Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Nikon D300: Shooting Tips?  
User currently offlineSkyhawkmatthew From Australia, joined Oct 2005, 153 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 11185 times:

Hi,

I just got a Nikon D300 with an 18-200 VR lens and I am flying to Tokyo/Sapporo in a few days. Does anyone have any tips on how to get the best shots with this combination (mode, settings, etc)? Also, what are the best spots in Terminal 2 (Where QF is) in Narita, and JL terminals in Haneda and Sapporo?

Thanks,

Matt  airplane 


Qantas - The Spirit of Australia.
30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 11163 times:

Can't give you any advice on spots at the airport, but I would read the manual on the plane on the way over. You shouldn't be expecing great photos with little or no knowledge on a DSLR or basic photographic rules. The manual that comes with the camera is the best start.

User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 2, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 11151 times:

Step 1:

Get some understanding of the basics of exposure - shutter speed, aperture, sensor sensitivity (ISO), colour temperature (white balance), exposure compensation, and how all these things interact with each other; of composition - framing, angle of view, lens choice; of post-processing - cropping, selective sharpening, correction of exposure. Three books by Ansel Adams - "The Negative", "The Print" and "The Camera", are a good source of accurate information.

Step 2:

Read the camera manual.

Step 3:

Set yourself some specific test assignments. Analyse the results, identify your mistakes, do not make those mistakes the next time.

Do not expect great results quickly. If you stick with photography, you will still be learning and improving in 20 years' time.

You have a great camera and a reasonably good lens. But, like any tools, they will only give great results if you know what you are doing, and why you are doing it.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineSkyhawkmatthew From Australia, joined Oct 2005, 153 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 11109 times:

I have been into photography for a while and upgraded from an Olympus SP-510 to the SLR... I have read the manual already and have got some great shots of non-aviation subjects but haven't got to the airport yet!


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Matthew Baker


One of my shots taken with a C-770 before it was drowned  Sad

Thanks for the replies,

Matt  airplane 



Qantas - The Spirit of Australia.
User currently offlineSkyhawkmatthew From Australia, joined Oct 2005, 153 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 10987 times:

I'm in Japan now, I took some shots with the camera in SYD and HND... Do you think any of these shots are good for upload with some more processing?
Shot 1
Shot 2
Shot 3
Shot 4
Shot 5
Shot 6
Shot 7
Shot 8
Shot 9
Shot 10

Thanks
Matt  airplane 



Qantas - The Spirit of Australia.
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 10983 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Take the 18-200 lens and throw it as far as you can. The further the better.

This lens is best used in bright sunshine at f/8. It is an extremely soft lens. I'm not saying you can't use it but you need to be on top of your game to get consistent results.

You wanna reach out to 200mm pick up an 80-200 f/2.8 Nikon or Sigma. You can't go wrong.


User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 10970 times:

In your current batch I only see one that is a possibility (shot 2).

I think your main problem is you are shooting on a really bad day. It's not ideal. Go and do something else when its like that. Especially when starting out with a DSLR.


User currently offlineCpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 38
Reply 7, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 10959 times:

I think 2 is a possibility with some editing.

May I ask, did you take that one from the observation deck above the International Terminal at Sydney? I was under the impression it was closed...


User currently offlineSkyhawkmatthew From Australia, joined Oct 2005, 153 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 10958 times:



Quoting Eadster (Reply 6):
I think your main problem is you are shooting on a really bad day

Yes, I was transiting Haneda en route to Sapporo and it was raining... took a few shots in the terminal waiting for the JL flight.
I have submitted at the moment This photo and shot 10 above.
Thanks for the input!
Matt  airplane 



Qantas - The Spirit of Australia.
User currently offlineSkyhawkmatthew From Australia, joined Oct 2005, 153 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 10956 times:



Quoting Cpd (Reply 7):
did you take that one from the observation deck above the International Terminal at Sydney?

Yes

Quoting Cpd (Reply 7):
I was under the impression it was closed...

