big zooms in top quality; it's sharp, precise and light sensitive. And all that for only around 760 Euros. I don't know any lens you can beat the Nikkor 18-200mm in flexibility/quality/price ratio.
I had for instance the Sigma 18-200mm before the Nikon and it offered less quality, was unsharp in the higher zoom ranges and had no VR.

Quoting YZFOO7F (Reply 18):
I've read that the sharpness is degraded towards the edges of the photo and that the middle is the only spot thats ever sharp.

Definitely NOT true!

But since pictures say more than a thousand words, here are a few which were all taken with the Nikkor 18-200mm:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Thierry Deutsch
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Thierry Deutsch



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Thierry Deutsch
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Thierry Deutsch



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Thierry Deutsch
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Thierry Deutsch



Just to show that it's effective in about any field.

And until now I've not experienced any problems with the lens and I've been using it extensively for almost a year now.

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (6 years 11 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3622 times:

Quoting ThierryD (Reply 13):
Shipping forth and back from Europe to the US with packaging and insurance will easily cost you around 100Euros (~140$).
But since this issue is largely unknown to all the photo geeks I know I'm giving it for repair and see what it's all about.

Wow, Guess I'm lucky Nikon is a short drive up the LIE for me.

Any update?


User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 21, posted (6 years 11 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3603 times:

It's simply a great lens. Reply 19 from Thierry says it all.


Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineYZFOO7F From Canada, joined May 2005, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (6 years 11 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3586 times:

Thank Thierry! Great pics too.

I think I'll go for this lens. Like you say, one of the most attractive things is its versatility.



Promise me you'll always leave the ground
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2069 posts, RR: 51
Reply 23, posted (6 years 11 months 5 hours ago) and read 3516 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 20):
Any update?

After 3 days (Vienna Nikon service rocks!!!  Smile) the lens is repaired for 53 Euros. The front lens needed some adjustments.

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Nikkor 18-200mm VR Advice? posted Tue Jan 3 2006 19:55:02 by TUNisia
Strange Issue With Rejection posted Thu Oct 6 2005 08:10:52 by Psych
Motive An Issue With This Shot? posted Mon Oct 23 2006 00:00:45 by Pavvyben
Nikkor 70-200 VR + TC posted Tue May 30 2006 10:00:38 by Jarek
How Does Sigma 70-300 Compare With Nikkor 70-300? posted Sun Jan 15 2006 14:26:45 by Aviationfreak
Sigma Confirm Issue With Nikon D200 posted Mon Dec 26 2005 14:34:45 by TACAA320
Quality Issue With This Photo posted Mon Nov 21 2005 01:24:18 by Viper0933
Opinions On Sigma 18-200mm Lens posted Sun Nov 20 2005 00:10:31 by Kukkudrill
Sigma 80-400mm OS Vs. Nikkor 80-400mm VR posted Thu Jul 14 2005 05:03:08 by Yanqui67
Nikon 70- 200mm VR Ordered, But... posted Sat Dec 18 2004 16:18:42 by Beechcraft