Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Bad Processing?  
User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 9 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1058 times:

When I get some of my slides back from the lab, they have black "splotches" all over them, it can be cleaned in ps, but they also scan really badly, alot of noise and way too contrasty, they seem overexposed on the whites, but underexposed in the shadows. I nearly always use Sensia 100, and some films turn out just great without a spot on them, no problem scanning, but about 25% of my films are bad like this. Some slides even have long scratches across them. Is this due to bad processing or bad film??
Anyone experienced the same??

Thanks,

Staffan

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineThomasphoto60 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3923 posts, RR: 23
Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1017 times:

Sounds like some one dipped your film ito some old soup (chemicals) as well as just poor processing.

Run don't walk from this lab!

Thomas



"Show me the Braniffs"
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1004 times:

Yeah i had exactly the same problem, i found alot of odd noise around the nose and wingtips around the aircraft that weren't caused by the camera/film.

And these were my A346/Beluga shots!


User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 9 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 999 times:

My guess is that the chemicals are old or something...

User currently offlineLewis From Greece, joined Jul 1999, 3623 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (12 years 9 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 967 times:

I developed a film at a Boots drugstore in London and the pics were crappy. Thank god there were not any aviation pics on the roll. It seems that they digitalise the photo before printing and it was like having noise and small pixels.

User currently offlineLugonza_2001 From Spain, joined Oct 2001, 315 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (12 years 9 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 936 times:

Hi!!! two days ago i developed a roll in a Carrefour center, the results were terrible, i even thought my lens was damaged!!! i went to a special photo shop, and they told me that, although the roll i used was not really good (Carrefour 100 print, never again), the problem was when they proccessed the film; i got most of the pictures with white scratches, ahh!!!!!!!!

Regards


User currently offlineDSMav8r From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 579 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (12 years 9 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 926 times:

Isn't it tough to find a good E6 lab!? I have had countless rolls ruined by poor processing, usually by old chemicals and poor handling. Mine were mostly plagued by the dreaded old chemical red-casting and/or streaked from improper drying. Luckily the streaks can can be cleaned, those suckers are PRIME breeding ground for fungus growth if they are not.

Fortunately, I finally found a lab that consistantly does a good job, but it took some searching.

Aric Thalman
Omaha, USA




To most people, the sky is the limit. To those who love aviation, the sky is home
User currently offlineYKA From Netherlands, joined Sep 2001, 766 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 9 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 909 times:

I've had nothing but excelent results with E-6 processing right here in town. Unlike the mail-in labs that take weeks I get my slides back in 2 or 3 days. My adice to you is to find a proffesional photo studio in town and ask if they have E6 processing.

User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (12 years 9 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 902 times:

I've tried a new lab, will get my slides after the weekend.

Hope they do a better job.

Staffan


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photoshop And Processing RAW Formats posted Sun Jan 28 2007 08:16:31 by Monteycarlos
Color Settings For Post-processing Software. posted Mon Jan 1 2007 20:29:06 by Avsfan
Is This Bad Double? posted Sun Dec 31 2006 14:48:44 by Myt332
Bad Choice Of Camera... posted Sat Dec 30 2006 14:19:00 by Gary2880
Bad Motive, Now Acceptable? posted Fri Dec 15 2006 06:22:33 by UnattendedBag
Bad Motive? posted Wed Dec 6 2006 19:15:19 by Acontador
The Story Of My Life.... Bad Contrast posted Sat Dec 2 2006 16:03:41 by Chachu201
Some Tips On This Bad Centered Pics posted Fri Dec 1 2006 01:30:14 by Lanas
Bad Editing? posted Thu Nov 30 2006 21:59:29 by 777MechSys