Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
I Need Some Help With This One  
User currently offlineManc From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 344 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 5005 times:

I'd like to get this one in the db.

Firstly rejected for soft

APPEAL_20070812_4RADB_030907_LHR.jpg

also here as I don't know how to find appealled photos

LHR.jpg" target=_blank>http://www.iesphotography.co.uk/4RADB_030907_LHR.jpg

Appealled as you can see and it got rejected for Soft, Dark and common.

Taking this on board, here is a re-edit, so is this better?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/4RADB_030907_LHRa.jpg


No URL in signature please
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 4992 times:

I wonder why the screener considered this to be a "common" image. I think it's very nice but a little blurry.

Ivan


User currently offlineTupolevTu154 From Germany, joined Aug 2004, 2186 posts, RR: 28
Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 4950 times:

That's an absolute stunner!

Tom Big grin



Atheists - Winning since 33 A.D.
User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 30
Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 4940 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting Fly747 (Reply 1):
I wonder why the screener considered this to be a "common" image.

Because there are already 106 images of this a/c in the DB, common refers to the number of pics in the DB, not the nature of the picture.

COMMON
The aircraft depicted in your photos was very common in the Airliners.net database, with many photos of this aircraft already present on the website.

In this case the standards for acceptance are higher than for aircraft of which we have fewer or no photographs on the database, and only photos of exceptional quality will be accepted.

Please understand that this is not a judgement on your abilities, as your picture may be of a technical quality which may be very decent. However, due to the common nature of the aircraft photographed, the highest standard is applied to avoid substantial duplication.

When uploading you should always check our database for the amount of photos we have of the particular aircraft you are uploading. If a particular aircraft or registration is common in our database, you may increase the likelihood your photos of it will be accepted by photographing it from an unusual angle, under exceptional lighting conditions, or with interesting scenery in the background.

Regarding your reedit, did you use s/h tool? I'm asking becuase the shadows look a bit on the bright side...but overall I'd say it's not dark. The sharpening is indeed tricky under such lightning, but to me it feels that in some areas it could use still some more selective sharpening (shadows).
This is a tough one but certainly one worth the effort! Good luck!



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineFly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4893 times:

Thank you Andres, I am aware of that. As the quote you provided states...

Quoting Acontador (Reply 3):
you may increase the likelihood your photos of it will be accepted by photographing it from an unusual angle, under exceptional lighting conditions, or with interesting scenery in the background.

...thus my remark since both the angle and lighting are more interesting then your usual high-sun side on shot.

Ivan


User currently offlineManc From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 344 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 4868 times:

Andres, No I didnt use the s/h tool, I don't like that tool. The original is RAW so I use RAWshooter. sliders on the histogram are brought right in.

Well I'll chance that edit unless any screeners pitch in....?



No URL in signature please
User currently offlineJid From Barbados, joined Dec 2004, 975 posts, RR: 31
Reply 6, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 4862 times:

Hi Ian, well being supper critical the nose is a little soft, there are jaggies starting to show on the trailing edges and there is a slight lack of contrast.
http://www.airliners.net/uf/536886657/1187334009tDq09g.jpg

Nice shot all the same, don't forget you can't get a common rejection on it's own so if you crack the quality then you should be ok.

Good luck .. Jid

Oh P.S. Don't be too upset after Sunday !!!!

[Edited 2007-08-17 09:04:39]


G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
User currently offlineManc From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 344 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 4832 times:

Cheers Jid. supper or even super critical is not good!!! Maybe I can touch up the contrast a bit, afraid of the dark rejection which appeared on the appeal to be honest.

I'll be in the red section at Eastlands on Sunday, I'm posting nothing about the scoreline what with your lucky start to the season!!



No URL in signature please
User currently offlineManc From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 344 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 4760 times:

Thanks for your help again guys


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ian Schofield




No URL in signature please
User currently offlineJid From Barbados, joined Dec 2004, 975 posts, RR: 31
Reply 9, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 4760 times:

Hey Ian glad it made it in (unlike any of your efforts on Sunday!!!).


G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
User currently offlineManc From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 344 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 4757 times:

Cheers Jid, yeah I was stood in the Council House not a happy chap surrounded by bitters. Although we were the better team by far but its putting the ball in the net that counts....stuffy deflection  Wink


No URL in signature please
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Need Some Help With Info On This One... posted Fri Sep 2 2005 00:20:35 by Johndm1957
Help With This One Please? posted Sun Jul 8 2007 21:47:22 by Damien846
Need Some Help With Editing posted Sun May 13 2007 20:19:25 by BoeingOnFinal
I Need Some Help With Image Quality posted Wed Jan 24 2007 06:05:03 by DeltaJet757
Help With This One Please. posted Sat Sep 10 2005 21:25:41 by JAT74L
Need Some Help With Badquality Rejections posted Thu Jun 2 2005 04:21:12 by JohnP
Need Some Help With Rejections Please posted Sat Apr 2 2005 13:39:22 by EDDL
Little Help With This One posted Tue Mar 1 2005 21:03:15 by JetJock22
Need Some Help With The Upload Features... posted Thu Dec 2 2004 13:03:45 by Thom@s
Need Some Help With These Rejections.. posted Sat Sep 25 2004 18:42:27 by Delta777-XXX