UA935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6 Posted (6 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2622 times:
Yep, title says it all.
The info doesn't match the photo, once again.
I give up posting in site related, no one seems to give a F*** over there. Excusive the expleative but this site goes from bad to worse with no comment from the owners.
A friend of mine Steve Flint had an image acepted today of a Qf 744, info is for an IB A319, furthermore it is one bad ass shot, 300 F2.8 with 1.4x and 2 x converters stacked + the crop factor thats a whole 1092mm Baby!
Some may say that when Johan had the site it was slow etc but I have never known so many issues with info/images/soft rejections.
Edit:- I have just clicked on trhe view image LARGE option and it comes up with a completly different image to the info and image!
Dlednicer From United States of America, joined May 2005, 539 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (6 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2607 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW DATABASE EDITOR
Quoting UA935 (Thread starter): I give up posting in site related, no one seems to give a F*** over there. Excusive the expleative but this site goes from bad to worse with no comment from the owners.
Part of the reason that you haven't seen any response is that the crew is working very hard on fixing this and don't have the time to go trolling for comments. The code supporting the site has been described as a "Winchester House", in reference to the famous house of that name in California - additions added to additions... DM is working very hard on getting the bugs out and at the same time making the code more supportable. This can't be fixed with the click of one's fingers.
Instead of letting your imagination provide a conclusion that people don't care, let your imigination provide you a picture of people frantically working on code trying to fix things. That is the reality.
Mr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2787 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (6 years 7 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2466 times:
I posted about a wrong info problem in the Site Related Forum over 10 hours ago & nobody has replied to me. But I do have a question to ask below in here ........
My photo with the wrong info has another problem too ( it's photo ID # 1304527), in my case the pixel dimensions of my shot have been changed .... thus it looks like garbage!
I uploaded it at 1024 x 683 (at a 3:2 ratio) and it's now stretched out at 1200 X 798 (Another bug to be squished!).
My photo is of a Cessna 185 (C-GKRC) on floats at Val d' Or, Quebec on Oct 3 2007 during rainy conditions.
It's being shown as a Caravelle III in Caracas, Venezuela from 1966 .... the year I was born!
Quoting Dlednicer (Reply 2): Part of the reason that you haven't seen any response is that the crew is working very hard on fixing this and don't have the time to go trolling for comments.
Quoting Dlednicer (Reply 2): Instead of letting your imagination provide a conclusion that people don't care, let your imigination provide you a picture of people frantically working on code trying to fix things. That is the reality.
>> Dlednicer, I understand the bug is being worked on & that the crew is too busy to reply to the forums, so I'm glad that you have taken the time to reply to this forum because it is a frustrating feeling when you don't get any feedback from the crew or anyone after your photo has been getting viewed for 10 hours while its info is wrong & its pixel dimensions are screwed up.
I hope this bug is fixed while my photo is being viewed so that it looks better & people get to read about its info & my remarks.
BUT, what happens if it doesn't get fixed before its viewing it done in the lastest 24-48 hour section???
When it's pulled from the latest uploads viewing, where will it go? Will it be in the category of Caravelle III's & under the wrong photographer's name?
This other photographer appears to have his first photo on Anet, but it's my shot. His name is David john allen & I bet he's pretty confused right now.