Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
No Moans About The Length Of The Queue?  
User currently offlineLumix From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 114 posts, RR: 4
Posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 7962 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Unusual.....it's now mid-August and the Q is only at circa 5000+!! Truly amazing when you think it's been up at 12-14000 in previous years at this time.

I'd just like to thank the hard working sceeners who must be working day & night to keep it down to that sort of level!

Well done!

Martin.

109 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3884 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 7927 times:

Yep, great job!  thumbsup 

Peter



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineBmiBaby737 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1784 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 7925 times:

Quoting Lumix (Thread starter):
Truly amazing when you think it's been up at 12-14000 in previous years at this time.

Compare last years weather in the United Kingdom, with this years...  banghead   cold   raincloud 

Quoting Lumix (Thread starter):
I'd just like to thank the hard working screeners who must be working day & night to keep it down to that sort of level!

This is a very good achievement nonetheless; well done!


User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5568 posts, RR: 64
Reply 3, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 7914 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi all

Thanks for the comments.

Some screeners are working hard so thanks to them. Yes, some not so nice weather in the UK (surprise surprise). Also we are not seeing a lot of card dumping recently which is good. I think photographers are pre-screening their own stuff before uploading. The message is getting through.

Regards

Gary


User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3122 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 7893 times:

It would be even better if the upload limit were something like 10 photos per week for each photographer, this is just an example.

Luis


User currently offlineDeltaAVL From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1893 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 7851 times:

Quoting Granite (Reply 3):
Also we are not seeing a lot of card dumping recently which is good.

Do people really do that? Wow!

How obnoxious!

And yes, great job, screeners!

[Edited 2007-08-22 18:12:46]


"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
User currently offlineKFLLCFII From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3288 posts, RR: 31
Reply 6, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 7834 times:

Well, if they had just halted the uploads (save for priority shots) for a week or two like I propsed X number of months ago, we wouldn't even be in this position.  Wink


"About the only way to look at it, just a pity you are not POTUS KFLLCFII, seems as if we would all be better off."
User currently onlineRCoulter From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 536 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 7823 times:

Thanks for all the hard work guys!

User currently offlineOpso1 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 527 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 7775 times:

Thanks to all of the screeners for their hard work. My only concern, is this going to be a blip which gives everyone more uploads free in the queue so by 23/24 Aug there are 2000+ added back into the queue?

OPSO1


User currently offlineUnattendedbag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2311 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7741 times:

Quoting Mirage (Reply 4):
It would be even better if the upload limit were something like 10 photos per week for each photographer, this is just an example.

Bite your tongue!!

Quoting KFLLCFII (Reply 6):
Well, if they had just halted the uploads (save for priority shots) for a week or two like I propsed X number of months ago, we wouldn't even be in this position.

Don't even think about it!!



Slower traffic, keep right
User currently offlineBmiBaby737 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1784 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7719 times:

Wow you guys, you're really clearing it fast now! 6 photos accepted tonight of mine, 0 rejected; some from different queue dates!

2007-08-18: 317 photos 99 photos not screened yet 218 photos currently in screening
2007-08-19: 1095 photos 1016 photos not screened yet 79 photos currently in screening
2007-08-20: 1156 photos 1156 photos not screened yet
2007-08-21: 1107 photos 1107 photos not screened yet
2007-08-22: 977 photos 977 photos not screened yet

 Wow!  bigthumbsup 


User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 7690 times:

Great job screeners!

There are a total of 4586 photos from 1129 photographers waiting to be processed on the upload page (2 waiting for Johan and 4584 waiting for the screeners).

DM


User currently offlineBigbrokerbo From Germany, joined May 2005, 20 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 7682 times:

Hello screener crew,

thank you very much for your hard work!. Nice to see that the queue is getting smaller and
smaller so fast.

Greetings
Uwe


User currently offlineUnattendedBag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2311 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 7652 times:

There are downsides to this though. Currently, there are 951 new photos added to the database in the last 24 hours. A lot of photos are getting lost in the "dump". Just a different perspective.


Slower traffic, keep right
User currently offlineLanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 14, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 7650 times:

Hi screeners

Thank you really very much for the effort you´re putting on the queue. It´s awesome.  cool 
I just found out when I got the result of a pic I uploaded just on Saturday! Unbelievable!

Quoting Granite (Reply 3):
a lot of card dumping

What does this mean?

Cheers!  Smile
Lanas.-



"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 65
Reply 15, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 7646 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Lanas (Reply 14):
a lot of card dumping

It means people take 130 shots on one day and upload them all in 3 or 4 goes.

We have indeed put a lot of effort in the past days and we deserve the praise Wink Seriously though, screening is fun when the queue is going down each time you open the screening page. Hopefully, and I say hopefully we can get it below 4000 in the next few days.

