Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
38%... Prescreening Help  
User currently offlineScottieprecord From UK - England, joined Jul 2004, 1363 posts, RR: 7
Posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2259 times:

Alright, so seeing as my acceptance rate now stands at 38%, I'm feeling the need to do a little prescreening on some of the shots I'm not quite sure about. Any opinions on these are welcome and greatly appreciated. Thanks!

1) http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/9708/n11524ma4.jpg
N11524 - can't decide for the life of me whether or not this shot is level

2) http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/5420/n640swmx7.jpg
N640SW - I love the vortices, but am unsure about the quality

3) http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/2461/n312jcnr3.jpg
N312JC - The sun hadn't risen yet. Unsure if it's too dark or not, and if the quality is good enough. And there's a weird arch-kinda-thing with it's base at the top of the tail... I have no idea what that is. To the best of my memory, I don't think there's any structure like that. Could that possibly be condensation?

Preciate the help!

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineThierryD From Luxembourg, joined Dec 2005, 2157 posts, RR: 37
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2254 times:

Hi Mike!

Don't get discouraged; the good thing about low acceptance ratios is that from a certain point it can only get better!  Wink

1) Taking the taxiway as reference I'd say it needs around 0.2° CCW rotation. However the shot also looks soft/blurry and oversharpened in places (cheatlines!).
2) again soft/blurry (nose section fuselage) and oversharpened in places (flaps)
3) pretty nice for a panning shot; needs a little more USM and jaggies on the tail removed.

Good luck!


"Go ahead...make my day"
User currently offlineAussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1779 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2251 times:

They look fairly good,first one looks good,2nd doesnt look too bad,3rd one is abit oversharpened at rear and blurry at front.

User currently offlineJid From Barbados, joined Dec 2004, 981 posts, RR: 25
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2251 times:

No 1 - Looks level but overexposed and blurry.

2 - Lacking in contrast.

3 - Like it, great panning shot. The arch thing maybe a little off putting and no I have no idea what it is either!

Good luck .. Jid

G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Motive? Some Prescreening Help Please posted Wed Jun 27 2007 10:18:08 by Glapira
Some Prescreening Help Please posted Tue May 22 2007 22:12:21 by Acontador
Prescreening Help posted Sun May 6 2007 11:31:33 by Chachu201
Prescreening Help posted Sat Dec 23 2006 01:15:27 by Ivob
Prescreening Help posted Thu Nov 23 2006 23:19:39 by Ivob
Prescreening Help Please... posted Wed Nov 15 2006 05:24:11 by Scottieprecord
New Memeber & Prescreening Help posted Sat Sep 30 2006 17:45:49 by Ivob
Prescreening Help Please... Bad Distance? posted Wed Mar 22 2006 23:30:04 by Glapira
Prescreening Help posted Thu Mar 9 2006 20:36:19 by Toliver
Prescreening Help--which Should I Upload/edit posted Sun Apr 25 2004 20:46:16 by United4everDEN