Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Size Requirements Changed?  
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Posted (7 years 4 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2267 times:

Did the size requirements change silently ?
or does this statement

Quote:

Rigid rules are for theoretics and academics.

from Consistency (by WakeTurbulence Aug 9 2007 in Aviation Photography) also apply for size now?


-
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9664 posts, RR: 68
Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2263 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Peter, could you possibly be any more passive aggressive?

If you have a link to a picture, or a concern about a picture, show it to us, either here or in private. If not, well...well, you know the rest.


User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2081 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2263 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SUPPORT

Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Thread starter):
Did the size requirements change silently ?

Hi Peter!

Nope they are still the same AFAIK. Why?

Thierry



"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2250 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 1):
Peter, could you possibly be any more passive aggressive?

I was just asking a question out of interest. Nothing more nothing less. Didn't know that asking is passive agressive.

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 1):
If you have a link to a picture,

Nope I don't have. See above. Just a question.

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 1):
If not, well...well, you know the rest.

Please elaborate.



-
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9664 posts, RR: 68
Reply 4, posted (7 years 4 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2240 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

So, you woke up today, went to work, came home, poured a glass of cheap Chilean wine and asked yourself, "I wonder if Airliners.net has changed their photo size requirements?"

The answer is no, we have not changed the size requirements.

Guess we can lock this thread now?


User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 5, posted (7 years 4 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2225 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 4):
The answer is no, we have not changed the size requirements.

Thanks you for the answer.

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 4):
Guess we can lock this thread now?

If you want to. But since when are threads locked that quick.

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 4):
So, you woke up today, went to work, came home, poured a glass of cheap Chilean wine and asked yourself, "I wonder if Airliners.net has changed their photo size requirements?"

I wonder why you think you have to use something which we chatted about years back totally off topic? If you have an issue send me an e-mail and we can clear it out but don't get down on this level. This is not how i know you.

Peter



-
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9664 posts, RR: 68
Reply 6, posted (7 years 4 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2219 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Nothing wrong with wine from Chile Big grin

User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 30
Reply 7, posted (7 years 4 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2201 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 6):
Nothing wrong with wine from Chile

Well Royal, I certainly hope so  Wink !!! While I know that outside our country, our wines are mostly known to be cheap in terms of quality/price relationship, I can guarantee you that you'd be surprised about the more expensive high-end/quality ones...just have a look at the latest Winespectator and you'll see. Not that I'm particularly qualified to talk about wines, nor is this wine.net....



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineUnattendedBag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2342 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (7 years 4 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2189 times:

Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Reply 5):
But since when are threads locked that quick.

Threads are locked when the question is answered.

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 4):
The answer is no, we have not changed the size requirements.

The question has been answered. What is left to debate?



Slower traffic, keep right
User currently offlineTZ From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2003, 1085 posts, RR: 52
Reply 9, posted (7 years 4 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2102 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

As Peter no longer needs to worry about his images being rejected for being an inappropriate size, this thread can be locked.

Good night.

TZ



TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Reducing Image Size Problem, PS Elements5 posted Mon Jul 30 2007 11:21:15 by Wolverine
Compact Flash Size? posted Tue Jul 3 2007 00:59:33 by Fxfan
Size Rejections posted Fri Jun 22 2007 12:01:07 by DerekF
Archive Photos -> Size posted Sat Jun 16 2007 19:27:53 by Muellae
Motive And Size? posted Sun Jun 10 2007 20:41:35 by Damien846
Reducing Size Without Reducing Quality posted Wed Apr 18 2007 14:16:32 by Mhodgson
Who's Camera Changed Time Automatically? posted Tue Mar 13 2007 20:13:09 by TedTAce
ZRH Spotters: Does Size Matter? posted Wed Feb 21 2007 14:56:55 by AC773
Size Limits For Newbies? posted Tue Jan 23 2007 23:32:58 by Interpaul
Picture Size Queery posted Mon Jan 8 2007 17:48:19 by EINA330