Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
My Crap Remark To Screeners...  
User currently offlineShep2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3165 times:

A few days ago - this photo of mine was rejected for reasons - SOFT and not LEVEL...

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 708 File size: 440kb


I was a bit critical about this rejection - and lacking good judgement - sent a message to the screeners saying something like this -

"You gotta be kidding me? Soft and unlevel? This photo is not soft or unlevel... but if you don't want this new REG photo in the DB - it will not be included in the DB. Thanks for your time !!! Have a nice day !!! Keep up the great work !!!"

Gary Watt replied real quick - he remarked that since I was an x-screener - I should have known better than to send an email such as this...

Being a former screener - my ego is sometimes a bit over the top.

This photo was rejected by a screener-in-training - I should have been a bit more patient about it - maybe I should have emailed one of the head screeners of this matter - since the appeal function was not operating up to par at the time...

This photo is very insignificant - it is no big deal - as are all of my photos - not very important...

My apology to the screener-in-training who rejected it. I made a few bad calls while I was a screener-in-training and a few after being accepted to the screener team. There's alot happening now with Airliners.net - the matter of this photo is not at all important...

I think I need to take a rest - I will not be uploading photos anytime soon - lots of bugs in the system and I don't want to slow the system down in any way... I am sorry for my immature response to this rejection...  Smile

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineShep2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3156 times:

As I said previous - I will not be uploading anytime soon - but I would appreciate input on this rejection.. This one rejected for color - screener remark - "Reddish hue."



Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 711 File size: 388kb


User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1668 posts, RR: 61
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3148 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Terry
As an ex-screener you are very well aware that your outburst the other day is mild compared to what we do see.
However I am pleased to say that this is the first PUBLIC apology I have ever seen for such an outburst that could have remained between you and us. Thank you for that.
I know that everyone is feeling frustrated at the moment, and understandably as this damned site has become a part of the lives of all of us. Whilst no-one could pretend that things have gone smoothly, we can at least be sure that the problems are all being worked upon. I am not happy, (who could be ?) but we just have to grin and bear it don't we ?

As to the colour one
I have not seen this image and am pleased to see the helpful personal. I could see the red hue (cast) from the thumbnail. It is very evident in the sky though strangely not the rest of the image and a few units of cyan should easily correct that.

Mick Bajcar


User currently offlineShep2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3141 times:

Mick -

Thanks for your reply. I'm not trying to make anybody look bad. I'm simply too critical sometimes... The sky on hazy days can be tricky. The color of the aircraft looks true - as you agree - whites are white. However, hazy day sunlight sometimes colors the sky and clouds with a reddish hue...

Thanks for talking to me Mick. I appreciate your quick and accurate response...  Smile

Terry


User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1668 posts, RR: 61
Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3136 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Terry
The whites are not the best place to detect a cast, that is the mid-tones.
I did a quick play and was very surprised to see how much correction it did actually take.
I use CS2 and added 18 units of cyan (I had guesstimated 5) to correct it .
I do not have time to post my correction here as I am off to work, but try it and you will see
Mick


User currently offlineShep2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 3121 times:

Mick -

Thanks for your time and advise. I will try to make the photo better... but I'm still confused about hazy day photos... haze is sometimes tough, but looks great when captured and processed in a way that looks natural...


User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 6, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3103 times:

Hi terry.
Lovely shots from you as always.
I have had time off from uploading also and i can say that it does one a world of good as it did for me.
But getting back to your shot i can see the red hue more evident in the sky the sun looks high in the sky so late afternoon reddish would not be that strong.
Good luck with them .
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineShep2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3086 times:

Alan -

Thanks for stopping by and talking to me. Where have you been lately? You haven't uploaded in nearly 5 months !!


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © JumboJim747



Great shot above - by the way - when will we see more?

I'm working on the reddish thing - I usually shoot little airplanes on grass - on clear days - pavement and haze is challenging me lately...  Smile


User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5568 posts, RR: 63
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3084 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Terry

Your public and personal apologies were most appreciated. I wish more would do that.

Your comments were not bad at all but I felt a little upset that this came from an ex-screener, one who was well respected within the crew.

Regards

Gary


User currently offlineShep2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3059 times:

Gary-

Thanks for the reply - I have nothing but respect for you and the crew.

We all get cranky - sometimes we bitch and moan about things...

That's life.

Thanks for talking while you stopped by...

Terry


User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 28
Reply 10, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3032 times:

Everyone is frustrated at the moment - I personally will not upload until the dust settles.

My sympathy lies with the screeners, who bear the brunt of the dissatisfaction caused by the incompetence of tthe new owners of the site.

Shep made a handsome apology - bravo.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently onlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3030 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello Terry.

I also would like to applaud you for your thread here. Let's face it, all of us show our human frailties much of the time, many of us on this Forum or in the context of our time on this site  wink . And given the fiasco we have all had to endure recently, those 'achilles heels' are even more exposed. The issue is not making the mistake, it is whether we have the insight to see it for what it is and then how we handle it.

