Flyboyseven From Canada, joined Feb 2007, 903 posts, RR: 1 Posted (5 years 9 months 6 hours ago) and read 2296 times:
I am not talking about the length of the que our anything like that. I am talking about how long the screener is looking at the picture for. I have always wondered this. When my first photo was accepted it said in screening for 1:20 minutes. I had thought that it would only take 15-20 minutes, but obviously I was wrong.
Are there any screeners out there that would be willing to share?
Cheers
Graham
As long as the number of take-offs equals the number of landings...you're doing fine.
DeltaAVL From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1893 posts, RR: 7 Reply 1, posted (5 years 9 months 6 hours ago) and read 2290 times:
Quoting Flyboyseven (Thread starter): When my first photo was accepted it said in screening for 1:20 minutes. I had thought that it would only take 15-20 minutes, but obviously I was wrong.
I'm admittedly not a screener, but it (obviously) doesn't actually take screeners an hour and twenty minutes to screen a single photograph. Photographs are taken in groups of a few hundred at a time, and while the upload stats page may say "Photo in screening", it doesn't necessarily mean that a screener is looking at that photo at that particular time. A few months ago, it was not uncommon to see a photo "currently in screening" for over a day.
My best guess (and a screener will know for sure) is that it takes about 30 seconds to screen a single photo.
"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
Silver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4553 posts, RR: 26 Reply 2, posted (5 years 9 months 5 hours ago) and read 2256 times:
Quoting DeltaAVL (Reply 1): not uncommon to see a photo "currently in screening" for over a day
Remember, often times photos pass through multiple stages of screening. I'm guessing every time a photo is passed on, it sits in another queue before being picked up by the next screener.
[Edited 2007-09-24 01:23:04]
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
TransIsland From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2032 posts, RR: 11 Reply 4, posted (5 years 9 months 3 hours ago) and read 2228 times:
I would hope that screening times vary depending on the photo... from under a second in obviously rejectable cases to quite a few minutes when it's a tight call.
I'm an aviation expert. I have Sky Juice for breakfast.
Granite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5542 posts, RR: 66 Reply 7, posted (5 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2147 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
Hello
Quoting DeltaAVL (Reply 1): Photographs are taken in groups of a few hundred at a time
This is an incorrect statement. For me photographs are taken in batches of 10 or 20. I don't think any screener take batches of a few hundred. If they do they are screening thumbnails
DeltaAVL From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1893 posts, RR: 7 Reply 8, posted (5 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2132 times:
Quoting Granite (Reply 7): This is an incorrect statement. For me photographs are taken in batches of 10 or 20. I don't think any screener take batches of a few hundred. If they do they are screening thumbnails
You misunderstood, I was referring to the photo upload page when it says something like "482 photos not screened yet 162 photos currently in screening."
"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
Dendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1606 posts, RR: 64 Reply 9, posted (5 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2099 times:
I had never really given a thought to this before but what Hongyin said was correct.
I did 20 earlier today, the most I ever select in a batch and these were for a first screening
I rejected 8, four with personals (two very poor, rejectable from a thumbnail though still checked properly),
I corrected the information on two, minor changes,
I passed on a comment to the next screener on three
I instant added two.