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineJRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4650 posts, RR: 50
Reply 16, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 7639 times:

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 15):
Hopefully, and I say hopefully we can get it below 4000 in the next few days.

no chance, I just uploaded extra! (a quick look at my upload stats will show the full extend of that  Silly ) Great work guys!



For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 17, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 7634 times:

Well there are 6 less, as of 1 minute ago I pulled my shots that were in the queue.  crowded 

User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1417 posts, RR: 31
Reply 18, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7589 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

A big THANKS to all the team for their efforts have been noticed  bigthumbsup  !

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 15):
Hopefully, and I say hopefully we can get it below 4000 in the next few days.

Never seen that before, but then again I wasn't around in 1999...

Quoting UnattendedBag (Reply 13):
There are downsides to this though. Currently, there are 951 new photos added to the database in the last 24 hours. A lot of photos are getting lost in the "dump". Just a different perspective.

That's actually true. Then again, the 'special' pictures will always get their audience, as they quickly jump to the front page. But this will become less of a problem once the screening throughput is stable again.



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 65
Reply 19, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7586 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I see, still don't see his point...

Quoting Acontador (Reply 21):
Never seen that before, but then again I wasn't around in 1999...

A little a.net history would tell you it was at 0 about 2 years ago Smile

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1417 posts, RR: 31
Reply 20, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7580 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Tim, what the *** are you doing up so late  Wink ???

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 22):
A little a.net history would tell you it was at 0 about 2 years ago

No that would be cool,  crossfingers  to see it in my lifetime Big grin !



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 65
Reply 21, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7581 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Still working on the queue Smile


Alderman Exit
User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1417 posts, RR: 31
Reply 22, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7575 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Clearly you're not married and have no small kids   !
Seriously, good job to all of the screeners, you've worked quite a lot lately, and deserve some rest.

[Edited 2007-08-23 01:33:09]


Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 65
Reply 23, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7569 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Acontador (Reply 25):
Clearly you're not married and have no small kids

Fortunately, no Wink

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 24, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7565 times:

Very well done Screeners! Dropped an E-Mail to you "personally" also, you deserve it.  Smile


Got 17 photos accepted last night / this morning and even got a photo on the front page.  Silly

Thanks very much guys, very fast screening, clear personal comments, and also quick replies in the forum.


Keepupthegoodwork!

