Walter2222 From Belgium, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 1299 posts, RR: 27
Reply 2, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2330 times:
Thanks for the feedback! I will pull it then before it gets screened (still a couple of days to go , so I can still leave it here for anyone to read this thread...).
PS: I agree, that the level looks odd, because of the pole with the windsock (which is not a perfect vertical...), but I aligned it with some other verticals on the part of the picture that is now cropped out...
Lanas From Argentina, joined Aug 2006, 978 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2321 times:
The angle is not that different, so as to avoid the double rejection, IMO. Maybe if it were shot from the back or a 90º angle it could have made that difference.
Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 1): level looks way off to me on the queued image too....look at the pole of the windsock
Hi Mick, I thought that windsocks may give an idea of the level of the pic, but are they that reliable as a vertical reference? I´ve always been careful with these poles, because if they´re subject to strong winds, they may not be perfectly vertical in the end.
"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien