Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Size Requirements Changed?  
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2317 times:

Did the size requirements change silently ?
or does this statement

Quote:

Rigid rules are for theoretics and academics.

from Consistency (by WakeTurbulence Aug 9 2007 in Aviation Photography) also apply for size now?

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineClickhappy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2313 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Peter, could you possibly be any more passive aggressive?

If you have a link to a picture, or a concern about a picture, show it to us, either here or in private. If not, well...well, you know the rest.


User currently offlineThierryD From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2313 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Thread starter):
Did the size requirements change silently ?

Hi Peter!

Nope they are still the same AFAIK. Why?

Thierry


User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2300 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 1):
Peter, could you possibly be any more passive aggressive?

I was just asking a question out of interest. Nothing more nothing less. Didn't know that asking is passive agressive.

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 1):
If you have a link to a picture,

Nope I don't have. See above. Just a question.

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 1):
If not, well...well, you know the rest.

Please elaborate.


User currently offlineClickhappy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2290 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

So, you woke up today, went to work, came home, poured a glass of cheap Chilean wine and asked yourself, "I wonder if Airliners.net has changed their photo size requirements?"

The answer is no, we have not changed the size requirements.

Guess we can lock this thread now?


User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2275 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 4):
The answer is no, we have not changed the size requirements.

Thanks you for the answer.

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 4):
Guess we can lock this thread now?

If you want to. But since when are threads locked that quick.

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 4):
So, you woke up today, went to work, came home, poured a glass of cheap Chilean wine and asked yourself, "I wonder if Airliners.net has changed their photo size requirements?"

I wonder why you think you have to use something which we chatted about years back totally off topic? If you have an issue send me an e-mail and we can clear it out but don't get down on this level. This is not how i know you.

Peter


User currently offlineClickhappy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2269 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Nothing wrong with wine from Chile Big grin

User currently offlineAcontador From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2251 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 6):
Nothing wrong with wine from Chile

Well Royal, I certainly hope so  Wink !!! While I know that outside our country, our wines are mostly known to be cheap in terms of quality/price relationship, I can guarantee you that you'd be surprised about the more expensive high-end/quality ones...just have a look at the latest Winespectator and you'll see. Not that I'm particularly qualified to talk about wines, nor is this wine.net....


User currently offlineUnattendedBag From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2239 times:

Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Reply 5):
But since when are threads locked that quick.

Threads are locked when the question is answered.

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 4):
The answer is no, we have not changed the size requirements.

The question has been answered. What is left to debate?


User currently offlineTZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2152 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

As Peter no longer needs to worry about his images being rejected for being an inappropriate size, this thread can be locked.

Good night.

TZ


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Reducing Image Size Problem, PS Elements5 posted Mon Jul 30 2007 11:21:15 by Wolverine
Compact Flash Size? posted Tue Jul 3 2007 00:59:33 by Fxfan
Size Rejections posted Fri Jun 22 2007 12:01:07 by DerekF
Archive Photos -> Size posted Sat Jun 16 2007 19:27:53 by Muellae
Motive And Size? posted Sun Jun 10 2007 20:41:35 by Damien846
Reducing Size Without Reducing Quality posted Wed Apr 18 2007 14:16:32 by Mhodgson
Who's Camera Changed Time Automatically? posted Tue Mar 13 2007 20:13:09 by TedTAce
ZRH Spotters: Does Size Matter? posted Wed Feb 21 2007 14:56:55 by AC773
Size Limits For Newbies? posted Tue Jan 23 2007 23:32:58 by Interpaul
Picture Size Queery posted Mon Jan 8 2007 17:48:19 by EINA330