Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Let's Revive The Monitor Discussion!  
User currently offlineUSAir_757 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 996 posts, RR: 8
Posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2332 times:

OK. Basically, right now I have the same computer I had in 2001. Sony Vaio PCV-RX660, came with a 15" LCD. The computer itself is great - aside from an HDD failure (YAY MAXTOR!), it's been trouble-free for 7 years and still serves me quite well. Now - while the LCD is great for general computing, I have determined that LCDs (or at least all but the very most expensive models, which I cannot currently afford) are inferior for the purpose of photo post processing, and since it looks like I'm going to be going back into this head-first very soon, I've gotta get things in order.

I'm going for a large flat CRT (19"+). They've gotten VERY cheap lately, and with everyone being in love with LCDs, there is a deluge of perfectly good CRTs on the 2nd hand market. I've even found good ones in thrift stores, unfortunately before I was specifically in the market for one again.

I need some recommendations.

I'm pretty certain the older Dell flat CRTs were actually rebadged Sony monitors, due to the name "Trinitron" being printed on them which is in fact a Sony registered trademark.

Anyways, thanks in advance, guys.

[Edited 2008-01-14 04:49:03]


-Cullen Wassell @ MLI | Pentax K5 + DA18-55WR + Sigma 70-300 DL Macro Super
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1742 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2313 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Your old LCD stinks at photo processing, but newer LCDs are much better, even the ones that aren't that expensive. You want to avoid so-called "TN" panels because they have a lower bit depth.

I still use a tube monitor but only because I'm too broke right now to rush out and buy a new LCD when frankly, I need to.

I would suggest looking at the newer Dell flat panel monitors; they are very good and use Samsung panels which are high quality. They're also the same monitors screeners use.  Wink



From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineUSAir_757 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 996 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2305 times:

The main thing I'm concerned about here is contrast shift. CRTs are inherently immune to it, but I've yet to see an LCD - still - that doesn't do it to some degree.

LCDs are also still have difficulty producing true blacks; CRTs can do it effortlessly.

To each his own, I guess?

Either way, I'll take another look at some new LCDs, but I personally still see CRTs as superior for photo processing. LCDs are seriously still in their infancy when compared with the CRT which has been with us for, what, going on 70 years now?

Thanks for the advice nonetheless.

-C

[Edited 2008-01-14 06:09:13]


-Cullen Wassell @ MLI | Pentax K5 + DA18-55WR + Sigma 70-300 DL Macro Super
User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1742 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2294 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting USAir_757 (Reply 2):
Either way, I'll take another look at some new LCDs, but I personally still see CRTs as superior for photo processing. LCDs are seriously still in their infancy when compared with the CRT which has been with us for, what, going on 80 years now?

The problem is that the tube monitor is a dying breed. I agree with your points, but even the print industry is moving towards flat panels (most printers I know use flat panels in their color critical work nowadays). Today's panels are extremely good.

Tubes also very heavy and consume a lot of electricity. Flat panels also help save your eyes.



From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineDazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2887 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2282 times:

I have a 17" CRT on my main pc (used for editing photo's etc) and an LCD on my work pc. For me, CRT's are far superior in overall quality. I just hope my monitor lasts for a good few years yet becasue I'd hate to have to replace it with an LCD. They do nothing for me.

Darren



Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineUSAir_757 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 996 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2282 times:

I agree that it's a dying breed, no question there - nobody in town, save one or two of the computer places, even sells new CRTs anymore - whether we're talking TVs or monitors.

I can't see how this is a problem, though - enlighten me? All I can see it meaning, right now, is that I can get a really nice barely used monitor for disgustingly cheap... (which would free up that money for more photo gear...like the upcoming SMC Pentax-DA* 60-250!! )

Thanks again

-C

[Edited 2008-01-14 06:44:33]


-Cullen Wassell @ MLI | Pentax K5 + DA18-55WR + Sigma 70-300 DL Macro Super
User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1742 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2274 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting USAir_757 (Reply 5):
I can't see how this is a problem, though - enlighten me? All I can see it meaning, right now, is that I can get a really nice barely used monitor for disgustingly cheap... (which would free up that money for more photo gear...like the upcoming SMC Pentax-DA* 60-250!! )

Like I said, I still use a tube... My LaCie electron blue. Great monitor, but it's not perfect. If you can get a good monitor for a low price, then why not? Just make sure it works and doesn't have a lot of phosphor wear...

And then get an EyeOne and calibrate it.  Wink



From the Mind of Minolta
User currently offlineUSAir_757 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 996 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2242 times:

Yeah, that's the plan.

Plus, it'd be interesting to give LCDs a couple more years to develop and then see how they square up.

-C



-Cullen Wassell @ MLI | Pentax K5 + DA18-55WR + Sigma 70-300 DL Macro Super
User currently offlineSpoogle From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2210 times:



Quoting Dazbo5 (Reply 4):
I have a 17" CRT on my main pc (used for editing photo's etc) and an LCD on my work pc. For me, CRT's are far superior in overall quality. I just hope my monitor lasts for a good few years yet becasue I'd hate to have to replace it with an LCD. They do nothing for me

Bingo .... my thoughts exactly , i use a Dell 17" CRT and will NOT be replacing it any time soon .

regards


User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 9, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2191 times:



Quoting Dazbo5 (Reply 4):
I have a 17" CRT on my main pc (used for editing photo's etc) and an LCD on my work pc. For me, CRT's are far superior in overall quality. I just hope my monitor lasts for a good few years yet becasue I'd hate to have to replace it with an LCD. They do nothing for me.

I have to agree there too, mine's a 19" Dell CRT and I love it. The quality of the photos on it are brilliant. I use a very cheap TFT to keep all my PS tools on so that leaves my CRT free from clutter. I can view the whole photo on my CRT.

I am a member of a photographic society and one of the members is an Editor of a photographic magazine, and he's been asked the same question so many times about what monitor should they buy. His answer is simple. You get what you pay for. You want quality then be prepared to pay for it!

Take care

Fergul  sun 



Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4770 posts, RR: 26
Reply 10, posted (6 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2186 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have a 19" NEC MultiSync LCD 1970GX. I have had it for 2 years and I absolutely love it! It is perfect for multimedia. Photo editing, video/movie watching. The colors are so vibrant, has excellent contrast ratio etc. Blacks are bacl and whites are white. The surface of the screen has a little bit of gloss to it that I think really adds to the presentation it gives with no problem with reflections or anything.


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Does The Monitor Calibration Tool Work? posted Sat Mar 4 2006 16:19:03 by Cadet57
Let's Get The Queue Down - Limit Uploads Even More posted Mon Feb 20 2006 09:36:38 by 9VSPO
Get Close To The Monitor... posted Tue Sep 6 2005 19:24:16 by LIPH
How To Tell If The Monitor Is Correct? posted Wed Aug 10 2005 11:31:15 by DC10Tim
Let's Play Spot The Flaws! (Advice On A Reedit) posted Thu Apr 27 2006 06:26:15 by D L X
Will You Let The London Bomb Effect You! posted Fri Jul 8 2005 10:58:04 by LHRSIMON
Anyone Uses The Eizo ColorEdge CG19 Monitor? posted Sat May 7 2005 01:10:49 by Patroni
Let's Play Spot The Dot posted Tue Apr 26 2005 22:23:35 by DLKAPA
Let's Play- Ask The Experts! posted Fri Apr 15 2005 05:27:07 by SkyWestFan
New Game, Let's All Find The Motion Blur! posted Sat Jan 15 2005 20:33:05 by DLKAPA
Is The Devil In The Detail - Monitor Calibration posted Thu Jan 8 2009 03:43:16 by Garry
What Is The Best CRT Monitor To Use posted Mon Aug 11 2008 02:57:01 by JSearle