Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Are These Acceptable?  
User currently offlineAirbus340 From Spain, joined Dec 2000, 130 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 9 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2740 times:

Rejection after rejection...I haven't uploaded these as of yet...tired of "loosing" time on attempts. If you click on the small photos (at least from photo nº 2 to nº 5) a bigger one will open. I have them bigger though. Please critique all you can (at least the aircraft ones)...I made them with a Canon 350D (or Rebel XT for Americans and Canadians).
I have a lot of shots more of trips below that "post", so feel free to look at the rest of the blog.

Thanks in advance!  Smile

http://www.andersviking.blogspot.com/

Airbus340

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlipdewaf From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2006, 1568 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (6 years 9 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2726 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

A lot of them look way over sharpened to me but they are also quite big so maybe just reduce the size without so much sharpening. I dont know much about screening but i could see a lot of jaggies.

Fred


User currently offlineDeltaAVL From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1893 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (6 years 9 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2725 times:

Yes, I agree that oversharpening is a large problem in many of these photos. The primary reason probably is your inexperience with editing. Also, in many of the photos from your most recent trip, the aircraft are backlit, which is pretty much an immediate rejection.

It was interesting viewing your blog, as I've just purchased a 350D. Do you have any originals you can post? I can try an edit for you, plus I'd like to see what the Rebel can do!  Smile



"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
User currently offlineAirbus340 From Spain, joined Dec 2000, 130 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2720 times:

I agree that some are "Sharpened" as Canon gives a soft picture, too soft for A.net. I am sure pro's will agree with that.

DeltaAVL, send me your e-mail in a comment-in the blog (I won't post it in the page but it'll arrive to me anyway) -if you want to. I'll send you my original.

Thanks you two for the comments!

Airbus340


User currently offlineDeltaAVL From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1893 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2655 times:

Hi guys,

I've reworked Airbus340's original. Does it stand a chance in the queue?

http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j214/future787pilot/B-HUEwjmossEDIT.jpg

Any comments are greatly appreciated.  Smile



"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
User currently offlineLOCsta From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 306 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2646 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

there are some strange things going on at the edges of the wing and tail....
It looks like you were trying to erase jaggies on a layer with a white background or something?



Missed 4 chasing 1
User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2645 times:



Quoting LOCsta (Reply 5):
there are some strange things going on at the edges of the wing and tail....

Looks like you magic wand tooled it and tried brightening it? Odd looking...

DM


User currently offlineAviatorG From St. Lucia, joined Apr 2005, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2636 times:

Cool blog, I enjoyed it  thumbsup 

Quoting Airbus340 (Thread starter):
:
http://www.andersviking.blogspot.com/

Your Cathay photo (B-HUE) looks great to me. I'm sure if you downsized it to 1024 x 683 (rather than 1600 pixels, which it is now) & cropped the image tighter to the subject, it should have a much better chance of getting into the database. scratchchin 

 checkmark If you use Photoshop CS2/3 (or similar program) to edit, it may also be very helpful to sharpen using the unsharp mask tool. Best of luck, I look foward to seeing it online. optimist 

Quoting DeltaAVL (Reply 4):
I've reworked Airbus340's original. Does it stand a chance in the queue?

Not too likely I'd say. There's no need to "dodge tool" the tail & exhaust ports that much. It looks very unusual to me. The crop is ideal though..  duck  twocents 

cool 


User currently offlineAirbus340 From Spain, joined Dec 2000, 130 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 9 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2591 times:

Delta AVL,

As I said before thanks so much for your hard work...the bad thing is, I don't have photoshop...but I have "The Gimp". Is it possible to edit well with that program?

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 7):
Your Cathay photo (B-HUE) looks great to me. I'm sure if you downsized it to 1024 x 683 (rather than 1600 pixels, which it is now) & cropped the image tighter to the subject, it should have a much better chance of getting into the database. scratchchin

I know that at least I have to crop the images...that is a MUST. About the editing...it still remains a mistery to me on how A.net wants it done. Again...would "The GIMP" do the job?

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 7):
Best of luck, I look foward to seeing it online. optimist

Thanks for the wishes...It will be a millestone IF it does make it there...I've tried so many times...I am just pessimistic about it. Mind you, I never said my shot was a bad one at all. I love my shots and glad to know that other people (that don't have a "mistake-scanning eye") also do. I know that if Pro's want to find a mistake on them, they surely will...but after all, who cares? It's a plane shot that I love and made many more in FRA that day. If A.net won't want them, I'll have them!  Smile


User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1743 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (6 years 9 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2588 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Photoshop CS3 made a huge impact on my acceptance ratio, after years of PS7. Smart Sharpen and the new downsampling algorithms make a huge difference.

Just some food for thought.



From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineAirbus340 From Spain, joined Dec 2000, 130 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (6 years 9 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2587 times:



Quoting Dvincent (Reply 9):
Photoshop CS3 made a huge impact on my acceptance ratio, after years of PS7. Smart Sharpen and the new downsampling algorithms make a huge difference.

Just some food for thought.

How much can it cost? It does sound expensive...  scared 


User currently offlineDeltaAVL From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1893 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (6 years 9 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2579 times:



Quoting Airbus340 (Reply 8):
Delta AVL,

As I said before thanks so much for your hard work...the bad thing is, I don't have photoshop...but I have "The Gimp". Is it possible to edit well with that program?

Hi, sorry I didn't reply to your reply email - I've been terribly busy.  Smile

I know there are some photographers on the boards that do use Gimp, and I'm sure they could provide more insight. As far as I know, Gimp can do many things that Photoshop can do, but there are some restrictions. Others could tell you more about the program, I'm sure.