Dave


25 Dvincent : I've simply just stopped uploading. Haven't had time to go out shooting lately and the stuff I was working on all got rejected. Sometimes having more
26 Granite : Hi all Despite the Chihuahua nipping comments going around the screeners are doing a fantastic job on ploughing through the queue. Thanks for supporti
27 Dazbo5 : A big thanks to the screeners from me. I can't keep up with you at the moment. No sooner have I uploaded a shot, it's in the screening queue it seems!
28 Granite : Hi Lanas It means that someone went out one morning and photographed 100 subjects and then go upload 100 images to the site. We all know you cannot up
29 Post contains images Javibi : j
30 JRadier : Yeah thanks for the swift rejection! (totally warranted)
31 Post contains images TimdeGroot : Yep that was a nasty dustspot
32 JRadier : So it was you!!!!!!! If I were you I wouldn't go nightshooting next month, because if I'll see you................... (I'll probably shake your hand
33 Psych : I have been away on holiday and the queue certainly looking a lot healthier than when I left (I am a great believer that a shorter queue is a good thi
34 Post contains images Mirrodie : Nice job gentlemen. I'ts nice not having to wait up to 2 weeks to hear word. Keep it up.
35 Post contains images KLM772ER : The queue is down to 4100.. Great Job! You must have had a lot of free time in the last few days (no wonder with the current weather in Europe right n
36 Relic : Great job screeners. Had a photo accepted after 4 days.Thats the fastest for me so far. Cheers Andy
37 Post contains images SNATH : There are a total of 3967 photos from 988 photographers waiting to be processed on the upload page (2 waiting for Johan and 3965 waiting for the scree
38 Prat : Damn. We photogs gotta get our crap together! They're beating us into submission! Good work on getting it down so quickly. Would love it if it was alw
39 Post contains images Walter2222 : Good job, screeners! I wish that the people "working" on the repair of my editing screen would also work evenly hard ...my queue is empty since yester
40 Scottieprecord : Thanks so much guys for all your work! -Mike
41 Chukcha : And then, after they would have started accepting uploads again, the photographers would have dumped all the backlog which they ordinarily would have
42 PictureThis : Sound job nice one... I noticed this myself when I uploaded my massive 5 shots a few weeks ago. Now its up to me to get some more edited and stop bein
43 TimdeGroot : And let's not forget all the interesting images being added right now, lots to enjoy! Tim
44 Sluger020889 : I figured this was fitting for this thread. I just had two pics (uploaded roughly the same time) make it through the queue quicker than they did on JP
45 Post contains images AirMalta : well done to all screeners in keeping the que low hope this will continue to be as low as you can go guys malc
46 Post contains images AirMalta : Also forgot to say in my previous message its also nice to see some positive comments towards the screening team which I think most of time we always
47 Ghost77 : I've been a loyal contributor to this site for the past +7 years. I recently join the team and i'm really amazed with all the hard work and excellent
48 Post contains images Vaporlock : A sincere thanks to all of the photo screeners......you work very hard trying to be fair and getting all those photos through the screening process.
49 Post contains images Monteycarlos : I just uploaded a couple on Wednesday night and I've already got the results on Friday morning... you screeners are doing a fantastic job! Btw, what a
50 Post contains links and images Domjan : The weather (at least in CH) is very good at the moment, still sunshine, but no heat-haze (proof: some of my latest additions: http://www.airliners.n
51 Post contains images INNflight : Hah!! I wish....rain since four days here, and even quite some snow
52 Scottieprecord : Not only was the queue brought down, y'all have maintained it at an impressively low level.. Fantastic! Just out of curiosity, is there any pressure f
53 TimdeGroot : No pressure just motivation! Tim
54 Post contains images Silver1SWA : I have noticed! In recent weeks, some of the most viewed have been very interesting indeed even though they might have issues that would have caused
55 Post contains images Granite : Hi all Thanks for all your comments. Weather has been good in the north of Scotland for once which makes my two weeks off work even better! Screened q
56 D L X : I agree. A short queue decreases frustration. Good work, gentlemen. (Are there any lady screeners?)
57 Clickhappy : Just Granite.
58 Post contains images Codeshare : The numbers are really impressive: less than 900 photogs and 3500 photos. Great job KS/codeshare
59 Monteycarlos : Cool. It would be good if you guys got a greater reward for your efforts.
60 Eadster : Don't encourage them!!!! The Q always seems to be at reasonable number when I'm away. When I get back, edit shots I like and upload, the Q has sky ro
61 Post contains images JRadier : I'd call that an improvement over last year . Keep it up and I might find myself in the alps again this winter.
62 Post contains images Granite : Mike Infact Demand Media have never commented on the queue size. All new to them but maybe over time we will get our asses kicked if it is not being m
63 Post contains images Granite : Royal You may just find out for yourself before the year is out Regards Gary
64 Michlis : Kudos to the screeners...it took less than a week for one of my photos to be reviewed.
65 Granite : Hi all The new screeners are doing a great job and are so enthusiastic. Regards Gary
66 Post contains images PhilGil : Very impressive work screeners, my most recent upload was rejected in record time . In all seriousness, you guys have been doing an outstanding job al
67 Post contains images PipoA380 : Wow just checked after a week away from a.net and the Q is just above 3'000! Excellent work there, let's hope we can keep it down to that low!! Kind r
68 Post contains images Granite : Hi all Not wanting to blow my own trumpet but I have been getting stuck into the queue as I am on a two week holiday from work Been getting up early t
69 Post contains images Coninpa : Congrats and thank you screeners ! Photogs (at least me... ) have now to make an effort to upload as fast as you empty the queue Great job ! Cheers Pa
70 D L X : Are my eyes deceiving me? Is that really a 3-day queue?
71 Damien846 : Now below 3k!! Well done all!
72 Post contains images Aviopic : Come on guys........ we better start uploaded like mad. Otherwise we end up with a bunch of volunteers without work and from my own experience I can t
73 Granite : Hi Even smaller............I screened an image taken 2 days ago and it was good enough for a direct add. Regards Gary
74 Michlis : Kudos again...my resubmission of a rejected photo only took two days to be re-reviewed...rejected again, but only for info; I've made an appeal.
75 Post contains images PipoA380 : Hope you're well too! And yes, probably very soon!
76 JRadier : And we're under 3000!!!
77 Post contains images Aero145 : Yikes, I'm going to MOAN! THE TIME I HAVE TO WAIT FOR MY PHOTOS TO BE SCREENED IS TOO SHORT!!! MOOOOAN! [Edited 2007-09-11 14:46:50]
78 TransIsland : You guys better slow down, otherwise all our recently accepted photos will be disqualified once they discover you were on performance enhancing drugs
79 Post contains images AirMalta : Getting better nd better......shorter and shorter Good luck screeners malc
80 Beechcraft : I don´t visit the homepage that often, as all important pages are bookmarked, but i just checked it out and found this: "12850 photos have been added
81 Post contains images ThierryD : I thought Lufthansa was getting onboard Internet access!? No more excuses then! Thierry
82 Post contains images Monteycarlos : That would go down well in the "What monitors do the screeners use" thread. Beechcraft uses a LH supplied 10'' chair mounted monitor from his economy
83 Post contains images ThierryD : I believe Denis has access to much better screens in the front of the plane. Thierry
84 Monteycarlos : In a CRJ? Not likely.
85 Post contains images ThierryD : One word: ElectronicFlightBag   Those lucky beggars all have their own laptop to fly with. Thierry[Edited 2007-09-13 10:55:54]
86 Monteycarlos : Hahahaha fair enough. Let 'screening in the skies of europe' commence!
87 Beechcraft : ...which has the worst Monitor/graphic card i have ever seen...wish i could screen on it. But all i can do while i´m away is saying, yes, that photo
88 QANTAS077 : I haven't uploaded for a while because I've been taking time out for other things in life, I'm happy to note that the photos I've submitted have been
89 Post contains images MUC_Spotter : >Of those, 4 are yours. > >The following is an overview of the current upload queue situation: > >2007-09-12: 117 photos 72 photos not screened yet 45
90 Post contains images JRadier : And another milestone! With just 1992 photo's in the queue the screeners crashed through the 2000 barrier on their way to a finish at 0 (hey, we can a
91 DM : Great work screeners. Its really great to have your photos screened in 2 days! DM
92 Post contains images INNflight : I think it should take longer again.....where's the fun in it Take a break guys Well done! F.
93 Post contains images JRadier : You're hardly uploading anything anyway (hear me ), so please shut up . See you again in INN yeah?
94 Post contains images Silver1SWA : Wow, this is nuts! When was the last time photos were screened on the same day they were uploaded?! Photos uploaded earlier today are now in screening
95 Mx330 : OMG!!!! Seriously it took exactly 17:30 hrs for my last upload to get into the DB! That is some serious work in here!!! Congrats all!!! Juan APM
96 Pepef : I almost wish I hadn't sold my EF 100-400mm and EF-S 10-22mm lenses. I only used them for aviation photography. -Pepef-
97 Post contains images Chukcha : And that's where my acceptance rating loses any meaning. I would never be able to upload 25 pictures a day ... Cheers, Andrei
98 Post contains images Walter2222 : Come on screeners, it is no fun anymore I will have to change my tactics now... I used to upload a couple, then asking others on the forum for advice
99 Clickhappy : Tight, hard working crew. Wondering where all the haters are now? I know some have been banned but are reading this. They will go sideways when they
100 Post contains images Granite : Hello Regards Gary
101 Post contains images INNflight : AAAAAND the well-deserved romantic dinner goes tooooooooooo: Royal and Gary cheers guys!
102 Post contains images Granite : Hello And that may happen by the end of the year Regards Gary
103 Post contains images JRadier : waaaaaaay too much info, get back screening
104 Post contains images Granite : Jurgen I can multi-task....currently screening, processing some of my own pics, about to help a photographer with processing, answering e-mails from d
105 UA935 : Gary, Can you not squeeze a beer into that multi tasking? Nice one on the queue. Regards Simon
106 Post contains images AirMalta : gary no wonder you are getting see you mate malcolm
107 JK : Hey, Great job screeners ! My compliments. Greetings Johan Knijn
108 Ghost77 : Yeaaaahaa!!!! Tough work it's been, lots of fun, hope everyone is enjoying the queue as it is now!!! g77
109 Post contains images Silver1SWA : I love the way things are going right now. However, I do have to wonder... In the long run, will things continue this way, or is this just a temporary
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Questions About The Quality Of My Latest Few posted Mon Aug 6 2001 09:49:38 by Aer Lingus
The Spice Of Life! posted Mon May 14 2007 19:30:39 by Scbriml
The Future Of Aviation Photography posted Thu Apr 12 2007 10:34:17 by LIPH
Who Took The Picture Of 747 In The A.net Logo? posted Tue Mar 27 2007 20:53:38 by Deaphen
The Hypocrisy Of Exposure Time Requirements. posted Sat Jan 6 2007 13:19:53 by TedTAce
Lost The Hang Of It posted Fri Dec 8 2006 00:14:16 by Ptrjong
The Story Of My Life.... Bad Contrast posted Sat Dec 2 2006 16:03:41 by Chachu201
A Question For The Uploaders Of posted Thu Nov 23 2006 14:39:29 by 53Sqdn
The Process Of Screening Debate posted Thu Sep 14 2006 14:10:59 by Psych
Is Confidence Getting The Best Of Me? posted Mon Sep 11 2006 00:32:38 by San747