Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 52 Reply 3, posted (5 years 8 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1740 times:
Quoting GVerbeeck (Reply 1):
Titles and forward windows look soft to me. Could use a little extra USM.
Thanks.
Quoting Granite (Reply 2): What's the black dot near the tail?
I am assuming its a bird... are those not allowed anymore? It doesn't have the dust spot aesthetics so I left it.
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 52 Reply 5, posted (5 years 8 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1691 times:
If it cannot be fixed, I’ll just chalk this one up as a golden opportunity gone down the drain. Mother Nature did its part to make this hideous livery look halfway decent at least.
Chukcha From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1935 posts, RR: 8 Reply 6, posted (5 years 8 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1688 times:
Quoting Maiznblu_757 (Reply 3): It doesn't have the dust spot aesthetics so I left it.
I once uploaded a helicopter photo from an airshow where there were four "dots" - aircraft, flying in formation in a fair distance. It got rejected for "dirty". Appeal with the explanation that the "dots" were aircraft didn't help. After I cloned them out, it got accepted.
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 52 Reply 7, posted (5 years 8 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1643 times:
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 52 Reply 9, posted (5 years 8 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1619 times:
Quoting Bubbles (Reply 8): Stands a chance. The contrast is just slightly high. And I don't like that black dot near the tailfin, either.
Very weird, That was the same as the original photo. In my re-edit, I removed the "bird". I didn't change the name of the file however and maybe the file got crossed somehow with the original uploaded file?
Your reply speaks millions though.
Here it is again, with the name of the file changed. To contrasty?
WakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1288 posts, RR: 18 Reply 10, posted (5 years 8 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1616 times:
Chad, I would sharpen it to these standards, and it should make the cut.
-Matt
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 52 Reply 11, posted (5 years 8 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1530 times:
Now now gentlemen. Can we all get along  Â
Matt brings up a good point in his last post:
Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 12): but also to point out that standards seem to be pretty far off sometimes, as seen in this thread.
I think the screeners (as a whole) are doing a great job.
Now, can I get some more input on my 763? Royal, you mentioned that it wasnt for you due to the "harsh midday light". It was midday, but the light isnt bad at all to me.
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9444 posts, RR: 72 Reply 12, posted (5 years 8 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1525 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
He doesn't bring up a good point, and it was weak sauce that my post was deleted.
If you have a problem with a photo, alert the screeners.
Chad, I am sure your buddy Matt knows you emailed some on the screening team about that RJ photo being oversharp. If you want to play that way, no problem, but in the future don't ask for my help in private, like you did today.
I find it offensive you want help in private yet you mock our work in public.
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 52 Reply 13, posted (5 years 8 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1515 times:
Royal,
Relax.
Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 12): If you have a problem with a photo, alert the screeners.
He is the one that pointed it out to me in the very beginning (Sunday) I then emailed you to alert you, simple as that. Yes I knew about this photo because of him and told him that I emailed you to let you know.
Matt could have posted the original photo, which I wouldnt have condoned (and that isnt like him anyhow). In my opinion it was meant as a joke, nothing more nothing less.
Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 12): I find it offensive you want help in private yet you mock our work in public.
Where did I mock your work?
I asked for your opinion concerning my AA 777 photo. I didnt get opinion, I got something even better, thank you.
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 52 Reply 15, posted (5 years 8 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1475 times:
Maiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 52 Reply 18, posted (5 years 8 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1365 times:
Quoting Eadster (Reply 17): Hope things are ok with you Chad. Haven't heard from you in a long time.
Dazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5447 posts, RR: 53 Reply 19, posted (5 years 8 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1341 times:
To me the first one looks absolutely fine, the second has jaggies over the Delta titles.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, 
From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 245 posts, 
From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5542 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 225 posts, 
From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 1935 posts, 
From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1193 posts, 
 
Printer friendly format 