If only more people were big enough to acknowledge they made a mistake or got it wrong more than this site would be better off. Well done to you for having the courage to apologise - particularly publicly. If I were the screener in question I would be sending you a personal email of thanks. Given the beating the screeners get, I am sure the person in question's shoulders are broad enough!

All the best.

Paul


User currently offlineMichlis From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 737 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2937 times:

Kudos to Shep!  bigthumbsup 


If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the outcome of a hundred battles.
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 13, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2839 times:

Quoting Shep2 (Reply 7):
Great shot above - by the way - when will we see more?

Hopefully soon as I'm in the market to get my new camera now that a few drama issues in my life has settled i wont go into details in the forums.

Quoting Shep2 (Reply 7):
I'm working on the reddish thing - I usually shoot little airplanes on grass - on clear days - pavement and haze is challenging me lately...

I had an issue with reddish ting when i realised that it was my in camera settings that was causing it when i changed the settings it sorted the problem out.
Thank you once again for the kind words terry and hope to see more from you soon.
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineZuluLima From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 323 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2787 times:

That's not a reddish hue, there are light clouds back there.


I didn't get a 'Harumph' outta that guy!
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1668 posts, RR: 61
Reply 15, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2763 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting ZuluLima (Reply 14):
That's not a reddish hue, there are light clouds back there

There is actually quite a strong clour cast and the clouds are where it is most evident. I use CS2 and added 18 cyan to get this. I am on a new monitor but edited it yesterday on the old one and am pleased to say that it looks exactly the same.
Note that the pinkness in the sky has mostly gone (though slightly evident to the right for some reason) and the greys such as the cockpit frame, tarmac and nosewheel are perfectly neutral. Neither a pure black nor a pure white should ever show a cast.
I thought that Terry's was a touch bright too so darkened it a little. Looks spot on to me now but I would welcome comments on the brightness of my edit
Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 711 File size: 676kb
Cyan added to remove red cast


Mick Bajcar


User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2237 posts, RR: 48
Reply 16, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2755 times:

Hmm...

Perhaps I get flamed for this, but a press on the 'auto colour' button and some more brightness gave me this:

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 694 File size: 244kb


It's less green than Mick's, and to me it looks better.

Cheers...

Edit: something is not going right here... Does it work now?  boggled 

[Edited 2007-10-20 00:10:03]

User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1668 posts, RR: 61
Reply 17, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2734 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Ed
Flamed ? No, a difference of opinion, that is all  Smile
In my edit look at the clouds to the top left, the fluffy, light-grey ones, and the red has gone. With yours it is still evident.
Either way, both are much closer than Terry's and I think that we would agree that whilst Terry's was a valid rejection, both of our edits, whilst subtly different, would be close enough to be acceptable
Mick


User currently offlineShep2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 2591 times:

Mick and Ed -

Thanks for the tips...

Yall have a great day.


User currently offlineShep2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 2466 times:

And to all others -

Thanks for your comments - thanks for stopping by and talking to me during my time of rejection frustration.

The "reddish hue" photo has been discussed. Mick and Eduard have been kind and given me tips to save this one...

Now, how about the one at the top of my post - rejected as soft and not level... any suggestions?



Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 708 File size: 440kb


User currently offlineShep2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 2451 times:

Maybe the "screener-in-training" is out there and will comment on this one?

Business is slow - so to speak lately... migration of Airliners.net not a big success as of late...

Don't be shy - you can talk of your rejection of this insignificant photo...

Please - talk to me !!!  Smile

Do I have too much time on my hands?  Smile


User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5568 posts, RR: 63
Reply 21, posted (6 years 11 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2384 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Terry

Another point, if you have any questions or problems about images currently in the database please contact the photographer who took the image in the first instance.

Thanks in advance.

Regards

Gary


User currently offlineShep2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (6 years 11 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2204 times:

No point or problem at all...

Small request I asked - was not answered...

Sorry to be bad energy here - I did not intend to be...

Goodbye...


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Question To Screeners (snow) posted Mon Apr 23 2007 15:26:50 by AC773
Explanation + Question To Screeners Update posted Mon Apr 23 2007 10:00:40 by ThierryD
Explanation + Question To Screeners posted Tue Mar 27 2007 10:56:02 by ThierryD
Rejected For Softness + Question To Screeners posted Wed May 17 2006 09:03:17 by Coninpa
My Best Wishes To A.net Crew And Members posted Sun Dec 25 2005 10:30:56 by Ltena
To Screeners: Why Is This Badmotiv? posted Wed Jun 29 2005 22:49:57 by Ltena
An Apology To Screeners posted Sun Jun 26 2005 22:53:53 by Olympus69
I Think My Camera Need To Be Cleaned But How? posted Thu Jun 10 2004 15:47:03 by Dcrusafon
Changing My Email Linked To My Pics?! posted Mon Jun 7 2004 00:23:08 by Andyhunt
I Sent My First Photo To Airliners.net Tonight 757 posted Mon Nov 10 2003 04:42:19 by Jasonwinn