Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 13 Posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2460 times:
I've really seen some weird things here but this one I can't understand.
I uploaded this picture recently, as it has a new job and thought it may be interesting for the site:
You can find other pics from its former country and job here as it saves me listing them all here :
Now my shot was rejected, as the screener said: "Info = airline should be "Helilink / Westpac Trust". Please use Auto-Complete on upload page to fill in info."
This info is now incorrect, as Westpac used to sponsor the aircraft when it was doing search and rescue in its previous country. It is now operated on behalf of the Aus Government. Westpac now has nothing to do with this chopper. What is not to understand?
I work in conjunction with these people The helicopter crew and our crew do the same job and I know that Westpac have nothing to do with our job, so why should it be included in the details? Details change on aircraft that are previously uploaded.
It's in the same situation as this aircraft. It used to be sponsored for SAR and now its not doing that role:
Paulinbna From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 1114 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2394 times:
Quoting Eadster (Thread starter): Now my shot was rejected, as the screener said: "Info = airline should be "Helilink / Westpac Trust". Please use Auto-Complete on upload page to fill in info."
I have gotten a few rejections because the auto fill filled in the wrong stuff. Did you select I would like to add my own info the add to the upload page. Just trying to figure why the screener told you to use the auto fill box when on the side of the helo it says customs.
Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
Psych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3069 posts, RR: 57
Reply 10, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2321 times:
Given the technical problems with the site over recent times, I am sure there will be many who could quite believe you did add a comment in your appeal but it somehow disappeared in transit to the Head Screeners.
I wonder whether it might be beneficial to add another sentence to the new upload page in the bullet point about the 'Auto Complete function' in the 'How to improve the chances of success' section, words to the effect that:
'....it still remains your responsibility to check the accuracy of the resulting information. If you notice that the information generated is now incorrect, please add a note to the the screeners about this when you upload your image.'
That way screeners will have their attention drawn to the potential conflict between the Auto Complete-generated information and what the uploader is submitting, and they can then do their own further checks as they see fit. Also, A.net is further clarifying for its uploaders their responsibilities.
Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 13
Reply 15, posted (7 years 4 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2182 times:
Quoting Cpd (Reply 14): By the way, I don't want to seem disrespectful - just want to be clear on that. Sorry if it did seem so.
Why would you think that?? My reply was probably a bit off. To be honest I was more worried about the info rather than the other minor details. Sorry if it seemed that I didn't appreciate the help as I did.
The shot has been re-uploaded with some changes made to both info and the shot itself. We'll see if my explanation of the info change will go through this time.