Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Apple Aperture - Workflow?  
User currently offlineSyncmaster From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 2039 posts, RR: 10
Posted (7 years 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4085 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I've had Apple's Aperture software for quite a while now (since about a month after it came out), and while I have organized all my photos perfectly in my library I still have yet to figure out a decent workflow for developing my photos. I realize it is not a replacement for Photoshop by any means, and I still have Photoshop (CS3 Extended).

Does any one have any recommendations or experiences?

-Charlie  wave 

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1753 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 4058 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Probably the same way I use lightroom. Do your tonal/color edits/noise reduction/input sharpening in aperture, then export to Photoshop to do selective sharpening, then use Save for Web from PS.


From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlinePsyops From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4042 times:

Aperture is great for intake and initial screening, but it lacks the ability to selectively sharpen. You would have to sharpen the entire image.

In my experience, next to useless for av photos to be uploaded here.

However, I use it for almost all my sports photos and other assignments. Can intake large quantities and then use the ratings features to reject and rate photos for further work. I can go through 500 shots from a sports event and export 50 jpegs edited ready to go in a couple hours.


User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1753 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4038 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Psyops (Reply 2):
In my experience, next to useless for av photos to be uploaded here.

The kind of sharpening that Aperture does is the same kind of sharpening used in Lightroom or Adobe Camera RAW. It's input sharpening designed to reduce bayer mosaic artifacts and gaussian blurs from antialiasing filters. Some of this has to be done regardless of output or selective sharpening. You don't really want to selectively do input sharpening because that sort of stuff affects the whole image at its full, original size. It's the same with almost any RAW converter (even ACR or Bridge, even though you just drag it in to PS after the fact).

You just export the frames you want to PS and selectively sharpen them in there at your final size. Two different tools that work overall on the image.



From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlinePsyops From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 4 days ago) and read 4021 times:



Quoting Dvincent (Reply 3):
You just export the frames you want to PS and selectively sharpen them in there at your final size.

Like I said useless for photos here unless used with another tool.


User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1753 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 4015 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Psyops (Reply 4):
Like I said useless for photos here unless used with another tool.

All RAW converters are like this though. So I don't really see it as a strike against Aperture or Lightroom or those kinds of programs. This applies to Nikon Capture, CaptureOne, Bridge, Lightroom, Rawshooter, ACR, Aperture... they all require PS or something else. The fact that ACR or Bridge can automatically send it to PS or can be called from PS is moot; they themselves can't handle it - you still need PS in the end. They're two different tools for two different purposes. Use Aperture/Lightroom to convert your RAWs and organize them and do the major tonal/color edits, and PS to selectively sharpen the frames you want. It's not meant to replace PS, it complements it.

[Edited 2007-12-19 14:10:37]


From the Mind of Minolta
User currently onlineJRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4723 posts, RR: 50
Reply 6, posted (7 years 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 4005 times:



Quoting Psyops (Reply 4):
Like I said useless for photos here unless used with another tool.

that's a lot more positive already.

On the other hand, I would hardly call Lightroom and Aperture nest to useless for photo's for this website. I do everything in LR except for sharpening which I do in PS. It has sped up my workflow tremendously and it is so extremely powerfull. Editing while selecting, just browsing trough them, I love it.



For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
User currently offlineSyncmaster From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 2039 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (6 years 12 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3964 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks for all the input everyone. This is what I was looking for, I basically need to treat Aperture like I would CaptureOne when I used it, basic tonal correction, input sharpening, and noise reduction. Leaving the rest to Photoshop. This is a change from what I was trying to do with Aperture in making it an "all-in-one" tool for developing my RAW images.

Thanks again for the help!

-Charlie


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Apple's Aperture... posted Mon Oct 24 2005 13:42:24 by Chris78cpr
Pre-screening To Check New Workflow posted Fri Dec 14 2007 00:33:34 by ANITIX87
Aperture Priority Vs Shutter Priority posted Tue May 15 2007 19:19:10 by EK20
RAW Workflow With Lightroom And Elements? posted Thu Mar 22 2007 18:37:36 by Jetfan
Any Mac Users Edit With Aperture? posted Mon Feb 5 2007 07:29:23 by Flynavy
Opinions On Quality After Revised Workflow posted Tue Dec 12 2006 09:22:09 by LOCsta
Screen For Editing (apple Cinema Display) posted Sun Nov 19 2006 19:11:14 by DRAIGONAIR
Masterclass: JPG And Raw Workflow posted Thu Nov 9 2006 00:08:24 by Beechcraft
New Workflow, Quality Check Requested. posted Thu Aug 10 2006 16:47:37 by D L X
Should I Use A High Aperture Or A Big Shutter Spee posted Wed Jul 26 2006 14:25:09 by Viv