Quoting LOCsta (Reply 5):
there are some strange things going on at the edges of the wing and tail....
It looks like you were trying to erase jaggies on a layer with a white background or something?



Quoting DM (Reply 6):
Looks like you magic wand tooled it and tried brightening it? Odd looking...



Quoting AviatorG (Reply 7):
Not too likely I'd say. There's no need to "dodge tool" the tail & exhaust ports that much. It looks very unusual to me.

Oh jeez, I didn't even see that after editing. This is what caused it: I used the "lasso" tool to select only the aircraft. I brightened, adjusted colors/contrast/sharpening/levels, and then adjusted the same things in the background, separately. I must not have been careful enough when selecting with the lasso tool.  Sad

I'll give it another try in a few minutes.



"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1743 posts, RR: 11
Reply 12, posted (6 years 9 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2575 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Airbus340 (Reply 10):
How much can it cost? It does sound expensive...

Very spendy unfortunately. But I got upgrade price so it was much less.

Considering I tend to buy one copy of Photoshop every four years... it evens out over time.

My real problem in the past was bad downrezzing. Adobe Lightroom does a terrible job and PS7 wasn't much better. Exporting fullsize to PS CS3 and downsampling there even with normal bicubic preserves details much better and leaves less artifacts. Check it out. Note that neither of these images have any Photoshop sharpening applied.

http://homepage.mac.com/kefkafloyd/.Pictures/daigp_lr.jpg (exported at finished size in Lightroom, edited in PS7, and rejected for oversharpened)

http://homepage.mac.com/kefkafloyd/.Pictures/daigp_cs3.jpg (exported full size from Lightroom, downsized in photoshop CS3, eventua)

Look inside the stabilizer. You can clearly see artifacts introduced from LR's export to TIFF (which I would then selectively sharpen in PS). CS3 has none of these. I was essentially working behind the eight-ball for many months until I realized this was going on (it's very, very obvious on high contrast LCD monitors, not so obvious on tubes).

This is just a quick example of making sure your programs aren't hindering your work.



From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineDeltaAVL From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1893 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (6 years 9 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2559 times:

Quoting DeltaAVL (Reply 11):

I'll give it another try in a few minutes.

Here's my new edit. I got rid of the halo-looking things and got rid of the slight overexposure on the 747 fuselage. This time I think it might have a chance at the database. Opinions?

http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j214/future787pilot/B-HUEwjmossEDIT2.jpg


Airbus340, I'm so happy to help you with this, and you should know that I'm thoroughly enjoying working with this photo! Basically, what I did with this picture was:
  1. Crop the photo to A.net standards.
  2. Resized the photo to 1024 px wide.
  3. Adjusted contrast, color, sharpening, and levels on the 747. I selected just the 747 using the lasso and magic wand tools.
  4. Adjusted contrast, color, and levels on the background. I didn't bother with sharpening because it doesn't matter if the backgound's soft or not. I selected just the background using the same methods as used on the 747.
I'd just start playing around with Gimp, and start tweaking some of your photos. Just get the feel of the program. As said above, Photoshop is better (I'm using Photoshop CS), but you can certainly get acceptable results from such programs as Gimp.

Hope this helps!

[Edited 2007-11-30 17:38:28]


"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
User currently offlineAirbus340 From Spain, joined Dec 2000, 130 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (6 years 9 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2533 times:

Thanks Dvincent for your explanations and examples!

Delta AVL, You are amazing! look at that! a perfect picture -I must say much better now!- Thank so much for your tutorial on how you did it! You bet it helps.  Smile

If you want to (you don't have to "bother" any more as I imagine you are a very busy man), but if you do, I can send you more shots of last Saturday when I was in FRA.

Quoting AviatorG (Reply 7):
Cool blog, I enjoyed it thumbsup

Thanks!, I'm glad you did...!


User currently offlineDeltaAVL From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1893 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (6 years 9 months 1 day ago) and read 2487 times:



Quoting DeltaAVL (Reply 15):

Just bumping this thread to the top since it wasn't automatically bumped after my previous reply.  Yeah sure



"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
User currently offlineAirbus340 From Spain, joined Dec 2000, 130 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (6 years 9 months 15 hours ago) and read 2449 times:



Quoting DeltaAVL (Reply 16):
Quoting DeltaAVL (Reply 15):

Just bumping this thread to the top since it wasn't automatically bumped after my previous reply. Yeah sure

Haha...that's funny...

OK I'll send you the EK one...but I have like 15 of them...I guess I'll send you small ones to see witch one you like best...

Cheers!

Airbus340


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Are These Shots Acceptable? posted Sun Sep 24 2006 23:17:11 by Ranger703
Are These Two Worth Uploading? posted Wed Nov 21 2007 23:23:04 by KLM772ER
How Are These? posted Sat Sep 29 2007 04:46:00 by Thetford569
Just How Bad Are These Two Pictures? posted Thu Jul 19 2007 01:22:19 by N62NA
Are These 2 Good Enough? posted Sat Jun 23 2007 19:47:59 by LHRjc
Are These Good Enough? posted Tue Jun 19 2007 15:49:42 by Ilikeflight
How Are These Fpr My Fist Real Shots. posted Sat Apr 21 2007 21:34:24 by FLLspoter
How Are These Shots? posted Sat Apr 21 2007 08:58:48 by Monteycarlos
How Are These Pics posted Sat Apr 14 2007 05:40:13 by Ilikeflight
Are These Good Enough To Upload? posted Sat Apr 7 2007 07:58:17 by DL777LAX