Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Better Buy D300 Or 40D  
User currently offline20329 From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 2 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2561 times:

I'm looking at a new camra nikon D300 or the canon 40D by the way my old camra is a nikon 35mm eny help is welcone.

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1294 posts, RR: 17
Reply 1, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2557 times:

Even though I am a Canon shooter and have a fantastic 40D, reviews are saying the D300 is a better body (better AF, better ISO, resolution) . I feel that Canon has a better lens selection however, which is why I stick with Canon. You will have to invest in decent lenses to get the most out of a good camera body. Good luck with your choice, you can't go wrong with either.
-Matt



Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineCalgaryBill From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2555 times:

I bought the D3 and D300 last fall. All I can say is that the D300 is darn near the same camera - same autofocus module, same image processor, upgraded (from the D200) to a CMOS sensor. All you lose is the battery power and frame rate of the D3, but you can achieve both of those by adding the battery grip. Of course you don't get a full frame sensor like the D3, but that might not be a bad thing in aviation photography.

One thing I love about it is the autofocus - it is fast. Best I can tell, it is as fast as the D3 and tracks really well (can't wait to test that theory at an airshow). You can't go wrong with a D300, but Matt said it best:

Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 1):
Good luck with your choice, you can't go wrong with either.

If you already have decent Nikon lenses you might as well just stick with Nikon.

B


User currently offlinePowercube From Australia, joined Jul 2007, 265 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2551 times:



Quoting CalgaryBill (Reply 2):
One thing I love about it is the autofocus - it is fast. Best I can tell, it is as fast as the D3 and tracks really well (can't wait to test that theory at an airshow). You can't go wrong with a D300, but Matt said it best:

The D300 is bar none the best camera I have ever owned. The one thing that I dislike about it, and this is very, very, small thing: that is, the .nef files are not compatible with CS2, so I have to process them using Nikon's rather shabby Capture NX software, then export them as a .tiff. If you use CS3, you probably wont have this problem.


User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2531 times:



Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 1):
reviews are saying the D300 is a better body (better AF, better ISO, resolution) . I feel that Canon has a better lens selection however

I have to agree with this statement. From what I've heard Nikon have pulled a trump card from up their sleeve with the D300. Although the 40D is supposedly Canon's equivalent offering I believe the D300 is probably closer to the 5D quality-wise. As for lenses, I too reckon Canon have the edge there - just remember, the quality of the glass is perhaps more important than the body.

Either way, you have a tough decision there, but one which will work out great whichever way you go!

Karl


User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 65
Reply 5, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2531 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I'd go for the system your buddies are using. That way you can swap lenses, change batteries when it dies etc etc

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineGuamVICE From Guam, joined Jun 2005, 151 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2493 times:



Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 5):
I'd go for the system your buddies are using

that's always a good idea, especially if you're just starting out.



The two most engaging powers of a photographer are to make new things familiar and to make familiar things new. ~Thacker
User currently offlinePhilhyde From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 678 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2467 times:

Have you got any Nikon lenses that you plan to keep/use? If so, then Nikon obviously has an edge. Otherwise, give Canon a fair shake. The Nikon guys that I know have historically complained about Nikkor glass being overly expensive and hard to find (out of stock). Sigma lenses are also a good consideration (for either brand).


HoustonSpotters Admin - Canon junkie - Aviation Nut
User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2453 times:

The D300 will work with older lens so that's a plus for you. Changing to a new brand/system will could be costly (unlikely for CalgaryBill Big grin , eh? ).

KS/codeshare



How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2428 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 5):
I'd go for the system your buddies are using. That way you can swap lenses

Hell yeah! I "borrow" Royal's lenses all the time.


User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 21
Reply 10, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2407 times:



Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 5):
I'd go for the system your buddies are using

Odd that I haven't heard this advice before, as it's the best I've heard! Big grin

So, let me end this reply with a  checkmark 


User currently offlineCpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 38
Reply 11, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2406 times:



Quoting Philhyde (Reply 7):
Have you got any Nikon lenses that you plan to keep/use? If so, then Nikon obviously has an edge. Otherwise, give Canon a fair shake. The Nikon guys that I know have historically complained about Nikkor glass being overly expensive and hard to find (out of stock). Sigma lenses are also a good consideration (for either brand).

I'll agree with that. Nikkor lenses (the good ones) are very expensive. It's the reason I haven't purchased a VR lens. The price is too steep.


User currently offline20329 From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2376 times:

thanks for the posts!

User currently offlineCalgaryBill From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2372 times:



Quoting Powercube (Reply 3):
The one thing that I dislike about it, and this is very, very, small thing: that is, the .nef files are not compatible with CS2, so I have to process them using Nikon's rather shabby Capture NX software, then export them as a .tiff.

Or you can download Adobe's DNG converter for free. It can convert batches of D300 (and D3) NEF's to DNG, which you can open in CS2, and they retain the quality of your original RAW files.

The newest version of Lightroom can also open the new NEF files and it's a fantastic app for processing large batches of images.

Quoting Powercube (Reply 3):
If you use CS3, you probably wont have this problem.

Correct. As long as you update ACR to 4.3 (I think is the version) it will open both D3 and D300 NEF's.

Quoting Codeshare (Reply 8):
Changing to a new brand/system will could be costly (unlikely for CalgaryBill Big grin , eh? ).

Hey, it's just as expensive for me! As my grandpa loves to say, I have "more money than brains, and not much money."  Wow!

B


User currently offlinePowercube From Australia, joined Jul 2007, 265 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2366 times:



Quoting CalgaryBill (Reply 13):
Or you can download Adobe's DNG converter for free. It can convert batches of D300 (and D3) NEF's to DNG, which you can open in CS2, and they retain the quality of your original RAW files.

Thank you, you have saved my day- and were I in YYC I would offer you cookies! I had heard of a download, but I thought it was a myth!


User currently offlineOssenbergJoh From Germany, joined Apr 2005, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2332 times:

I have upgraded from a 300D to a 40D last September (which was quite a big step...). I can´t tell you much about the D300 so I just give you my view/ opinion about the 40D.

I like the personal presets pretty much as it allows for some nice and usable settings. You can switch between these setting quite fast I´d say.
The bigger display is also a win if you wanna make a first judgement on your picture. The sharpness is still not the best though...
Also, the self- cleaning sensor is a feature I like as sensor cleaning can be very annoying sometimes.
A disadvantage is the higher noise level when compared to Nikon camreas. But thats old news.

All in all the 40D has some nice feautures and the overall impression is great.

Concerning the lenses... already been said I guess. In the end it´s a question of personal preference and a question of faith for some guys. Just have a look at the features and technical data of each camera and choose what fits you best.

Johannes

[Edited 2008-02-23 06:18:53]

User currently offlineCalgarybill From Canada, joined May 2006, 686 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2322 times:



Quoting Powercube (Reply 14):
Thank you, you have saved my day- and were I in YYC I would offer you cookies! I had heard of a download, but I thought it was a myth!

Hey, if they have chocolate in them I'm in! Let me know next time you're in Calgary and we can get out shooting...

Here's the DNG converter link:
http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/

B


User currently offlineDvincent From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1742 posts, RR: 11
Reply 17, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2318 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The D300 is an excellent camera. It's not really in the same class as the 40D, it outstrips it in every way. You would expect it to since it costs about $800 more! When you think about it, it's really a replacement for the venerable D2X, in that its feature set is similar to that old beast, but with some cost cutting, like a separate vertical grip. I have not heard a single bad word about the D300 and if I shot Nikon, it would be my tool of choice.


From the Mind of Minolta
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Which Is Better? Olympus C-750 Or Fuji S5000 posted Sun Dec 28 2003 23:03:52 by RyanAMS
Canon 20D/30D/40D Which One Should I Buy? posted Sat Jan 12 2008 02:42:19 by Whisperjet
Anyone Using 40D + 24-105L? Or Similar Lens? posted Mon Dec 10 2007 14:19:35 by EDDL
Canon EOS 40D Or Rebel XTi posted Tue Aug 28 2007 03:37:55 by CaptainJon
Which To Buy? Sony Alph Or Nikon D70S posted Tue Apr 3 2007 23:55:20 by An225
Good Enough? (or Better Delete It...?) posted Tue Nov 14 2006 19:16:49 by JetCrazy
Looking To Buy An Epson Or Canon Printer. Help!? posted Mon Sep 26 2005 01:37:18 by Tappan
Which Glass Is Better? Canon L Or D.O.? posted Mon Sep 12 2005 01:49:41 by AndrewUber
Canon 300D...or What's Better For The Price? posted Tue Dec 28 2004 11:38:25 by Andz
Worth The Buy Or Wait? posted Thu Nov 18 2004 11:11:34 by Draigonair