Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Centered Rejection?  
User currently offlineUA935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1751 times:

The following just got rejected centered:-

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r.../big/20080116_GBYGALHR01122007.jpg

It has the same amount of dead space below the engine and above the fuselage, how should we centre now accrding to the Anet enforcers?

Should the nose be centered vertically leaving a huge amount of dead space above the fuselage?

If so then things are on a downward spiral around here.


Live every second like you mean it
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKLM772ER From Germany, joined May 2006, 615 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1746 times:



Quoting UA935 (Thread starter):
It has the same amount of dead space below the engine and above the fuselage, how should we centre now accrding to the Anet enforcers?

I wouldn't make it according to any numbers or measurement...

The best way to center the plane in the frame is to simply have a look at it and make it look balanced! And than if you are not sure you can take some grids and center them both vertical and horizontal and have another look to judge better...
That is the way I do it and it works fine for me!

As for your picture, it is to high in frame...

TZ once had a good statement in a former thread:

Quoting TZ:
For the physicists out there, you're looking for the "centre of gravity" of the aircraft to be in the middle, unless the motivation of the shot dictates otherwise. I hope that makes sense?

hope this helps!

Cheers
Björn


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9628 posts, RR: 68
Reply 2, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1734 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

You also left out the soft and oversharp rejections.

Might be easier to get peoples opinions if they have all the facts.

My feeling is that if the quality was there it would not have seen a centering rejection.


User currently offlineUA935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1721 times:



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 2):
You also left out the soft and oversharp rejections.

Yeah that's a good one, soft and oversharp!

I posted for views on the centering issues not for anything else.

If I wanted opinion on if the image was oversharp or soft I would have requested that.

If you would like to explain how soft and oversharpened rejections go together go ahead but that was not the intention of my post.



Live every second like you mean it
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9628 posts, RR: 68
Reply 4, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1720 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER



Quoting UA935 (Reply 3):
If you would like to explain how soft and oversharpened rejections go together go ahead but that was not the intention of my post.

Out of focus image oversharpened to compensate.


User currently offlineUA935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1705 times:



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 4):

Out of focus image oversharpened to compensate.

Why not just use "Blurry" then which is for OOF?



Live every second like you mean it
User currently offline747438 From UK - England, joined Jan 2007, 838 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1691 times:

I'm no expert, but as soon as I opened the link, it seemed too high in the frame.

User currently offlineDM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1688 times:



Quoting 747438 (Reply 6):
I'm no expert, but as soon as I opened the link, it seemed too high in the frame.

I agree. I wouldn't try to center the image by the top of the nose and the bottom of the number 3 engine. Center it by the fuselage only. That way it wont look like its to high in the frame...

DM


User currently offlineJorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3149 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1645 times:

To add my center rejection here.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...0080117_OK-CGJ_735_OK_150407_3.jpg

How to crop better? On top or at the bottom?

georg


User currently offlineBoeingfreak From Germany, joined May 2005, 398 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1642 times:



Quoting Jorge1812 (Reply 8):
To add my center rejection here.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...0080117_OK-CGJ_735_OK_150407_3.jpg

How to crop better? On top or at the bottom?

Hi,
it's too high in the frame, I'd also darken it a bit, it looks very bright.

Cheers,
Florian  wave 


User currently offlineZakHH From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1635 times:



Quoting UA935 (Reply 3):
If you would like to explain how soft and oversharpened rejections go together go ahead

Why would they not go together?

Nobody says that your image is both soft and oversharpened as a whole. Some parts appear soft (they really do - especially the upper part of the fuselage), while other parts may seem oversharpened. I have to admit though that I do not see much oversharpening in your shot, but then again, I often fail to see oversharpened parts...

Anyway, I have this problem rather regularly when sharpening pictures - some parts already show jaggies, while others still appear soft.

As for the centering, I would agree that the first impression when looking at the picture is that it may be a tad too high in the frame.


User currently offlineJorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3149 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1620 times:



Quoting Boeingfreak (Reply 9):

Thanks.

georg


User currently offlineGhost77 From Mexico, joined Mar 2000, 5219 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (6 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1591 times:



Quoting UA935 (Thread starter):

Aircraft is a little high in frame, you missed more "sky on top".

Quoting UA935 (Reply 5):
Why not just use "Blurry" then which is for OOF?

When its OOF or under sharpen you can sharpen more and easily correct the picture issue, but a blurry shot, mostly, its a lost case scenario, as when picture was taken everything is-looks as "shaken" and no sharpening can save that.

Quoting Jorge1812 (Reply 8):

A little high in frame too, crop on the bottom, btw, a little 0.2/3 CW rotation would also help!

g77



Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Opinions On A Centered Rejection posted Mon Oct 1 2007 20:50:59 by Maiznblu_757
Motive, People, Centered Rejection? posted Fri Aug 11 2006 19:12:13 by Mario340
Centered Rejection. posted Tue Jun 20 2006 09:27:44 by Jid
Not Centered Rejection? posted Fri May 19 2006 03:05:25 by Airplanenut
Centered Rejection - Help Please posted Wed Mar 15 2006 09:12:43 by UA935
Question For The Rejection Reason Centered... posted Mon Jan 7 2008 14:45:44 by TweetDriver
Rejection For Bad Centered posted Thu Nov 1 2007 17:43:45 by A388
Centered And Soft Rejection posted Thu Aug 10 2006 22:41:30 by NicolasRubio
Rejection For Bad Centered, Need Help posted Tue Mar 7 2006 04:55:33 by A388
Help With Rejection (Centered), Please! posted Thu Dec 29 2005 08:29:02 by Frippe