Don't think it's ever been closed... the bar up there has been closed for a while though.

The spotting deck at HND is much better - but no roof! (it was raining when I was there - I'll hope for better on the way home)



Qantas - The Spirit of Australia.
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 10, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 10934 times:



Quoting 777MechSys (Reply 5):
Take the 18-200 lens and throw it as far as you can.

It's not all that bad - I have literally dozens of shots taken with that lens and accepted here.

Here's just one random example:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vivion Mulcahy




Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 10926 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Viv (Reply 10):
It's not all that bad - I have literally dozens of shots taken with that lens and accepted here

I'm glad you read my post and paid attention.  sarcastic 

Quoting 777MechSys (Reply 5):
This lens is best used in bright sunshine at f/8. It is an extremely soft lens. I'm not saying you can't use it but you need to be on top of your game to get consistent results.

I never said you can't get good results. I have a bunch too, but I'm not here to shamelessly plug my shots.


User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 10922 times:



Quoting 777MechSys (Reply 5):
You wanna reach out to 200mm pick up an 80-200 f/2.8 Nikon or Sigma. You can't go wrong.

No doubt, my 80-200 2.8 Nikkor is my #1 lens.

Quoting Viv (Reply 10):
It's not all that bad - I have literally dozens of shots taken with that lens and accepted here.

Nice shot, but trying to shoot moving aircraft it less than ideal conditions the lens is impossible, for good results a faster lens is much better.

Quoting Viv (Reply 2):
Three books by Ansel Adams - "The Negative", "The Print" and "The Camera", are a good source of accurate information.

I own both and they are the best! The man was a genius.


User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 13, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 10921 times:

Quoting 777MechSys (Reply 11):
I'm not here to shamelessly plug my shots.

I have no shame. Why on earth should I?

By the way, you seem to believe the old wive's tale about f/8 or nothing - it really amuses me when people spend big bucks on fast glass and then shoot at f/.8. I have a bunch of shots here, taken with the 18-200 lens at f/4 and f/5.6 and others taken at f/16. As you say, when one is on top of one's game ....

[Edited 2008-01-15 08:34:40]


Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 14, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 10919 times:



Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 12):
trying to shoot moving aircraft it less than ideal conditions the lens is impossible

Impossible??? Not at all!



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 10914 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Viv (Reply 13):
By the way, you seem to believe the old wive's tale about f/8 or nothing - it really amuses me when people spend big bucks on fast glass and then shoot at f/.8.

That is not what I said.

Quoting 777MechSys (Reply 5):
This lens is best used in bright sunshine at f/8

Note the part "This lens..." in reference to the 18-200. f/5.6 on this lens is noticeably softer. Actually, it is horribly soft.

I never said one word about the 80-200 f/2.8 and only good at f/8. You took a specific statement and applied it everywhere you pleased.  no 


User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 16, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 10909 times:



Quoting 777MechSys (Reply 5):
Take the 18-200 lens and throw it as far as you can. The further the better.

This lens is best used in bright sunshine at f/8.

I was also referring to the 18-200. I said not one word about the 80-200 2.8.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 10906 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Viv (Reply 13):
you seem to believe the old wive's tale about f/8 or nothing - it really amuses me when people spend big bucks on fast glass and then shoot at f/.8

ummm the 18-200 is what you call fast glass?


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9628 posts, RR: 68
Reply 18, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 10903 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER



Quoting 777MechSys (Reply 17):
ummm the 18-200 is what you call fast glass?

it is fast. As in I sold it, fast.

If you have anything but a Japan-build 18-200 it won't live up to the hype.

Thing is so soft around the edges not even Viagra could help it.


User currently offlinePsyops From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 10875 times:

The 18-200 is a great travel lens, wonderful for general photography because of its wide range of focal length. On a D300 with the higher iso capability it would also do well in lower light situations where you would need 2.8 glass.

It is however, very skittish in terms of sharpness. Some copies are better than others, but generally not what would be considered a lens to use when you want to ensure high quality.

Viv - I can accept you have got great shots with it. I think the point being made is that the lens can be hit or miss and there are better choices for purely aviation related photography. Everyone one has their own opinions, I would personally weigh in on the side of using the 18-200 for snapshots.

Pete


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9628 posts, RR: 68
Reply 20, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 10873 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER



Quoting Psyops (Reply 19):
I would personally weigh in on the side of using the 18-200 for snapshots.

Whatever, dude.

Don't let me catch you leaving your 'Tube N Squirt' by the pool or I will pop it



User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 10864 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 20):
Don't let me catch you leaving your 'Tube N Squirt' by the pool or I will pop it

This also includes your 'Floaties' too!



User currently offlinePsyops From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 10861 times:



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 20):
Whatever, dude.

Snapshots - like the kind you would take with a point 'n shoot.

I rarely use my 18-200.


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9628 posts, RR: 68
Reply 23, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 10856 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER



Quoting Psyops (Reply 22):
Snapshots - like the kind you would take with a point 'n shoot.

What lens was this shot?



User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 24, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 10849 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 23):
What lens was this shot?

I'm gonna guess fast glass. 17-55 f/2.8? Just a guess though given that you don't waste a D2XS on an 18-200 lens.


25 NIKV69 : Bad choice of words, your right. Though a 2.8 is much better at it. Nicely put.
26 Viv : That is what I have.
27 Viv : No, I did not say that. Read my post again - I made a generic comment about people who buy fast glass and shoot at f/8. The 80-200 2.8 is a wonderful
28 Psyops : Right on - and out at the wide end to get everything in.
29 777MechSys : What? Wide angle to make sure you get all of Royal? Dude, that is harsh.
30 Clickhappy : That's what Erick's sister always says. Weird.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Best Shooting Tips posted Wed Jun 29 2005 01:46:28 by FlyFloats
Need Houston (IAH) Shooting Tips posted Fri Nov 2 2001 23:31:13 by Brick
Nikon D40...good For Aviation Shooting? posted Mon Nov 26 2007 19:08:08 by JetSetter629
Shooting An Airshow Soon...Any Tips? posted Mon Nov 7 2005 22:06:58 by BaylorAirBear
Tips Needed For Shooting Out A Helicopter, Please posted Tue Oct 25 2005 11:49:01 by Fergulmcc
Nikon D50? Which Lens? Any Tips/Advice? posted Thu Aug 25 2005 07:14:42 by Ipilot777
Question About Canon D300 And Nikon D70 posted Sat Apr 16 2005 22:59:02 by TACAA320
Tips For Action Shots Using Nikon Coolpix 995? posted Tue Aug 13 2002 22:04:23 by Ryefly
Tips For Bad Weather Shooting posted Sat Jan 27 2001 10:42:34 by Aer Lingus
SXM Spotting Question/Tips posted Fri Jan 4 2008 09:45:52 by NWA783
All The Basic Shooting Tips In One Thread posted Wed Oct 20 2010 16:53:58 by captain777
Olympus E410 - Shooting Tips posted Thu Jan 10 2008 13:54:20 by Carak18
Nikon D300 New Owners,beware... posted Tue Dec 11 2007 11:20:31 by Soon7x7
Best Shooting Tips posted Wed Jun 29 2005 01:46:28 by FlyFloats
Need Houston (IAH) Shooting Tips posted Fri Nov 2 2001 23:31:13 by Brick
Shooting In Humidity (+ Tips For Thai Airports) posted Mon Sep 28 2009 08:43:23 by JakTrax
Nikon D90 Vs D300 posted Sat Nov 22 2008 20:24:08 by 744flyer
Nikon D40...good For Aviation Shooting? posted Mon Nov 26 2007 19:08:08 by JetSetter629
Shooting An Airshow Soon...Any Tips? posted Mon Nov 7 2005 22:06:58 by BaylorAirBear
Tips Needed For Shooting Out A Helicopter, Please posted Tue Oct 25 2005 11:49:01 by Fergulmcc