Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Are Nikons Or Canons Sharpest?  
User currently offlineBrakesreleased From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 2 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2337 times:

I have a 350d and even with a 50mm prime or 70-200L lens I find the images a bit soft and need a lot of unsharp mask. I'm after a new camera and tried a 40D and Nikon D80 in Jessops. I took 10 shots outside the shop with each camera and had them printed both straight from the camera and after unsharping in photoshop.
The Nikon D80 images are sharper straight from the camera and require a lot less sharpening in P.S. typically 80 vs 200 for the Canon. The bottom line is that the Nikon D80 pictures looked better than any of the canons (both the originals and sharpened) both in terms of sharpness and colour/colour balance. I've looked at many peoples work on a.net and canon users generally seem to produce soft pictures, although some seem to get it right. Features and lens range are all well and good but the bottom line is I want sharp pictures, is it all in the post processing? Are Nikons sharper than canons or does Nikon just do more sharpening in camera?
Any advice before I make the wrong choice.
Thanks in advance.

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineINNflight From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 3766 posts, RR: 60
Reply 1, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2337 times:

Unless you changed the in-camera sharpening, the camera body has little to do with sharpness. Mainly the lens makes the difference!

There are soft(er) Canon lenses and soft(er) Nikons....Same with any other manufacturer.
It's a bit like comparing a Beech King Air and a Citation X...then you ask why are Cessnas faster in general? Makes little sense  Smile

[Edited 2007-11-07 02:43:47]


Jet Visuals
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2311 times:

Quoting INNflight (Reply 1):
Unless you changed the in-camera sharpening, the camera body has little to do with sharpness. Mainly the lens makes the difference!

{Checkmark}

With a good lens and proper light the shot should be fine with either Canon or Nikon. As a rule I turn off all in camera sharpening and with my prime lens they come out fine.

I would go with the Nikon anyway, not that I am biased.  crazy 


User currently offlineSmAlbany From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 285 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2273 times:

I would say that you don't really want the photos to be overly sharp right out of the camera. You have more flexibility if the shot is unsharpened out of the camera (I normally shoot aviation in RAW) and then sharpen in post processing. That way you can just sharpen the areas that need it and leave the rest alone.

User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1743 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2265 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

There are two kinds of sharpening.

One has to be done by the camera (or your RAW converter) and that's capture sharpening. It removes the softness that anti-aliasing filters introduce into the image. Here you're mostly concerned about microcontrast, or fine details. This is also the kind of sharpness you tend to see in a lens, by the way - the ability to render subtle details.

The second is creative or destination sharpening, when you use USM or Smart Sharpen in Photoshop. This renders acutance, or edge sharpening. You perform this on either your camera's JPEGs or post-converted RAWs.

I just moved up to CS3 from PS7 and the difference in the sharpening tools (especially smart sharpen) is huge. It's like getting a whole new lens.



From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineCalgaryBill From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2257 times:

This same argument came out when Nikon released the D2x. A lot of articles said the 12 megapixel D2x was sharper than Canon's 16 megapixel 1Ds MkII. What most of the reviewers didn't bother checking was that the default sharpening setting on the D2x was just higher!

Like other folks above said, you will have to use comparable quality lenses and settings to get a fair comparison. But it's very likely that both cameras are capable of producing sharp images, just pick the one that you find easiest and most intuitive to use.

B


User currently offlineGuamVICE From Guam, joined Jun 2005, 151 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2241 times:

Quoting CalgaryBill (Reply 5):
it's very likely that both cameras are capable of producing sharp images, just pick the one that you find easiest and most intuitive to use

 checkmark 

No need to reiterate what everyone said...just go with the body that makes you happy  Smile



The two most engaging powers of a photographer are to make new things familiar and to make familiar things new. ~Thacker
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2229 times:

Quoting Brakesreleased (Thread starter):

JPEG or Raw? If JPEG, it's not a fair comparison if you haven't set the in-camera parameters the same.


User currently offlineSoon7x7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2153 times:

To be safe...put the money in your optics,the unfortunate rule of thumb with photography is, the more money you spend, the better the equipment is.Funny thing is I have always been a Nikon person(film), but with digital, I always believed that Canon had a better handle on it,when I went digital I stayed with Nikon a)because Nikon came out with a body w/ CMOS b).I already had Nikon fast/expensive 2.8 lenses. Think is better to use camera defaults and post op images. You can't loose with either choice,but put the $$$$ in the glass. Can buy great used high end 2.8 lenses on line and ebay...j

User currently offlineBrakesreleased From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2085 times:

Thanks everyone, I realise it's not fair to compare straight from the camera JPEGS as settings vary slightly, all I wanted was a few opinions before I went and bought the wrong system. Looks like a 40D a lot of time in front the computer.
Cheers all.
Simon.


User currently offlineAC888YOW From Canada, joined Jan 2005, 531 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1970 times:

Is it not true that Canon's CMOS produces a 'softer' (or maybe 'smoother') image than a Nikon CCD (all other things equal)? I always thought the buttery-smooth appearance was a feature of Canon CMOS-based DSLRs.

User currently offlineSoon7x7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1968 times:

Quoting AC888YOW (Reply 10):

So what is it you are saying, the cmos is actually superior or the ccd, as I am considering d200 vs d300 for a back up camera, 200 is ccd and the 300 is cmos, my current d2x is cmos, I am to understand cmos is flat out better but is the difference actually discernable?..j


User currently offlineAC888YOW From Canada, joined Jan 2005, 531 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1951 times:

Not saying, just asking. I don't know if one is clearly better than the other.

User currently offlineAndrewUber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 40
Reply 13, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1934 times:

Canon guys are going to preach Canon, Nikon guys are going to preach Nikon. It is indeed a matter of personal preference. Both are great equipment. As has been mentioned, your choice of glass has a lot to do with the quality of your images.

Don't spend $1500 on a top-of-the-line camera only to use a $300 lens. Your results will be mediocre at best. It is better to spend $750 on a lower-end DSLR or a used one, and invest in good glass.

Personally, I'm a Canon guy, but as I said - both are impressive. Have a look at both, play with them, get a feel for them and choose whichever one you like!

Drew  wave 



I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
User currently offlineHangarRat From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 633 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1919 times:

Quoting INNflight (Reply 1):
There are soft(er) Canon lenses and soft(er) Nikons

A bunch of questions from a noob to DSLR photography:

I am buying D80 after years of using point and shoot digitals. I know that the D80 is a powerful camera for a beginner, but I feel that it's something I can grow into. I used to shoot Nikon film cameras, so I'm not a total novice.

I am looking at the Nikkor 55-200 zoom AF-S DX ED as my first lens.

Is this a good lens?
Should I spring for VR?

I have a fairly nice suite of manual Nikkor and F-mount lenses including a sweet Tamron 300mm f2.8.

I know they'll mount, but will I be able to use the ttl metering, even in manual mode?
Will I be happy with the results?

I plan to invest in new (to me) glass as my budget allows, but I'd like some pointers on getting started.



Spell check is a false dog
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
So Are Simulators Not Allowed Or What? posted Sun Jun 26 2005 18:23:19 by Newark777
Are You Kidding Or What...? Badmotiv The 2nd posted Wed Jun 22 2005 22:30:48 by Tom3
Are You An Aviation Photographer Or Plane Spotter? posted Thu Dec 11 2003 16:09:48 by Manzoori
Are You A Total Aviation Person - Or Not? posted Fri Oct 26 2001 11:12:24 by AndyEastMids
Are You A Pro...or An Amateur? posted Tue Oct 16 2001 11:53:32 by JetTrader
5 Photos Or Less.....where In The World Are You? posted Wed Aug 29 2001 06:14:51 by SJC-Alien
Are These Pics Good, Or Worthless Trash? posted Fri Aug 17 2001 07:05:16 by Kcle
Are You Left Or Right Eyed? posted Sat Dec 30 2000 13:31:44 by LGW
Again: CW Or CCW? posted Fri Oct 12 2007 12:57:29 by TriStar501
Jessops Are Having A Laugh! posted Sun Oct 7 2007 12:12:55 by EK20