WakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1288 posts, RR: 18 Reply 2, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1063 times:
Psych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 2968 posts, RR: 60 Reply 4, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1035 times:
You need to pull this one from the queue Jeff - it is an immediate rejection. Nowhere does it appear sharp to me eye. The blur is very apparent and also there looks to be some editing artifacts - for example, around the registration.
Silver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4538 posts, RR: 28 Reply 5, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1035 times:
It looks to me like the image suffers from a lot of jpeg compression. There is something screwy with the image especially around the front windshield, the underside and around the reg.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
Dvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1719 posts, RR: 12 Reply 8, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 966 times:
Jeff:
You could have sensor ghosting going on that is reducing the sharpness of your image. I too would like to see a high-res or 100% crop of an area to get a better view.
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 53 Reply 9, posted (5 years 4 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 947 times:
Thanks for the replies, I'll pull it. No noise reduction was used, I just liked the effect of it being lit against the dark green backdrop. A reminder not to edit with tired eyes.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, 
From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 2968 posts, 
From Germany, joined May 2005, 398 posts, 
From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
