Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejection Clarification  
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1673 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I got a rejection on this photo:

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 683 File size: 502kb


Blurry and Double. The double really baffles me. I appealed and got re-rejected for Blurry and Double.

I can accept the Blurry rejection. I'm not the best at panning shots. The database has a whole 47 DHL DC-9. 95% of those are either landing, taxiing, or stationary.

Can some one explain the Double? I have 1 shot in the database of N966AX. It is a side on sunny shot as it taxied by. In fact here it is:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Erick Lopez



The shots were taken on different days. One shot is a taxi to the south and the rejected "Double" is a take off to the north.

DHL sends a DC-9 to BFI almost everyday. Does this mean I can no longer upload side on shots of this airplane?

-Erick

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2725 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1634 times:

That makes no sense to me, the blurry is understandable, but Double? I guess I need to read the upload guidelines again, as it says a Double is a shot taken in a similar sequence on the same day with the same motiv (taxi, land, takeoff, etc.). And both shots are from different dates, diferent shooting sequences, and on different motives.

Very strange, maybe a screener can elaborate.
-Matt



No info
User currently offlineUnattendedBag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2310 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (6 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1634 times:



Quoting 777MechSys (Thread starter):
The double really baffles me.

yeah, I agree. I can't understand why double was given as a rejection reason. Same plane, but different days and different stages of operation. I can understand someone trying to get 3 or 4 of the same aircraft accepted with the same conditions, but 2?



Slower traffic, keep right
User currently offlineAcontador From Chile, joined Jul 2005, 1417 posts, RR: 31
Reply 3, posted (6 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1588 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Erick,

Unfortunately, I think the problem is that you indicated for the date on both only same month/year (no specific day). You probably have your reasons for doing so, which is OK, but as screeners we have to consider the possibility that the pictures were taken on the same day (unless of course it is very evident from the pictures that they were taken on different days, like one sunny and one overcast). To my eye they both look like they could have been taken on same day, and in absence of any other information (which I think you didn't provide, either in the remark or the comment fields), and considering they both show the aircraft from a very similar angle, they qualify as a double.
Please put yourself in our shoes: How can we know they weren't taken on the same day?
As long as you have to upload without exact date, you'll probably face the same problem in case you're uploading pictures of same aircraft/airport/side. In any case, I suggest next time this happens you put a comment to screeners in this respect.

Hope this clarifies your doubts.



Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (6 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1578 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Andres,

Thank you for your reply. I agree with you about why I initially received the double rejection. In fact the original rejection does not bother me. I put myself in the screeners shoes all the time.

What stirs me up is the fact that the appeal was also given a double rejection. I fully explained that the shots where on different days. I even gave a full explanation to such, not just a "trust me". When the appeal received the double rejection I felt one of two things. First, it makes me feel the appeal was not given a fair chance and just rubber stamped. I'm not saying this is what happened. You have to put yourself in my shoes and see how that looks after I provided a full explanation. Second, it makes me feel like I am being called a liar. Like i'm trying to pull a fast one on the screeners.


-Erick


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Motive Rejection..clarification Please? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 14:40:46 by BrianW999
Clarification On Rejection posted Sun Nov 27 2005 01:51:47 by Lanpie
Clarification On What A Rejection Message Means posted Mon Jan 14 2002 22:31:05 by Mark2102
Soft Rejection posted Sun Jan 27 2008 06:12:43 by Carlos
Contrast, Color. Dark Rejection. Opinion Please. posted Sat Jan 26 2008 11:25:20 by Bustin
Level Rejection posted Wed Jan 23 2008 13:41:54 by Borut
Help With A Blurry Rejection Please posted Mon Jan 21 2008 20:33:40 by LOCsta
Should I Appeal This Level Rejection? posted Sat Jan 19 2008 09:57:10 by Deaphen
Screeners - Creative But Maybe Centre Rejection? posted Fri Jan 18 2008 02:37:17 by JakTrax
Having Issues With Info Rejection posted Thu Jan 17 2008 15:49:40 by Sovietjet