Screener Error? — Aviation Photography Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Screener Error?

Nighty142 From Sweden, joined Aug 2005, 6 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1554 times:

http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1323098L

Just take a look at the tail, isn't it obvious the reflections on the tail? Still in wonder how it could get accepted...

9 replies: All unread, jump to last

Flynavy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1548 times:

Perhaps a better was to go about this would be to email the screeners directly (screeners@airliners.net) with your concerns?

UnattendedBag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2240 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1542 times:

looks like the two people in the reflection are running from the dragon on the tail.
rotfl

Slower traffic, keep right

Codeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1485 times:

The reflections are there. Looks like it was shot through windows.

KS/codeshare

How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?

TweetDriver From Germany, joined Dec 2005, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 1446 times:

Funny though that this then is not exeptable due to the reflection...and this aircraft is not even in the database....

MyAviation.net photo:

Photo © Henk Schmidt-Bergemann

Regards, Henk

Jorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3141 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 1428 times:

For sure taken thru a window reflecting the terminal on the "tail". Should've been rejected but for such things better

Quoting Flynavy (Reply 1):
Perhaps a better was to go about this would be to email the screeners directly (screeners@airliners.net) with your concerns?

georg

NIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1343 times:

Quoting Flynavy (Reply 1):
Perhaps a better was to go about this would be to email the screeners directly (screeners@airliners.net) with your concerns?

Yes but then that defeats the purpose of trolling the DB looking for an excuse to post these threads in the first place. crazy

Jamesbaldwyn From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1278 times:

Ay Up - " There is no photo in our database with that ID number. Back. "

Silver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4538 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1267 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting TweetDriver (Reply 4):
Funny though that this then is not exeptable due to the reflection...and this aircraft is not even in the database....

I feel for ya man... Not long after we had that discussion about your photo here in the forum, another air-to-air shot made the front page that had an obvious reflection.

ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.

TweetDriver From Germany, joined Dec 2005, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1264 times:

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 8):
I feel for ya man... Not long after we had that discussion about your photo here in the forum, another air-to-air shot made the front page that had an obvious reflection.

And I cannot rework it anymore since the RAW with about 10.000 others got killed yesterday with a harddrive problem.

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: