Two Bad Info Rejections — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Two Bad Info Rejections

Stefan171288 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1224 times:

Hi,

I had these two shots rejected for info.

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...filename=20070906_EPV022322378.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...main?filename=20070906_EPV0008.jpg

Should it be Untitled (FIS Air Service)?
Is the 2nd one ok as nose?

Regards
Stefan

2 replies: All unread, jump to last

Boeingfreak From Germany, joined May 2005, 398 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1208 times:

Hi,
I think you should have typed in Untitled (FIS Air Service) as there are no titles on the aircraft that reveal the operator. Should work for both shots, the second one isn't a typical "category-nose" shot.

Florian

Ptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3770 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (5 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1194 times:

Quoting Boeingfreak (Reply 1):
the second one isn't a typical "category-nose" shot.

Maybe you're right, but it does show only the nose, doesn't it?

On the other hand, NOSE is only for airliners. This aircrraft is AIRLINER OR OTHER in the first row and the operator is an AIRLINE, but does that make a small turboprop an airliner? These categories... scratchchin

Peter

The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: