Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
I Need Help So Bad 14 Photos Rejected!  
User currently offlineSokol From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 284 posts, RR: 3
Posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3806 times:

I don't know what's going on, what's wrong but I feel so mad about these 14 photos rejected on same time !! take and look, and please help me.


1) COLOUR
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...0071017_HL7606_Taxiing_Y_KE257.jpg

2) QUALITY, COLOUR, SOFT
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ections/big/20071017_NWAC_Ramp.jpg

3) CONTRAST, SOFT, DARK
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...71017_HL7606_KE231_Airborne_32.jpg

4) QUALITY, SOFT, DARK
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r.../big/20071017_HL7462_Taxiing_T.jpg

5) QUALITY, SOFT, OVERSHARPENED
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r.../big/20071017_N274UP_Taxiing_R.jpg

6) QUALITY, MOTIV, SOFT, GRAY
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...s/big/20071017_N700CK_new_ramp.jpg

7) QUALITY, SOFT
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r.../20071017_C-FLWH_taking_off_32.jpg

8) SOFT
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r.../big/20071017_B-HUL_Rolling_32.jpg

9) QUALITY, LEVEL, SOFT
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...g/20071017_B-16107_Airborne_32.jpg

10) LEVEL, SOFT
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...g/20071017_B-HKS_Taking_off_32.jpg

11) QUALITY, CONTRAST, SOFT, COMMON
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ig/20071017_HL7462_Airborne_32.jpg

12) QUALITY, BLURRY
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r.../20071017_N616DL_Taking_off_32.jpg

13) QUALITY, SOFT
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...71017_N640US_Exit_Ramp_Taxiing.jpg

14) SOFT
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20071017_HL7600_Leaving_Soon.jpg

Only this photo is accpeted

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sokol Ymeri



Please help me for each photo. And if you think some of them works tell screeners because they are rejected so easy.
Do your best, Thanks all.

[Edited 2007-10-17 23:06:40]

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineG-CIVP From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 1335 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3777 times:

Had a quick look.

1) confused with this one, but the crop isn't great.
2) is soft although I like the shot.
3) quality - the sun on the nose kills it.
4) is back-lit.
5) is soft.
6) the steps kill this.
7) the object in the foreground kills it.
8) the rear stab. is cut off, so a poor crop.
9) soft again.
10) the reflection of the sun doesn't help.
11) soft
12) I don't like the grass obscuring the wheels slightly.
13) dark if anything.
14) the shadow of the lighting stand near the titles kills the shot for me.

These aren't that bad but the direction of the light (sun) seems to hinder rather than help, Anet likes clean, pin sharp photos on its database, so no half measures!


User currently offlineAussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1756 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3733 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

1)colour looks fine for KAL,crop on engine kills shot abit.
2)i'd agree,quite soft,fuzzy titles especially on main 3 aircraft.
3)colours look okay,soft on nose area.
4)backlit
5)looks okay to me.
6)think with the distracting clutter wont make it....
7)soft
8)soft but the crop cutting small portion off should be rejected too.
9)looks sharp on tail,rest looks soft...lighting.
10)yep its leaning right.
11)quality issues on nose.
12)looks blurry on nose
13)looks good.
14)soft agree.

hope this helps,but some stand another chance with more sharpening.


User currently offlineSokol From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 284 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3657 times:

Thank you so much G-CIVP and Aussie18 I appreciate you. I will re work on these photos.

To sharp them better what setting would be better tu unsharp them ?
I Used Unsharp Mask 350 up to 500, 0.2, 0. this time didn't work well. should i keep this Unshap setting or chanch it to different setting ?


User currently offlineAussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1756 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3607 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

I use 0.2,usually apply 100% at 0.2 at 1600x than resize to 1024x and apply about 400% straight and check to see if all detail is coming out good enough than erase jaggies,guess its a matter of looking at accepted photos and checking your edits and see whether their same quality and sharpness.

Dont feel alone about soft rejections,i went through a phase about 3months ago,getting oversharpened and soft rejections,i went from like 70 odd % acceptance to 40% and i just went back to comapring some accepted shots to my re edits and that seemed to work well as i uploaded the new ones and got accepted.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
I Need Help, 2 Rejected. posted Mon Sep 24 2007 19:57:19 by Sokol
Rejected "Level" - Need Help! posted Fri Feb 23 2007 19:54:00 by Parsival
Old Photos, Need Help posted Thu Feb 1 2007 17:54:49 by GertLOWG
First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help posted Thu Jul 6 2006 00:40:25 by Parsival
New Gear So I Need Help! posted Thu Jun 22 2006 05:08:40 by YULtoPEI
Bad Quality/common Rejection, Need Help posted Fri May 12 2006 00:23:05 by A388
Bad Info Rej - Requesting Help So I Don't Repeat posted Sun Mar 19 2006 17:17:32 by D L X
Rejection For Bad Centered, Need Help posted Tue Mar 7 2006 04:55:33 by A388
Bad Quality Rejection - Need Help posted Sat Dec 3 2005 09:19:12 by Parsival
Help With Bad Info Rejected posted Thu Oct 6 2005 08:45:09 by Andy777